Liu Dejian, Li Yanlin, Li Tao, Yu Yang, Cai Guofeng, Yang Guiran, Wang Guoliang
Department of Sports Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China.
Department of Trauma Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Yunnan University, Kunming, China.
Ann Transl Med. 2020 Dec;8(24):1656. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-7515.
To explore the location accuracy and early clinical outcomes of using a 3D-printed individualized navigation template to assist in the reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL).
A single center randomized control study was conducted. Patients with ACL injury were treated with a conventional operation or an operation assisted by a 3D-printed individualized navigation template (the 3D group). The primary endpoint was the accuracy of the actual reconstruction compared with the planned position.
There were 20 and 23 participants in the conventional group and the 3D group, respectively. There were no differences in the bone tunnel position between the actual postoperative position and the preoperative design in the 3D group (P>0.05). Compared with the 3D group, the positioning of the femoral tunnel was more inferior and shallower in the conventional group (P<0.05). The position of the tibia tunnel was closer to the anterior and medial edge of the tibial platform in the conventional group compared to the 3D group (P<0.05). The intraoperative positioning time was shorter in the 3D group than in the conventional group (3.3±1.0 . 5.9±1.8 minutes, P<0.001). The Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee scores did not differ between the two groups (P>0.05 for both), and all patients improved after surgery (P<0.001).
The 3D-printed individualized navigation template showed good location accuracy and resulted in reduced intraoperative positioning time compared to the traditional method for ACL reconstruction.
探讨使用3D打印个体化导航模板辅助前交叉韧带(ACL)重建的定位准确性及早期临床疗效。
进行单中心随机对照研究。ACL损伤患者接受传统手术或3D打印个体化导航模板辅助手术(3D组)。主要终点是实际重建与计划位置相比的准确性。
传统组和3D组分别有20例和23例参与者。3D组术后实际骨隧道位置与术前设计相比无差异(P>0.05)。与3D组相比,传统组股骨隧道定位更靠下且更浅(P<0.05)。与3D组相比,传统组胫骨隧道位置更靠近胫骨平台前缘和内侧缘(P<0.05)。3D组术中定位时间比传统组短(3.3±1.0 对5.9±1.8分钟,P<0.001)。两组间Lysholm和国际膝关节文献委员会评分无差异(两者均P>0.05),且所有患者术后均有改善(P<0.001)。
与传统ACL重建方法相比,3D打印个体化导航模板显示出良好的定位准确性,并缩短了术中定位时间。