Vilvanathan Santhosh, Saravanababu M S, Sreedhar Rupa, Gadhinglajkar Shinivas Vitthal, Dash Prasanta Kumar, Sukesan Subin
Department of Anaesthesiology, Division of Cardiothroracic and Vascular Anaesthesiology, Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India.
Anesth Essays Res. 2020 Apr-Jun;14(2):300-304. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_32_20. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
To assess the quality and effectiveness of postoperative pain relief after fast-tracking tracheal extubation in cardiac surgery intensive care unit, effected by a single-shot modified parasternal intercostal nerve block compared with routine in-hospital analgesic protocol, when administered before sternotomy.
A prospective, randomized, double-blinded interventional study.
Single-center tertiary teaching hospital.
Ninety adult patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass.
Patients were randomized into two groups. Patients in the parasternal intercostal block group (PIB) ( = 45) received ultrasound-guided modified parasternal intercostal nerve block with 0.5% levobupivacaine after anesthesia induction at 2-6 intercostal space along postinduction using standardized anesthesia drugs with routine postoperative hospital analgesic protocol with intravenous morphine. Patients in the group following routine hospital analgesia protocol (HAP) ( = 45) served as controls, with standardized anesthesia drugs and routine hospital postoperative analgesic protocol with intravenous morphine. The primary study outcome aimed to evaluate pain at rest and when doing deep breathing exercises with spirometry, coughing expectorations using a 11-point numerical rating scale.
The postoperative pain score at rest and during breathing exercises was compared between the two groups at different time durations (15 min after extubation and every 4 hourly for 24 h). Patients in the PIB group had significantly lower pain scores and better quality of analgesia during the entire study period at rest and during breathing exercise ( < 0.0001). Furthermore, the side effect profile and need of rescue analgesics were better in the PIB group than the HAP group at different time intervals.
PIB is safe for presternotomy administration and provided significant quality of pain relief postoperatively, as seen after tracheal extubation for a period of 24 h, on rest as well as with deep breathing, coughing, and chest physiotherapy exercises when compared to intravenous morphine alone after sternotomy. This study further emphasizes the role of preemptive analgesia in mitigating postoperative sternotomy pain and it's role as a plausible safe analgesic adjunct facilitating fast tracking with sternotomies on systemic heparinization.
评估在心脏外科重症监护病房,与常规院内镇痛方案相比,在胸骨切开术前进行单次改良胸骨旁肋间神经阻滞对快速气管拔管后术后疼痛缓解的质量和效果。
一项前瞻性、随机、双盲干预性研究。
单中心三级教学医院。
90例接受择期体外循环冠状动脉搭桥手术的成年患者。
将患者随机分为两组。胸骨旁肋间阻滞组(PIB组)(n = 45)在麻醉诱导后,于第2 - 6肋间间隙使用0.5%左旋布比卡因进行超声引导下改良胸骨旁肋间神经阻滞,使用标准化麻醉药物,并采用常规术后院内镇痛方案,静脉注射吗啡。常规院内镇痛方案组(HAP组)(n = 45)作为对照组,使用标准化麻醉药物和常规术后院内镇痛方案,静脉注射吗啡。主要研究结局旨在使用11分数字评分量表评估静息时以及进行肺活量测定深呼吸练习、咳嗽咳痰时的疼痛程度。
在不同时间段(拔管后15分钟以及之后24小时每4小时一次)比较两组静息时和呼吸练习时的术后疼痛评分。PIB组患者在整个研究期间静息时和呼吸练习时的疼痛评分显著更低,镇痛质量更好(P < 0.0001)。此外,在不同时间间隔,PIB组的副作用情况和急救镇痛药需求均优于HAP组。
胸骨切开术前给予PIB是安全的,与胸骨切开术后单纯静脉注射吗啡相比,气管拔管后24小时内,无论是静息时还是进行深呼吸、咳嗽及胸部物理治疗练习时,PIB均能显著提高术后疼痛缓解质量。本研究进一步强调了超前镇痛在减轻胸骨切开术后疼痛中的作用,以及它作为一种合理的安全镇痛辅助手段在全身肝素化下促进胸骨切开术快速康复中的作用。