Zhu Yueqian, Wang Xiuxia, Wang Shujun, Zhou Naihui, Liu Ke
Department of Dermatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Ann Transl Med. 2020 Dec;8(24):1648. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-7167.
The main goal of excision of a pigmented nevus is to achieve an esthetically pleasing result. A single nevus can be removed by simple excision, whereas S-shaped suture can be used for the excision of 2 adjacent nevi. However, the choice of suturing method is based on the experience of the dermatologic surgeon, as there is no uniform standard for suture following the excision of 2 adjacent nevi. The aim of the present study was to determine whether S-shaped wound closure is appropriate for the excision of 2 adjacent nevi.
The outcomes of 21 patients who underwent simultaneous resection of 2 adjacent nevi were retrospectively reviewed. Of these patients, 17 chose S-shaped suture and 4 chose direct suture. Patients were followed-up for more than 6 months to review their postoperative scars. Differences between the 2 methods were compared based on the patient and observer scar assessment scale. Diameters and the proportional relationship between the 2 nevi were analyzed.
Patients who underwent S-shaped wound closure surgery were more satisfied compared to those who had direct suturing (P<0.05); the nevus diameter-to-spacing diameter ratio was 0.68±0.35:1:0.99±0.56 in the S-shaped wound closure group.
S-shaped wound closure following the excision of 2 adjacent nevi resulted in better patient satisfaction than the conventional direct suturing method.