Kuchálik Ján, Magnuson Anders, Lundin Anders, Gupta Anil
Departments of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Scand J Pain. 2017 Jul;16:223-230. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2017.05.002. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
Several methods for pain management following total hip arthroplasty (THA) have been described but the best postoperative pain management technique remains uncertain. We compared surgeon applied local infiltration analgesia (LIA) with anaesthesiologist performed femoral nerve block (FNB) using ultrasound. The primary aim was to assess pain intensity 24h after THA.
In this randomized, double-blind study, 56 patients (ASA I-III) undergoing THA consented to participate. In Group FNB, patients received an ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block using 30ml of ropivacaine 7.5mg/ml (225mg) while Group LIA received a similar volume of saline. Spinal anaesthesia was then performed and bupivacaine heavy, 3-3.5ml injected depending on patient characteristics. During surgery, patients in Group LIA received a mixture of 300mg (150ml) ropivacaine, ketorolac 30mg (1ml) and adrenaline 0.5mg (0.5ml) (total volume 151.5ml) peri-articularly and subcutaneously while Group FNB received 151.5ml of saline peri-articularly in a systematic way by the surgeon. A multi-hole catheter was placed with the tip placed intra-articularly at the end of surgery in both groups. After 23h, the LIA mixture consisting of 20ml ropivacaine (7.5mg/ml), ketorolac 30mg (1ml), adrenaline 0.1mg (1ml) (total volume 22ml) was injected in Group LIA and the same volume of saline in Group FNB. Postoperative pain, analgesic consumption (postoperative and post-discharge), side effects, home discharge, quality of life and hip function were recorded, the latter up to 6 months after surgery.
Postoperative pain intensity was significantly lower in Group LIA compared to Group FNB during mobilization at 24h (primary endpoint), mean difference 1.8 NRS units (95% CI 0.7-2.9) (P=0.006), at rest after 4h (P=0.029) and on standing after 24 (P=0.0003) and 48h (P=0.043). Rescue morphine consumption was also significantly lower in Group LIA during 0-24, mean difference 13.5mg (95% CI, 6.1-20.9) (P=0.002) postoperatively. Motor block was greater at 6h (P=0.029) postoperatively in Group FNB. Two patients (one in each group) had persistent post-surgical pain (NRS>3) at 3 months (3.6%) but none at 6 month. No other differences were found between the groups.
Local infiltration analgesia significantly reduces pain intensity on standing and mobilization, and rescue analgesic consumption compared to femoral nerve block without causing significant side effects. The superior analgesia in the LIA group may result from the secondary injection at 23h postoperatively and needs to be further evaluated in future studies. No differences were found in home discharge, quality of life and hip dysfunction between the groups.
Local infiltration analgesia is the preferred method for postoperative pain management following THA compared to single-shot femoral nerve block.
全髋关节置换术(THA)后疼痛管理有多种方法,但最佳的术后疼痛管理技术仍不明确。我们比较了外科医生实施的局部浸润镇痛(LIA)与麻醉医生使用超声进行的股神经阻滞(FNB)。主要目的是评估THA术后24小时的疼痛强度。
在这项随机、双盲研究中,56例接受THA的患者(ASA I-III级)同意参与。FNB组患者接受超声引导下的股神经阻滞,使用30ml浓度为7.5mg/ml的罗哌卡因(225mg),而LIA组接受相同体积的生理盐水。然后实施脊髓麻醉,根据患者特征注射3-3.5ml重比重布比卡因。手术期间,LIA组患者在关节周围和皮下接受300mg(150ml)罗哌卡因、30mg(1ml)酮咯酸和0.5mg(0.5ml)肾上腺素的混合液(总体积151.5ml),而FNB组由外科医生以系统方式在关节周围注射151.5ml生理盐水。两组在手术结束时均放置一根多孔导管,导管尖端置于关节腔内。23小时后,LIA组注射由20ml罗哌卡因(7.5mg/ml)、30mg(1ml)酮咯酸、0.1mg(1ml)肾上腺素组成的LIA混合液(总体积22ml),FNB组注射相同体积的生理盐水。记录术后疼痛、镇痛药物消耗(术后及出院后)、副作用、出院情况、生活质量和髋关节功能,后者记录至术后6个月。
在24小时活动时(主要终点),LIA组术后疼痛强度显著低于FNB组,平均差值为1.8个数字评定量表(NRS)单位(95%CI 0.7-2.9)(P=0.006),4小时静息时(P=0.029)以及24小时(P=0.0003)和48小时(P=0.043)站立时也是如此。术后0-24小时内,LIA组的急救吗啡消耗量也显著低于FNB组,平均差值为13.5mg(95%CI,6.1-20.9)(P=0.002)。FNB组术后6小时运动阻滞更明显(P=0.029)。两名患者(每组各一名)在3个月时出现持续性术后疼痛(NRS>3)(3.6%),但6个月时均无。两组之间未发现其他差异。
与股神经阻滞相比,局部浸润镇痛显著降低站立和活动时的疼痛强度以及急救镇痛药物消耗量,且未引起明显副作用。LIA组更好的镇痛效果可能源于术后23小时的二次注射,未来研究需要进一步评估。两组在出院情况、生活质量和髋关节功能障碍方面未发现差异。
与单次股神经阻滞相比,局部浸润镇痛是THA术后疼痛管理的首选方法。