Int J Prosthodont. 2021 Mar-Apr;34(2):173-182. doi: 10.11607/ijp.6836.
To compare the efficacy of low-dose laser therapy to that of conservative treatment using two different occlusal splints (stabilization and anterior repositioning splints) in patients with internal derangements of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ).
The study population consisted of patients with disc displacement with reduction diagnosed according to the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) Axis I and Axis II. In addition, disc displacement with reduction was confirmed in all patients using TMJ ultrasonography. These tests were conducted for 6 months with an interim control in the third month. The "clicking" sound from the joint on opening and closing the mouth and the extent to which the mouth opened vertically and laterally were assessed. In all, 20 patients received low-dose laser therapy, 20 were treated with a stabilization splint, and 20 were treated with an anterior repositioning splint. In addition, 10 untreated patients were included as a patient control group, and a further 10 healthy subjects were included as a healthy control group. Changes in the condition were assessed based on the results of the RDC/TMD Axis II and with the use of an algometer.
The anterior repositioning splint group showed improvement in the "clicking" sound during mouth opening. Lateral movement improved significantly in patients who received laser therapy. In the patient control group, the click disappeared during mouth opening, the algometrically determined pain improved, and the lateral movement increased. There were no statistically significant differences between groups in the improvement of vertical mouth movement or in the clicking sound during mouth closing.
Each treatment modality applied in this study separately produced positive results for the clicking sound, restrictions in vertical and lateral movements, and reduction of the pressure pain threshold observed in cases of TMJ irregularity. The decision regarding which treatment modality should be employed can be made based on the patient's symptoms. However, this study also indicates that TMJ derangements can resolve spontaneously when left untreated.
比较低剂量激光疗法与两种不同的咬合夹板(稳定和前伸定位夹板)保守治疗颞下颌关节(TMJ)内部紊乱的疗效。
研究人群包括根据颞下颌关节紊乱研究诊断标准(RDC/TMD)I 轴和 II 轴诊断为盘前移位伴复位的患者。此外,所有患者均通过 TMJ 超声检查确认存在盘前移位伴复位。这些测试进行了 6 个月,第三个月进行了中期对照。评估张口和闭口时关节的“咔哒”声以及垂直和侧向开口的程度。共有 20 名患者接受低剂量激光治疗,20 名患者接受稳定夹板治疗,20 名患者接受前伸定位夹板治疗。此外,还纳入了 10 名未治疗的患者作为患者对照组,10 名健康受试者作为健康对照组。根据 RDC/TMD II 轴的结果和使用压痛计评估病情变化。
前伸定位夹板组在张口时“咔哒”声改善。激光治疗组的侧向运动明显改善。在患者对照组中,张口时咔哒声消失,压痛计测定的疼痛改善,侧向运动增加。在改善垂直开口运动或闭口时的咔哒声方面,各组之间无统计学差异。
本研究中应用的每种治疗方式都分别对 TMJ 不规则引起的“咔哒”声、垂直和侧向运动受限以及压力疼痛阈值降低产生了积极的效果。可以根据患者的症状选择哪种治疗方式。然而,本研究还表明,TMJ 紊乱在未经治疗的情况下也可能自行缓解。