• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种静脉使用苯二氮䓬类药物(咪达唑仑和瑞马唑仑)引起长期镇静性药物耐受的小型猪模型。

A miniature pig model of pharmacological tolerance to long-term sedation with the intravenous benzodiazepines; midazolam and remimazolam.

机构信息

Research Department, Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Mishima, Osaka, 618-8585, Japan.

Biomed Contextm, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Pharmacol. 2021 Apr 5;896:173886. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2021.173886. Epub 2021 Jan 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejphar.2021.173886
PMID:33493482
Abstract

As a new and ultra fast-acting IV benzodiazepine, pharmacological tolerance may be anticipated during long-term treatment with remimazolam e.g. in intensive care. In this context, tolerance is particularly relevant for withdrawal syndrome. However, apart from primates, existing models of sedative tolerance are unsuitable for remimazolam due to its excessive metabolic clearance (i.e. in rodents) or paradoxical responses (in dogs). Pigs are a well-established model species, especially for in-vivo drug safety studies, and appear a well suited as model for evaluation of remimazolam. In a series of experiments from dose-range-finding bolus and infusion studies through to 28-day continuous level sedation, we established a viable model of intravenous benzodiazepine sedation in NIBS micropigs to compare tolerance development during 28 days sedation with either midazolam or remimazolam. Dose increases after 28 days were lower for remimazolam (0 to 3-fold) than for midazolam (2 to 4-fold) and recovery times were approximately 40% faster for remimazolam vs midazolam. Tolerance to remimazolam is therefore likely in long-term human sedation and may be less than that seen for midazolam.

摘要

作为一种新型超快速起效的 IV 苯二氮䓬类药物,在重症监护中长期使用瑞马唑仑(例如)时可能会出现药物耐受性。在这种情况下,耐受性对于戒断综合征特别重要。然而,除灵长类动物外,由于其代谢清除率过高(即啮齿动物)或反常反应(犬),现有的镇静耐受性模型不适合瑞马唑仑。猪是一种成熟的模式物种,特别是用于体内药物安全性研究,并且似乎非常适合作为评估瑞马唑仑的模型。在一系列从剂量范围发现的推注和输注研究到 28 天连续镇静水平的实验中,我们建立了一种可行的尼布斯微型猪静脉注射苯二氮䓬类镇静模型,以比较在 28 天镇静期间咪达唑仑或瑞马唑仑的耐受性发展。与咪达唑仑(2 至 4 倍)相比,28 天后瑞马唑仑的剂量增加(0 至 3 倍)较低,恢复时间比咪达唑仑快约 40%。因此,瑞马唑仑在长期人类镇静中可能会产生耐受性,并且可能比咪达唑仑的耐受性低。

相似文献

1
A miniature pig model of pharmacological tolerance to long-term sedation with the intravenous benzodiazepines; midazolam and remimazolam.一种静脉使用苯二氮䓬类药物(咪达唑仑和瑞马唑仑)引起长期镇静性药物耐受的小型猪模型。
Eur J Pharmacol. 2021 Apr 5;896:173886. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2021.173886. Epub 2021 Jan 23.
2
A placebo- and midazolam-controlled phase I single ascending-dose study evaluating the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of remimazolam (CNS 7056): Part I. Safety, efficacy, and basic pharmacokinetics.一项安慰剂和咪达唑仑对照的 I 期单递增剂量研究,评估 remimazolam(CNS 7056)的安全性、药代动力学和药效学:第 I 部分。安全性、疗效和基本药代动力学。
Anesth Analg. 2012 Aug;115(2):274-83. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31823f0c28. Epub 2011 Dec 20.
3
A placebo- and midazolam-controlled phase I single ascending-dose study evaluating the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of remimazolam (CNS 7056): Part II. Population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling and simulation.一项安慰剂和咪达唑仑对照的 I 期单递增剂量研究,评估雷米唑仑(CNS 7056)的安全性、药代动力学和药效学:第二部分。群体药代动力学和药效学建模与模拟。
Anesth Analg. 2012 Aug;115(2):284-96. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e318241f68a. Epub 2012 Jan 16.
4
Impact of concurrent remifentanil on the sedative effects of remimazolam, midazolam and propofol in cynomolgus monkeys.氯雷他定对猕猴咪达唑仑、依托咪酯和丙泊酚镇静效果的影响。
Eur J Pharmacol. 2021 Jan 5;890:173639. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2020.173639. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
5
Safety and Efficacy of Remimazolam Compared With Placebo and Midazolam for Moderate Sedation During Bronchoscopy.雷米唑仑用于支气管镜检查中中度镇静时的安全性和疗效与安慰剂和咪达唑仑的比较。
Chest. 2019 Jan;155(1):137-146. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2018.09.015. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
6
Randomized Crossover Trial to Compare Abuse Liability of Intravenous Remimazolam Versus Intravenous Midazolam and Placebo in Recreational Central Nervous System Depressant Users.随机交叉试验比较静脉注射瑞马唑仑与咪达唑仑和安慰剂在娱乐性中枢神经系统抑制剂使用者中的滥用倾向。
J Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Sep;60(9):1189-1197. doi: 10.1002/jcph.1614. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
7
Sedation outcomes for remimazolam, a new benzodiazepine.瑞马唑仑(一种新型苯二氮䓬类药物)镇静效果评价。
J Oral Sci. 2021 Jun 29;63(3):209-211. doi: 10.2334/josnusd.21-0051. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
8
A phase IIb study comparing the safety and efficacy of remimazolam and midazolam in patients undergoing colonoscopy.一项比较雷米加佐仑和咪达唑仑在结肠镜检查患者中安全性和有效性的 IIb 期研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 May;83(5):984-92. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.08.062. Epub 2015 Sep 9.
9
Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Remimazolam (CNS 7056) after Continuous Infusion in Healthy Male Volunteers: Part I. Pharmacokinetics and Clinical Pharmacodynamics.雷米佐胺(CNS 7056)在健康男性志愿者中连续输注后的药代动力学和药效学:第一部分。药代动力学和临床药效学。
Anesthesiology. 2020 Apr;132(4):636-651. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003103.
10
A Phase IIa, randomized, double-blind study of remimazolam (CNS 7056) versus midazolam for sedation in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.一项关于瑞米唑仑(CNS 7056)与咪达唑仑在上消化道内镜检查中镇静作用的IIa期随机双盲研究。
Anesth Analg. 2015 Apr;120(4):771-80. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000548.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of effect of remimazolam and propofol on respiration of patients under deep sedation for colonoscopy: a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial.瑞马唑仑与丙泊酚对结肠镜检查深度镇静患者呼吸影响的比较:一项前瞻性多中心随机对照试验
Eur J Med Res. 2025 Apr 7;30(1):250. doi: 10.1186/s40001-025-02519-1.
2
Two Cases of Inadequate Response to Remimazolam.两例对瑞马唑仑反应不足的病例。
Cureus. 2023 Jul 27;15(7):e42576. doi: 10.7759/cureus.42576. eCollection 2023 Jul.
3
Remimazolam: An Updated Review of a New Sedative and Anaesthetic.
雷米唑仑:一种新型镇静和麻醉药物的更新综述。
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2022 Nov 15;16:3957-3974. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S384155. eCollection 2022.
4
Remimazolam: Non-Clinical and Clinical Profile of a New Sedative/Anesthetic Agent.瑞马唑仑:一种新型镇静/麻醉剂的非临床和临床概况
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Jul 20;12:690875. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.690875. eCollection 2021.