二级保健中兰索拉唑治疗持续性咽喉症状的随机对照试验(TOPPITS RCT)
Lansoprazole for persistent throat symptoms in secondary care: the TOPPITS RCT.
机构信息
Ear, Nose and Throat Department, The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
出版信息
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Jan;25(3):1-118. doi: 10.3310/hta25030.
BACKGROUND
Persistent throat symptoms are commonly attributed to 'laryngopharyngeal reflux'. Despite a limited evidence base, these symptoms are increasingly being treated in primary care with proton pump inhibitors.
OBJECTIVE
To assess the value of proton pump inhibitor therapy in patients with persistent throat symptoms.
DESIGN
This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised Phase III trial.
SETTING
This was a multicentre UK trial in eight UK ear, nose and throat departments.
PARTICIPANTS
A total of 346 participants aged ≥ 18 years with persistent throat symptoms and a Reflux Symptom Index score of ≥ 10, exclusive of the dyspepsia item, were recruited.
INTERVENTION
Random allocation (1 : 1 ratio) to either 30 mg of lansoprazole twice daily or matched placebo for 16 weeks.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE
Symptomatic response (i.e. total Reflux Symptom Index score after 16 weeks of therapy).
RESULTS
A total of 1427 patients were screened and 346 were randomised. The mean age was 52 years (standard deviation 13.7 years, range 20-84 years); 150 (43%) participants were male and 196 (57%) were female; 184 (53%) participants had a mild Reflux Symptom Index minus the heartburn/dyspepsia item and 162 (47%) had a severe Reflux Symptom Index minus the heartburn/dyspepsia item. A total of 172 patients were randomised to lansoprazole and 174 were randomised to placebo.
MAIN OUTCOMES
A total of 267 participants completed the primary end-point visit (lansoprazole, = 127; placebo, = 140), of whom 220 did so between 14 and 20 weeks post randomisation ('compliant' group); 102 received lansoprazole and 118 received placebo. The mean Reflux Symptom Index scores at baseline were similar [lansoprazole 22.0 (standard deviation 8.0), placebo 21.7 (standard deviation 7.1), overall 21.9 (standard deviation 7.5)]. The mean Reflux Symptom Index scores at 16 weeks reduced from baseline in both groups [overall 17.4 (standard deviation 9.9), lansoprazole 17.4 (standard deviation 9.9), placebo 15.6 (standard deviation 9.8)]. Lansoprazole participants had estimated Reflux Symptom Index scores at 16 weeks that were 1.9 points higher (worse) than those of placebo participants (95% confidence interval -0.3 to 4.2; = 0.096), adjusted for site and baseline severity.
SECONDARY OUTCOMES
Ninety-five (43%) participants achieved a Reflux Symptom Index score in the normal range (< 12) at 16 weeks: 42 (41%) in the lansoprazole group and 53 (45%) in the placebo group. A total of 226 participants completed the end-of-trial follow-up visit (lansoprazole, = 109; placebo, = 117), of whom 181 were 'compliant'. The mean Reflux Symptom Index scores at 12 months reduced from baseline in both groups [lansoprazole 16.0 (standard deviation 10.8), placebo 13.6 (standard deviation 9.6), overall 14.7 (standard deviation 10.2)]. A total of 87 (48%) participants achieved a Reflux Symptom Index score in the normal range at 12 months: 33 (40%) in the lansoprazole group and 54 (55%) in the placebo group. Likewise, the Comprehensive Reflux Symptom Score and Laryngopharyngeal Reflux - Health Related Quality of Life total scores and subscales all showed very similar changes in the lansoprazole and placebo cohorts at both 16 weeks and 12 months.
LIMITATIONS
Drop-out rate and compliance are issues in pragmatic clinical trials. The Trial Of Proton Pump Inhibitors in Throat Symptoms (TOPPITS) aimed to detect clinically relevant difference with 90% power. The 346 randomised participants reduced to 283 at the primary end point; 267 completed the primary outcome measure, 220 within the protocol time scale. Despite this, the powers to detect the clinically relevant difference in Reflux Symptom Index score at 16 weeks were 82% (compliant comparison) and 89% (pragmatic comparison). The lack of difference between lansoprazole and placebo is generalisable across NHS clinics.
CONCLUSIONS
Participants on lansoprazole did not report significantly better outcomes than participants on placebo on any of the three patient-reported outcome tools (Reflux Symptom Index, Comprehensive Reflux Symptom Score and Laryngopharyngeal Reflux - Health Related Quality of Life). This multicentre, pragmatic, powered, definitive Phase III trial found no evidence of benefit for patients by treating persistent throat symptoms with lansoprazole.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN38578686 and EudraCT number 2013-004249-17.
