Binder Andrea
Department of Politics and International Studies, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Rev Int Polit Econ. 2019 Mar 1;26(2):313-336. doi: 10.1080/09692290.2019.1567571.
At first sight, Mexico appears to be a textbook example of a state affected by off-shore finance. Offshore financial services allow corporations and the wealthy to plan taxes, avoid regulations or to launder money. The literature holds that large, developing, open economies, with geographical proximity to offshore centers and problems of crime and corruption are particularly affected by offshoring. By this logic, we should expect Mexico to show a significant demand for offshore financial services. Yet, new empirical evidence derived from interviews and banking statistics suggests otherwise. Mexican firms and individuals make only limited use of offshore finance. The article explains why. Building on a Weberian notion of the state, the article shows that the historically exclusive nature of Mexico's state concentrates political and economic power such that the onshore economy offers similar rents for economic elites as offshoring. Moreover, in instances where economic actors use offshore services it is driven by banking, not taxation. These findings have two theoretical implications. First, they confirm that institutions matter, though differently than hitherto thought. Second, we must look beyond taxation to include banking into our analyses.
乍一看,墨西哥似乎是受离岸金融影响的国家的典型例子。离岸金融服务使企业和富人能够进行税务筹划、规避监管或洗钱。文献认为,大型、发展中、开放型经济体,由于地理位置靠近离岸中心以及存在犯罪和腐败问题,特别容易受到离岸业务的影响。按照这种逻辑,我们应该预期墨西哥对离岸金融服务有巨大需求。然而,来自访谈和银行统计数据的新实证证据却表明情况并非如此。墨西哥企业和个人对离岸金融的使用非常有限。本文解释了原因。基于韦伯式的国家概念,本文表明,墨西哥国家在历史上的排他性特征使得政治和经济权力集中,以至于境内经济为经济精英提供了与离岸业务类似的租金。此外,在经济行为体使用离岸服务的情况下,其驱动力是银行业务,而非税收。这些发现有两个理论意义。第一,它们证实了制度很重要,尽管其作用方式与以往的认识不同。第二,我们必须超越税收范畴,将银行业务纳入我们的分析之中。