Suppr超能文献

富含亮氨酸的α-2-糖蛋白1和干细胞因子在结直肠癌诊断及随访中的诊断效能

Diagnostic performances of leucine-rich α-2-glycoprotein 1 and stem cell factor for diagnosis and follow-up of colorectal cancer.

作者信息

Fouda Manar S, Aljarwani Rokaia M, Aboul-Enein Khaled, Omran Mohamed M

机构信息

Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, Helwan University, Ain Helwan, Cairo, 11795, Egypt.

Clinical Pathology Department, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.

出版信息

J Genet Eng Biotechnol. 2021 Jan 25;19(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s43141-021-00116-3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most frequently diagnosed tumors worldwide with high mortality and morbidity. There is an urgent need for biomarkers to improve the outcomes and early detection of CRC. The sensitivity of traditional CRC tumor markers (carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9)) is not ideal. The levels of leucine-rich-alpha-2-glycoprotein 1 (LRG1) and stem cell factor (SCF) were evaluated, but the combined value of both markers is unclear. This case-control study included four groups: CRC patients before treatments (n = 22), CRC patients after treatments (n = 26), 20 patients with benign tumor, and 20 healthy subjects. Levels of routine biochemical and hematological markers, traditional tumor markers (CA19.9 and CEA), and candidate markers (LRG1 and SCF) were determined. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis and area receiver-operating characteristic analysis (ROC) were used for evaluation the diagnostic performances of single and combined markers.

RESULTS

No significance difference in traditional tumor markers CEA, CA 19.9, and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were found among study groups. SCF, LRG1, and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) were significantly decreased (p < 0.05) in non-treated CRC patients than after treated CRC. The combination between SCF and LRG1 showed highly significant difference in CRC patients compared with benign, healthy subjects, and among CRC groups (treated and non-treated) (p < 0.0001). The highest areas under curve (AUCs) were observed when LRG1 was used as a single predictor for discriminating CRC from healthy (0.87), benign (0.84), and non-treated CRC vs treated CRC (0.82). AUCs were jumped to 0.90, 0.84, and 0.84 when LRG1 and SCF were combined.

CONCLUSION

Our study revealed that LRG1 and SCF were potential diagnostic and follow-up markers for CRC.

摘要

背景

结直肠癌(CRC)是全球最常被诊断出的肿瘤之一,死亡率和发病率都很高。迫切需要生物标志物来改善结直肠癌的治疗效果和早期检测。传统的结直肠癌肿瘤标志物(癌胚抗原(CEA)和糖类抗原19-9(CA19-9))的敏感性并不理想。对富含亮氨酸的α-2-糖蛋白1(LRG1)和干细胞因子(SCF)的水平进行了评估,但这两种标志物的联合价值尚不清楚。这项病例对照研究包括四组:治疗前的结直肠癌患者(n = 22)、治疗后的结直肠癌患者(n = 26)、20例良性肿瘤患者和20名健康受试者。测定了常规生化和血液学标志物、传统肿瘤标志物(CA19.9和CEA)以及候选标志物(LRG1和SCF)的水平。采用单因素和多因素逻辑回归分析以及受试者工作特征曲线分析(ROC)来评估单一和联合标志物的诊断性能。

结果

研究组之间在传统肿瘤标志物CEA、CA 19.9和中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)方面未发现显著差异。未治疗的结直肠癌患者的SCF、LRG1和血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)显著低于治疗后的结直肠癌患者(p < 0.05)。与良性、健康受试者以及结直肠癌组(治疗和未治疗)相比,SCF和LRG1的联合在结直肠癌患者中显示出高度显著差异(p < 0.0001)。当将LRG1用作区分结直肠癌与健康人群(0.87)、良性人群(0.84)以及未治疗的结直肠癌与治疗后的结直肠癌(0.82)的单一预测指标时,观察到最高的曲线下面积(AUC)。当LRG1和SCF联合使用时,AUC分别跃升至0.90、0.84和0.84。

结论

我们的研究表明,LRG1和SCF是结直肠癌潜在的诊断和随访标志物。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验