Suppr超能文献

Örebro 肌肉骨骼疼痛问卷和工作评估分诊工具在选择脊柱疾病工人干预措施方面的准确性。

Accuracy of the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire and Work Assessment Triage Tool for selecting interventions in workers with spinal conditions.

机构信息

Department of Physical Therapy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.

Grenoble Alpes University, Grenoble, France.

出版信息

J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2021;34(3):355-362. doi: 10.3233/BMR-200169.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Accurate clinical decision support tools may help clinicians select appropriate interventions for patients with spinal conditions. The Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire (ÖMPQ) is a screening questionnaire extensively studied as a predictive tool. The Work Assessment Triage Tool (WATT) is a clinical decision support tool developed to help select interventions for injured workers.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the classification accuracy of the ÖMPQ and WATT to clinician recommendations for selecting interventions leading to a successful return to work in patients with spinal conditions.

METHODS

A secondary analysis was undertaken of data from injured workers with spinal conditions assessed between 2013 and 2016. We considered it a success if the workers did not receive wage replacement benefits 30 days after assessment. Analysis included positive likelihood ratio (LR+) as an indicator of predictive accuracy.

RESULTS

Within the database, 2,872 patients had complete data on the ÖMPQ, WATT, and clinician recommendations. At 30 days, the ÖMPQ was most accurate for identifying treatments that lead to successful outcomes with a LR+= 1.51 (95% Confidence Interval 1.26-1.82) compared to 1.05 (95% Confidence Interval 1.02-1.09) for clinicians, and 0.85 (95% Confidence Interval 0.79-0.91) for the WATT.

CONCLUSIONS

All tool recommendations had poor accuracy, however the ÖMPQ demonstrated significantly better results.

摘要

背景

准确的临床决策支持工具可以帮助临床医生为脊柱疾病患者选择合适的干预措施。Örebro 肌肉骨骼疼痛问卷(ÖMPQ)是一种经过广泛研究的预测工具。工作评估分诊工具(WATT)是一种临床决策支持工具,旨在帮助选择受伤工人的干预措施。

目的

比较 ÖMPQ 和 WATT 与临床医生建议选择干预措施以帮助脊柱疾病患者成功重返工作岗位的分类准确性。

方法

对 2013 年至 2016 年间评估的患有脊柱疾病的受伤工人的数据进行了二次分析。如果工人在评估后 30 天内未获得工资替代福利,则认为是成功的。分析包括阳性似然比(LR+)作为预测准确性的指标。

结果

在数据库中,2872 名患者的 ÖMPQ、WATT 和临床医生建议的完整数据。在 30 天内,ÖMPQ 最能准确识别导致成功结果的治疗方法,LR+=1.51(95%置信区间 1.26-1.82),而临床医生为 1.05(95%置信区间 1.02-1.09),WATT 为 0.85(95%置信区间 0.79-0.91)。

结论

所有工具建议的准确性都很差,但是 ÖMPQ 显示出明显更好的结果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验