J Adhes Dent. 2020;22(6):573-580. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a45514.
Purpose: The purpose of this multicenter study was to evaluate the survival and quality outcome of direct composite buildups in the anterior dentition based on representative sample sizes. Materials and Methods: At three university clinics in Germany, the survival and quality outcome of n = 667 direct composite buildups performed between 2001 and 2012 was evaluated in n = 198 participants. Survival outcomes were categorized as failure (F), survival (SR), or successful (S). Restorations still in place and without failure prior to follow-up (n = 567) were rated using modified USPHS/FDI criteria to obtain the quality outcome. Detailed failure analysis was done by means of Cox regression models. Results: The restricted mean for overall survival was 15.5 years. N = 576 restorations were classified as successful (S), n = 81 survived with repair (SR) and n = 8 failed (F). Two restorations were removed due to iatrogenic interventions. Overall survival rates after 2, 10, and 15 years were 98.8% (CI: 97.6 and 99.4), 91.7% (CI: 89.0 and 93.8), and 77.6% (CI: 72.2 and 82.2), respectively. Functional survival rates were 100.0%, 98.9% (CI: 97.5 and 99.5), and 98.5% (CI: 96.7 and 99.3), respectively. Clinical quality was rated as excellent or good for most restorations. The dominant failure mode was chipping; however, regression analysis did not detect any influence of the evaluated parameters “enlargement range,” “position in the jaw,” or “tooth type” on failure. Conclusion: This multicenter study represents the first of its type including clinical survival and quality data on 576 direct anterior composite buildups over a restricted mean follow-up of 15.5 years in a relatively large group of participants. In particular, functional survival was outstanding due to the clinical reliability of this treatment option, while simultaneously providing flexibility, reparability, and minimal invasiveness.
本多中心研究旨在评估基于代表性样本量的前牙直接复合树脂修复体的生存和质量结果。
在德国的三个大学诊所,对 2001 年至 2012 年间进行的 n = 667 例直接复合树脂修复体的 n = 198 名患者的生存和质量结果进行了评估。生存结果分为失败(F)、生存(SR)或成功(S)。在随访前未出现失败且仍在使用的修复体(n = 567)使用改良的 USPHS/FDI 标准进行评估,以获得质量结果。详细的失败分析采用 Cox 回归模型进行。
总体生存的限制均数为 15.5 年。n = 576 个修复体被归类为成功(S),n = 81 个修复体通过修复而存活(SR),n = 8 个修复体失败(F)。有 2 个修复体因医源性干预而被移除。2、10 和 15 年后的总体生存率分别为 98.8%(CI:97.6 和 99.4)、91.7%(CI:89.0 和 93.8)和 77.6%(CI:72.2 和 82.2)。功能生存率分别为 100.0%、98.9%(CI:97.5 和 99.5)和 98.5%(CI:96.7 和 99.3)。大多数修复体的临床质量被评为优秀或良好。主要的失败模式是碎裂;然而,回归分析并未发现评估参数“扩大范围”、“颌位”或“牙位”对失败有任何影响。
本多中心研究是首次对 576 例前牙直接复合树脂修复体进行临床生存和质量数据评估,这些修复体在一个相对较大的参与者群体中平均随访 15.5 年。特别是由于该治疗选择的临床可靠性,功能生存率非常出色,同时提供了灵活性、可修复性和最小的侵入性。