Davson J, Jones D M, Turner L
Department of Pathology, University of Manchester, UK.
Br J Surg. 1988 Mar;75(3):267-71. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800750327.
A retrospective and comparative study of 127 case reports of Meleney's postoperative progressive synergistic gangrene and of 62 examples of postoperative amoebic skin gangrene, showed that these two entities were clinically indistinguishable and that therefore a purely clinical diagnosis of Meleney's gangrene could not be made. Furthermore, a critical appraisal of the bacteriological data indicated that a certain diagnosis of Meleney's gangrene cannot be provided by the clinical bacteriologist. Finally, the histological features were entirely non-specific thus precluding a definitive diagnosis by the histopathologist. If Meleney's entity cannot be diagnosed its existence becomes debatable. The alternative diagnosis of cutaneous amoebiasis is advanced for consideration. Several of the outstanding features of Meleney's progressive gangrene, hitherto unexplained, are better understood if Entamoeba histolytica is accepted as the prime cause rather than bacteria.
一项对127例梅勒尼术后进行性协同性坏疽病例报告和62例术后阿米巴性皮肤坏疽病例的回顾性比较研究表明,这两种病症在临床上无法区分,因此无法单纯通过临床诊断出梅勒尼坏疽。此外,对细菌学数据的批判性评估表明,临床细菌学家无法对梅勒尼坏疽做出确切诊断。最后,组织学特征完全不具有特异性,因此组织病理学家也无法做出明确诊断。如果无法诊断出梅勒尼病症,那么其存在就值得怀疑。提出将皮肤阿米巴病作为替代诊断以供考虑。如果将溶组织内阿米巴而非细菌视为主要病因,那么梅勒尼进行性坏疽的几个迄今无法解释的突出特征就能得到更好的理解。