Garg Jony, Kathuria Suneet, Gautam Parshotam Lal, Luthra Neeru, Gupta Shikha
Department of Anaesthesia, Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, India.
Department of Anaesthesia, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.
Anesth Essays Res. 2020 Apr-Jun;14(2):321-325. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_56_20. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
Femoral nerve block (FNB) and intra-articular analgesia (IAA) are used for postoperative analgesia after total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
We aimed to determine the better technique among the two, with regard to duration and quality of postoperative analgesia along with 24-h rescue analgesic consumption. The functional recovery in the early postoperative period was also assessed.
This was a prospective double-blind study comprising 40 American Society of Anesthesiologists I-III patients undergoing elective TKA who were randomly assigned to two groups ( = 20).
In Group A, 20 mL ropivacaine 0.5%, containing dexmedetomidine (1 μg.kg ), was given by FNB, and in Group B, intra-articular administration of the same drug was done. Analgesic effect was evaluated by measuring the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and duration of analgesia. Quadriceps muscle strength was noted.
Observation data obtained were reported as mean value and analyzed using Student's -test or Wilcoxon/Mann-Whitney rank test.
The mean VAS on passive movement at the 2, 6, and 16 h postoperatively was 1.75 ± 0.44, 2.90 ± 0.72, and 2.75 ± 0.44 in Group A as compared to 2.25 ± 0.72, 4.30 ± 2.05, and 2.20 ± 0.77 in Group B ( = 0.026, 0.043, and 0.014, respectively). In Group A, the first request for analgesic (rescue analgesic) was at 637 ± 119 min and the total consumption of tramadol was 50.00 mg. In Group B, the first request for analgesic was at 404.44 ± 136 min, with a total dose of 63.89 mg. The Pvalue for the time of rescue analgesic was <0.001, while for total drug consumption, it was 0.018.
We concluded that the duration and quality of analgesia (VAS) were significantly superior and rescue analgesic requirement less in patients who received FNB as compared to IAA.
股神经阻滞(FNB)和关节内镇痛(IAA)用于全膝关节置换术(TKA)后的术后镇痛。
我们旨在确定这两种技术中哪一种在术后镇痛的持续时间和质量以及24小时补救性镇痛药物消耗方面更优。同时还评估了术后早期的功能恢复情况。
这是一项前瞻性双盲研究,纳入了40例美国麻醉医师协会I - III级择期行TKA的患者,随机分为两组(每组 = 20例)。
A组通过股神经阻滞给予20 mL含右美托咪定(1 μg/kg)的0.5%罗哌卡因,B组进行相同药物的关节内给药。通过测量视觉模拟评分(VAS)和镇痛持续时间评估镇痛效果。记录股四头肌力量。
获得的观察数据以平均值报告,并使用学生t检验或Wilcoxon/Mann - Whitney秩和检验进行分析。
术后2小时、6小时和16小时被动活动时的平均VAS,A组分别为1.75±0.44、2.90±0.72和2.75±0.44,B组分别为2.25±0.72、4.30±2.05和2.20±0.77(P值分别为0.026、0.043和0.014)。A组首次要求镇痛(补救性镇痛)的时间为637±119分钟,曲马多总消耗量为50.00 mg。B组首次要求镇痛的时间为404.44±136分钟,总剂量为63.89 mg。补救性镇痛时间的P值<0.001,而药物总消耗量的P值为0.018。
我们得出结论,与关节内镇痛相比,接受股神经阻滞的患者镇痛持续时间和质量(VAS)明显更优,补救性镇痛需求更少。