Suppr超能文献

一项关于腹腔镜肾切除术后重复腰方肌阻滞与连续硬膜外镇痛的镇痛效果的随机对照试验。

A randomized controlled trial on analgesic effect of repeated Quadratus Lumborum block versus continuous epidural analgesia following laparoscopic nephrectomy.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital, Universitas Indonesia, 6th Salemba Raya, DKI Jakarta, 10430, Indonesia.

Department of Urology, Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital, Universitas Indonesia, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia.

出版信息

BMC Anesthesiol. 2019 Dec 5;19(1):221. doi: 10.1186/s12871-019-0891-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Epidural analgesia as the effective pain management for abdominal surgery has side effects such as paresthesia, hypotension, hematomas, and impaired motoric of lower limbs. The quadratus lumborum block (QLB) has potential as an abdominal truncal block, however, its analgesic efficacy has never been compared to epidural analgesia on laparoscopic nephrectomy. This prospective randomized controlled study compared the effectiveness of QLB with the epidural analgesia technique in relieving postoperative pain following transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy.

METHODS

Sixty-two patients underwent laparoscopic donor nephrectomy and were randomized to receive QLB (n = 31) or continuous epidural (n = 31). The QLB group received bilateral QLB using 0.25% bupivacaine and the epidural group received 6 ml/h of 0.25% bupivacaine for intraoperative analgesia. As postoperative analgesia, the QLB group received repeated bilateral QLB with the same dose and the epidural group received 6 ml/h of 0.125% bupivacaine for 24 h after surgery completion. The primary outcome was the 24-h cumulative morphine requirement after surgery. The secondary outcome was the postoperative pain scores. Sensory block coverage, hemodynamic changes, Bromage score, postoperative nausea-vomiting (PONV), paresthesia, and duration of urinary catheter usage were recorded and analyzed.

RESULT

The 24-h cumulative morphine requirement and pain scores after surgery were comparable between the QLB and epidural groups. The coverage of QLB was extended from T9 to L2 and the continuous epidural block was extended from T8 to L3 dermatomes. The mean arterial pressure (MAP) measured at 24 h after surgery was lower in the epidural group (p = 0.001). Bromage score, incidence of PONV, and paresthesia were not significantly different between the two groups. Duration of urinary catheter usage was shorter (p < 0.001) in the QLB group.

CONCLUSION

The repeated QLB had a similar 24-h cumulative morphine requirement, comparable postoperative pain scores and sensory blockade, higher postoperative MAP, a similar degree of motoric block, no difference in the incidence of PONV and paresthesia, and shorter urinary catheter usage, compared to the continuous epidural analgesia following transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrial.gov NCT03520205 retrospectively registered on May 9th 2018.

摘要

背景

硬膜外镇痛作为腹部手术有效的疼痛管理方法,存在感觉异常、低血压、血肿和下肢运动障碍等副作用。竖脊肌平面阻滞(QLB)作为一种腹部躯干阻滞方法具有一定的潜力,然而,其在腹腔镜肾切除术后的镇痛效果尚未与硬膜外镇痛进行比较。本前瞻性随机对照研究比较了 QLB 与硬膜外镇痛技术在经腹腔腹腔镜肾切除术后缓解术后疼痛的效果。

方法

62 例接受腹腔镜供肾切除术的患者被随机分为 QLB 组(n=31)或连续硬膜外组(n=31)。QLB 组接受双侧 QLB,使用 0.25%布比卡因,硬膜外组接受术中 6ml/h 0.25%布比卡因。作为术后镇痛,QLB 组在术后 24 小时内接受重复双侧 QLB,剂量相同,硬膜外组在术后完成后接受 6ml/h 0.125%布比卡因 24 小时。主要结局是术后 24 小时累积吗啡需求。次要结局是术后疼痛评分。记录并分析感觉阻滞覆盖范围、血流动力学变化、Bromage 评分、术后恶心呕吐(PONV)、感觉异常和导尿管使用时间。

结果

QLB 组和硬膜外组术后 24 小时累积吗啡需求和疼痛评分无差异。QLB 的覆盖范围从 T9 扩展到 L2,连续硬膜外阻滞从 T8 扩展到 L3 皮节。术后 24 小时测量的平均动脉压(MAP)在硬膜外组较低(p=0.001)。Bromage 评分、PONV 发生率和感觉异常在两组间无显著差异。导尿管使用时间较短(p<0.001)在 QLB 组。

结论

与经腹腔腹腔镜肾切除术后连续硬膜外镇痛相比,重复 QLB 具有相似的 24 小时累积吗啡需求、相似的术后疼痛评分和感觉阻滞程度、较高的术后 MAP、相似程度的运动阻滞、PONV 和感觉异常发生率无差异,以及较短的导尿管使用时间。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03520205 于 2018 年 5 月 9 日进行了回顾性注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c491/6894195/3bb81bb6a483/12871_2019_891_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验