Suppr超能文献

高频超声检查与颞下颌关节内紊乱研究诊断标准之间诊断一致性的评估。

The evaluation of agreement between high-frequency ultrasonography and research diagnostic criteria for the diagnosis of temporomandibular joint internal derangements.

作者信息

Eraslan Ravza, Kılıç Kerem, Etöz Meryem, Soydan Damla

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey.

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey.

出版信息

J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2020 Oct-Dec;20(4):387-393. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_136_20. Epub 2020 Oct 8.

Abstract

AIM

The aim of this study is to compare the diagnosis of patients with temporomandibular joint (TMJ) internal derangements which had been diagnosed using Research Diagnostic Criteria/Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) with the dynamic high resolution sonography findings.

SETTINGS AND DESIGN

Axis I section of RDC/TMD form had been applied to participants. Participants were divided into three groups as healthy TMJ, disc displacement with reduction, and disc displacement without reduction. The diagnoses had been compared with the dynamic high-resolution sonography findings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twelve of the patients had been treated with laser therapy, whereas 13 patients were treated with stabilization splint. Seventeen patients were treated with anterior repositioning splint ( = 42). After the application of different treatment modalities, the position of the articular disc had been determined with Axis I of RDC/ TMD form and dynamic high-resolution sonography. The findings were compared and statistically analyzed.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED

Statistical analyses of data were analyzed with Turcosa Cloud (Turcosa Ltd Co, Turkey).

RESULTS

For the right TMJ, pretreatment and posttreatment ultrasonography (USG) diagnoses and RDC/ TMD clinical diagnoses were found similar (κ = 0.125-0.008). No statistically significant relationship was found ( > 0.05). For the left TMJ, pretreatment USG diagnosis and RDC/TMD clinical diagnose were found similar (κ = 0.070). No statistically significant relationship was found ( > 0.05). For the left TMJ, posttreatment USG diagnosis and RDC/TMD clinical diagnose were compared. A statistically significant difference was found (κ = 0.256). A statistically significant relationship was found ( < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Axis 1 of RDC/TMD form which is used for the diagnosis of internal derangements and dynamic high resolution sonography was not found in the agreement.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较采用研究诊断标准/颞下颌关节紊乱病(RDC/TMD)诊断的颞下颌关节(TMJ)内紊乱患者的诊断结果与动态高分辨率超声检查结果。

设置与设计

将RDC/TMD表格的轴I部分应用于参与者。参与者被分为三组,即健康TMJ组、可复性盘移位组和不可复性盘移位组。将这些诊断结果与动态高分辨率超声检查结果进行比较。

材料与方法

12例患者接受了激光治疗,而13例患者接受了稳定合板治疗。17例患者接受了前伸复位合板治疗(n = 42)。在应用不同治疗方式后,使用RDC/TMD表格的轴I和动态高分辨率超声检查确定关节盘的位置。对结果进行比较并进行统计学分析。

所用统计分析方法

数据的统计分析使用Turcosa Cloud(土耳其Turcosa有限公司)进行。

结果

对于右侧TMJ,治疗前和治疗后的超声(USG)诊断与RDC/TMD临床诊断相似(κ = 0.125 - 0.008)。未发现统计学上的显著关系(P > 0.05)。对于左侧TMJ,治疗前USG诊断与RDC/TMD临床诊断相似(κ = 0.070)。未发现统计学上的显著关系(P > 0.05)。对于左侧TMJ,比较了治疗后USG诊断与RDC/TMD临床诊断。发现有统计学显著差异(κ = 0.256)。发现有统计学显著关系(P < 0.05)。

结论

用于诊断内紊乱的RDC/TMD表格轴1与动态高分辨率超声检查结果不一致。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4375/7814687/1d03c8fad3f8/JIPS-20-387-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验