FUNDING
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in ; Vol. 25, No. 3. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
背景
持续性咽喉症状通常归因于“咽喉反流”。尽管证据有限,但这些症状在初级保健中越来越多地使用质子泵抑制剂进行治疗。
目的
评估质子泵抑制剂治疗持续性咽喉症状患者的疗效。
设计
这是一项双盲、安慰剂对照、随机 III 期试验。
地点
英国 8 个耳鼻喉科部门的多中心英国试验。
参与者
共招募了 346 名年龄≥18 岁、持续性咽喉症状且反流症状指数(Reflux Symptom Index,RSI)评分≥10(不包括消化不良项目)的患者。
干预措施
将参与者随机分配(1:1 比例)接受 30 毫克兰索拉唑每日 2 次或匹配安慰剂治疗 16 周。
主要观察指标
治疗 16 周后的症状缓解情况(即治疗后 RSI 总评分)。
结果
共有 1427 名患者接受了筛查,其中 346 名被随机分组。平均年龄为 52 岁(标准差 13.7 岁,范围 20-84 岁);150 名(43%)参与者为男性,196 名(57%)为女性;184 名(53%)参与者的 RSI 减去烧心/消化不良项目后轻度,162 名(47%)为严重。172 名参与者被随机分配至兰索拉唑组,174 名被随机分配至安慰剂组。
主要结局
共有 267 名参与者完成了主要终点访视(兰索拉唑组,n=127;安慰剂组,n=140),其中 220 名在随机分组后 14-20 周完成(“依从性”组);102 名接受兰索拉唑治疗,118 名接受安慰剂治疗。两组基线时的 RSI 评分相似[兰索拉唑组 22.0(标准差 8.0),安慰剂组 21.7(标准差 7.1),总体 21.9(标准差 7.5)]。两组在治疗 16 周后 RSI 评分均较基线降低[总体 17.4(标准差 9.9),兰索拉唑组 17.4(标准差 9.9),安慰剂组 15.6(标准差 9.8)]。兰索拉唑组参与者治疗 16 周后的 RSI 评分比安慰剂组高 1.9 分(更差)(置信区间-0.3 至 4.2;P=0.096),调整了地点和基线严重程度。
次要结局
95 名(43%)参与者在 16 周时达到 RSI 评分正常范围(<12):兰索拉唑组 42 名(41%),安慰剂组 53 名(45%)。共有 226 名参与者完成了试验结束随访(兰索拉唑组,n=109;安慰剂组,n=117),其中 181 名参与者“依从”。两组在 12 个月时的 RSI 评分均较基线降低[兰索拉唑组 16.0(标准差 10.8),安慰剂组 13.6(标准差 9.6),总体 14.7(标准差 10.2)]。共有 87 名(48%)参与者在 12 个月时达到 RSI 评分正常范围:兰索拉唑组 33 名(40%),安慰剂组 54 名(55%)。同样,兰索拉唑组和安慰剂组在 16 周和 12 个月时,综合反流症状评分(Comprehensive Reflux Symptom Score)和咽喉反流-健康相关生活质量(Laryngopharyngeal Reflux - Health Related Quality of Life)总评分及各亚量表的变化也非常相似。
局限性
在实用临床试验中,失访率和依从性是问题。咽喉反流症状质子泵抑制剂试验(TOPPITS)旨在以 90%的效能检测出有临床意义的差异。346 名随机参与者减少至主要终点的 283 名;267 名参与者完成了主要结局测量,220 名在方案时间范围内完成。尽管如此,在 16 周时检测 RSI 评分临床相关差异的效能仍分别为 82%(依从性比较)和 89%(实用比较)。兰索拉唑组和安慰剂组在反流症状指数评分上的差异无统计学意义,可以推广到整个 NHS 诊所。
结论
与安慰剂组相比,兰索拉唑组在任何三种患者报告的结局工具(反流症状指数、综合反流症状评分和咽喉反流-健康相关生活质量)上均未报告显著更好的结局。这项多中心、实用、有能力的 III 期试验未发现质子泵抑制剂治疗持续性咽喉症状对患者有获益。
试验注册
当前对照试验 ISRCTN38578686 和 EudraCT 编号 2013-004249-17。
资金
本项目由英国国家卫生与保健优化研究所(NIHR)健康技术评估计划资助,将在 ; Vol. 25, No. 3 中全文发表。有关该项目的更多信息,请访问 NIHR 期刊库网站。