Department of Biomedical Sciences, Ross University School of Veterinary Medicine, Basseterre, Saint Kitts and Nevis; Department of Veterinary Tropical Diseases, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Ross University School of Veterinary Medicine, Basseterre, Saint Kitts and Nevis.
Vaccine. 2022 Mar 8;40(11):1674-1679. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.01.029. Epub 2021 Jan 23.
Non-live rabies vaccines have been associated with both beneficial and detrimental effects on host population morbidity and mortality rates to unrelated infections in people and animals, and these non-specific effects may differ by sex. Previous animal studies may have been affected by bias, including selection bias due to loss to follow up in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We previously reported results of an RCT in dogs on the effect of primary rabies vaccine administered at 6 weeks of age on all-cause mortality over a 7-week follow-up period, in a high-mortality population of owned dogs. Here, we report the results from the same trial of a second vaccination at 13 weeks of age, compared to a primary vaccination. Because a relatively high proportion of study subjects (30%) were lost to follow-up in the RCT, we also conducted an analysis to control for possible selection bias over both periods (6 to 13 weeks and 13 to 20 weeks of age). We found that primary rabies vaccination at 6 weeks of age substantially increased the hazard of death from all causes over the next 7 weeks among females (hazard ratio [HR] 2.69, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.27-5.69), but not among males (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.32-2.59). Among survivors, administration of a second dose of rabies vaccine at 13 weeks of age was associated with a decreased hazard of death among males (HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.10-1.02) but not females (HR 1.64, 95% CI 0.59-4.58), when compared to the group receiving their first dose at this age. Based on our causal assumptions, we show that these results were not affected by selection bias. In this high-mortality dog population, receipt of a non-live rabies vaccine substantially affected all-cause mortality rates, with this effect being strongly modified by sex.
非活性狂犬病疫苗与人类和动物与无关感染相关的宿主人群发病率和死亡率的有益和有害影响有关,这些非特异性影响可能因性别而异。先前的动物研究可能受到偏倚的影响,包括由于随机对照试验(RCT)中失访而导致的选择偏倚。我们之前报道了一项关于在 6 周龄时给狗接种初级狂犬病疫苗对高死亡率狗群中 7 周随访期间全因死亡率影响的 RCT 结果。在这里,我们报告了相同试验中在 13 周龄时进行第二次接种的结果,与初级接种相比。由于研究对象中有相当高的比例(30%)在 RCT 中失访,我们还进行了一项分析,以控制两个时期(6 至 13 周和 13 至 20 周龄)的可能选择偏倚。我们发现,6 周龄时进行初级狂犬病疫苗接种会大大增加女性在接下来的 7 周内因各种原因死亡的风险(危险比[HR]2.69,95%置信区间[CI]1.27-5.69),但在男性中没有(HR 0.91,95% CI 0.32-2.59)。在幸存者中,与在这个年龄接受第一剂疫苗的组相比,在 13 周龄时给予第二剂狂犬病疫苗与男性死亡风险降低相关(HR 0.33,95% CI 0.10-1.02),但与女性无关(HR 1.64,95% CI 0.59-4.58)。根据我们的因果假设,我们表明这些结果不受选择偏倚的影响。在这个高死亡率的狗群中,接种非活性狂犬病疫苗会极大地影响全因死亡率,而这种影响会因性别而强烈改变。