• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开放式办公空间中的幸福感:办公环境特点和心理社会工作条件的作用。

Well-being in open space offices: The role of office features and psychosocial working conditions.

机构信息

Occupational and Consumer Psychology, University of Freiburg, Germany.

出版信息

Work. 2021;68(2):317-332. doi: 10.3233/WOR-203378.

DOI:10.3233/WOR-203378
PMID:33492262
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There has been a trend to implement open space offices: wide-spread office floors with modern and colourful furniture. However, there is limited scientific knowledge on the effects of Open Space Offices (OSO). Studies are scarce and show heterogeneous results.

OBJECTIVE

By using the Job Demands-Resources model as a conceptual framework, the present study aimed at investigating the influence of subjective and objective features of the OSO (i.e., office size, desk-sharing, openness) next to classical psychosocial working conditions (i.e., demands, resources) on irritation and subjective well-being.

METHODS

Cross-sectional and longitudinal data out of four different organisations (490 participants, 43.73 years of age, SD = 12.02) were used.

RESULTS

Results showed that both features of the OSO and working conditions play a role in well-being at work. In line with current studies, job demands and resources contributed more to irritation and subjective well-being than features of the OSO.

CONCLUSION

The influence of traditional psychosocial working conditions has so far been neglected in research on OSOs. However, their contribution to employees' well-being next to features of the OSO could explain the heterogeneous findings of the existing research on well-being in OSOs. Thus, when implementing OSOs, employees' well-being can only be enhanced if working conditions are targeted in parallel.

摘要

背景

开放式办公空间的趋势已经出现:广泛采用现代和多彩的家具的开放式办公楼层。然而,关于开放式办公空间(OSO)的影响,科学知识有限。研究稀缺且结果各异。

目的

本研究以工作要求-资源模型为概念框架,旨在调查 OSO 的主观和客观特征(即办公室大小、共用办公桌、开放性)以及经典的心理社会工作条件(即需求、资源)对刺激和主观幸福感的影响。

方法

使用来自四个不同组织的横截面和纵向数据(490 名参与者,年龄 43.73 岁,标准差=12.02)。

结果

结果表明,OSO 的特征和工作条件都对工作幸福感起着作用。与当前的研究一致,工作要求和资源对刺激和主观幸福感的贡献大于 OSO 的特征。

结论

在 OSO 研究中,传统的心理社会工作条件的影响迄今为止一直被忽视。然而,它们对员工幸福感的贡献除了 OSO 的特征之外,还可以解释现有关于 OSO 幸福感的研究结果的异质性。因此,在实施 OSO 时,如果要针对工作条件进行目标设定,才能提高员工的幸福感。

相似文献

1
Well-being in open space offices: The role of office features and psychosocial working conditions.开放式办公空间中的幸福感:办公环境特点和心理社会工作条件的作用。
Work. 2021;68(2):317-332. doi: 10.3233/WOR-203378.
2
The relationship between office type and job satisfaction: Testing a multiple mediation model through ease of interaction and well-being.办公类型与工作满意度的关系:通过互动便利性和幸福感检验多重中介模型。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2018 May 1;44(3):330-334. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3707. Epub 2018 Jan 15.
3
Office type's association to employees' welfare: Three studies.办公类型与员工福利的关联:三项研究。
Work. 2016 Aug 12;54(4):779-90. doi: 10.3233/WOR-162361.
4
Does office space occupation matter? The role of the number of persons per enclosed office space, psychosocial work characteristics, and environmental satisfaction in the physical and mental health of employees.办公空间占用情况是否重要?封闭办公空间内人数、心理社会工作特征和环境满意度对员工身心健康的作用。
Indoor Air. 2016 Oct;26(5):755-67. doi: 10.1111/ina.12263. Epub 2015 Dec 1.
5
Methodological and conceptual issues regarding occupational psychosocial coronary heart disease epidemiology.职业心理社会因素与冠心病流行病学的方法学和概念性问题
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2016 May 1;42(3):251-5. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3557. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
6
Office design and health: a systematic review.办公室设计与健康:一项系统综述。
N Z Med J. 2017 Dec 15;130(1467):39-49.
7
Work environment perceptions following relocation to open-plan offices: A twelve-month longitudinal study.迁至开放式办公室后的工作环境认知:一项为期十二个月的纵向研究。
Work. 2015 Jan 1;50(2):221-8. doi: 10.3233/WOR-131798.
8
The work environment pilot: An experiment to determine the optimal office design for a technology company.工作环境试点:一项旨在确定科技公司最佳办公设计的实验。
PLoS One. 2020 May 19;15(5):e0232943. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232943. eCollection 2020.
9
Working conditions under multiple exposures: A cross-sectional study of private sector administrative workers.多种暴露情况下的工作条件:对私营部门行政工作人员的横断面研究
Work. 2015;51(4):781-9. doi: 10.3233/WOR-152025.
10
Choosing where to work at work - towards a theoretical model of benefits and risks of activity-based flexible offices.工作时选择工作地点——构建基于活动的灵活办公场所利弊的理论模型
Ergonomics. 2017 Apr;60(4):467-486. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2016.1188220. Epub 2016 Jul 6.

引用本文的文献

1
The influence of psychosocial factors on productivity when implementing new office designs - a longitudinal explorative study in the Swedish public sector.实施新办公设计时社会心理因素对工作效率的影响——瑞典公共部门的一项纵向探索性研究
BMC Public Health. 2025 May 23;25(1):1894. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22953-4.
2
Why serendipitous informal knowledge sharing interactions are key to boundary spanning and creativity.为什么偶然的非正式知识共享互动对跨越边界和创造力至关重要。
Work. 2022;72(4):1673-1687. doi: 10.3233/WOR-211275.
3
Satisfaction with activity-support and physical home-workspace characteristics in relation to mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic.
在新冠疫情期间,对与心理健康相关的活动支持和家庭物理工作空间特征的满意度。
J Environ Psychol. 2022 Jun;81:101826. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101826. Epub 2022 May 27.