Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital, Universitas Indonesia, 6th Salemba Raya, DKI Jakarta, 10430, Indonesia.
Department of Urology, Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital, Universitas Indonesia, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia.
BMC Anesthesiol. 2019 Dec 5;19(1):221. doi: 10.1186/s12871-019-0891-7.
Epidural analgesia as the effective pain management for abdominal surgery has side effects such as paresthesia, hypotension, hematomas, and impaired motoric of lower limbs. The quadratus lumborum block (QLB) has potential as an abdominal truncal block, however, its analgesic efficacy has never been compared to epidural analgesia on laparoscopic nephrectomy. This prospective randomized controlled study compared the effectiveness of QLB with the epidural analgesia technique in relieving postoperative pain following transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy.
Sixty-two patients underwent laparoscopic donor nephrectomy and were randomized to receive QLB (n = 31) or continuous epidural (n = 31). The QLB group received bilateral QLB using 0.25% bupivacaine and the epidural group received 6 ml/h of 0.25% bupivacaine for intraoperative analgesia. As postoperative analgesia, the QLB group received repeated bilateral QLB with the same dose and the epidural group received 6 ml/h of 0.125% bupivacaine for 24 h after surgery completion. The primary outcome was the 24-h cumulative morphine requirement after surgery. The secondary outcome was the postoperative pain scores. Sensory block coverage, hemodynamic changes, Bromage score, postoperative nausea-vomiting (PONV), paresthesia, and duration of urinary catheter usage were recorded and analyzed.
The 24-h cumulative morphine requirement and pain scores after surgery were comparable between the QLB and epidural groups. The coverage of QLB was extended from T9 to L2 and the continuous epidural block was extended from T8 to L3 dermatomes. The mean arterial pressure (MAP) measured at 24 h after surgery was lower in the epidural group (p = 0.001). Bromage score, incidence of PONV, and paresthesia were not significantly different between the two groups. Duration of urinary catheter usage was shorter (p < 0.001) in the QLB group.
The repeated QLB had a similar 24-h cumulative morphine requirement, comparable postoperative pain scores and sensory blockade, higher postoperative MAP, a similar degree of motoric block, no difference in the incidence of PONV and paresthesia, and shorter urinary catheter usage, compared to the continuous epidural analgesia following transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy.
ClinicalTrial.gov NCT03520205 retrospectively registered on May 9th 2018.
硬膜外镇痛作为腹部手术有效的疼痛管理方法,存在感觉异常、低血压、血肿和下肢运动障碍等副作用。竖脊肌平面阻滞(QLB)作为一种腹部躯干阻滞方法具有一定的潜力,然而,其在腹腔镜肾切除术后的镇痛效果尚未与硬膜外镇痛进行比较。本前瞻性随机对照研究比较了 QLB 与硬膜外镇痛技术在经腹腔腹腔镜肾切除术后缓解术后疼痛的效果。
62 例接受腹腔镜供肾切除术的患者被随机分为 QLB 组(n=31)或连续硬膜外组(n=31)。QLB 组接受双侧 QLB,使用 0.25%布比卡因,硬膜外组接受术中 6ml/h 0.25%布比卡因。作为术后镇痛,QLB 组在术后 24 小时内接受重复双侧 QLB,剂量相同,硬膜外组在术后完成后接受 6ml/h 0.125%布比卡因 24 小时。主要结局是术后 24 小时累积吗啡需求。次要结局是术后疼痛评分。记录并分析感觉阻滞覆盖范围、血流动力学变化、Bromage 评分、术后恶心呕吐(PONV)、感觉异常和导尿管使用时间。
QLB 组和硬膜外组术后 24 小时累积吗啡需求和疼痛评分无差异。QLB 的覆盖范围从 T9 扩展到 L2,连续硬膜外阻滞从 T8 扩展到 L3 皮节。术后 24 小时测量的平均动脉压(MAP)在硬膜外组较低(p=0.001)。Bromage 评分、PONV 发生率和感觉异常在两组间无显著差异。导尿管使用时间较短(p<0.001)在 QLB 组。
与经腹腔腹腔镜肾切除术后连续硬膜外镇痛相比,重复 QLB 具有相似的 24 小时累积吗啡需求、相似的术后疼痛评分和感觉阻滞程度、较高的术后 MAP、相似程度的运动阻滞、PONV 和感觉异常发生率无差异,以及较短的导尿管使用时间。
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03520205 于 2018 年 5 月 9 日进行了回顾性注册。