• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者在癌症护理连续体中过渡时,是否有改善护理的机会? 范围综述方案。

Are there opportunities to improve care as patients transition through the cancer care continuum? A scoping review protocol.

机构信息

Department of Community Health Sciences & O'Brien Institute for Public Health, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Department of Oncology & Arnie Charbonneau Cancer Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 25;11(1):e043374. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043374.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043374
PMID:33495258
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7839915/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Transitions in Care (TiC) are vulnerable periods in care delivery associated with adverse events, increased cost and decreased patient satisfaction. Patients with cancer encounter many transitions during their care journey due to improved survival rates and the complexity of treatment. Collectively, improving TiC is particularly important among patients with cancer. The objective of this scoping review is to synthesise and map the existing literature regarding TiC among patients with cancer in order to explore opportunities to improve TiC among patients with cancer.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This scoping review will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis-Scoping Review Extension and the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. The PubMed cancer filter and underlying search strategy will be tailored to each database (Embase, Cochrane, CINAHL and PsycINFO) and combined with search terms for TiC. Grey literature and references of included studies will be searched. The search will include studies published from database inception until 9 February 2020. Quantitative and qualitative studies will be included if they describe transitions between any type of healthcare provider or institution among patients with cancer. Descriptive statistics will summarise study characteristics and quantitative data of included studies. Qualitative data will be synthesised using thematic analysis.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Our objective is to synthesise and map the existing evidence; therefore, ethical approval is not required. Evidence gaps around TiC will inform a programme of research aimed to improve high-risk transitions among patients with cancer. The findings of this scoping review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and widely presented at academic conferences. More importantly, decision makers and patients will be provided a summary of the findings, along with data from a companion study, to prioritise TiC in need of interventions to improve continuity of care for patients with cancer.

摘要

简介

过渡护理(TiC)是护理提供过程中的脆弱时期,与不良事件、成本增加和患者满意度降低有关。由于癌症患者的生存率提高和治疗的复杂性,他们在护理过程中会经历许多过渡。总的来说,改善癌症患者的 TiC 尤为重要。本综述的目的是综合和绘制现有的关于癌症患者 TiC 的文献,以探索改善癌症患者 TiC 的机会。

方法和分析

本综述将遵循系统评价和荟萃分析扩展的首选报告项目和 Joanna Briggs 研究所方法。将根据每个数据库(Embase、Cochrane、CINAHL 和 PsycINFO)调整 PubMed 癌症过滤器和基础搜索策略,并结合 TiC 的搜索词。将搜索包括从数据库创建开始到 2020 年 2 月 9 日发表的研究。如果研究描述了癌症患者之间任何类型的医疗保健提供者或机构之间的过渡,则将纳入定量和定性研究。将使用主题分析对定性数据进行综合。

伦理和传播

我们的目标是综合和绘制现有的证据;因此,不需要伦理批准。TiC 方面的证据差距将为旨在改善癌症患者高风险过渡的研究计划提供信息。本综述的结果将发表在同行评议的期刊上,并在学术会议上广泛介绍。更重要的是,决策者和患者将获得研究结果的摘要,以及来自伴随研究的数据,以确定需要干预的 TiC,以改善癌症患者的护理连续性。

相似文献

1
Are there opportunities to improve care as patients transition through the cancer care continuum? A scoping review protocol.患者在癌症护理连续体中过渡时,是否有改善护理的机会? 范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 25;11(1):e043374. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043374.
2
Determinants of implementing artificial intelligence-based clinical decision support tools in healthcare: a scoping review protocol.基于人工智能的临床决策支持工具在医疗保健中的应用的决定因素:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Feb 23;13(2):e068373. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068373.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
Are there opportunities to improve care as patients transition through the cancer care continuum? A scoping review.在患者贯穿癌症护理连续过程中,是否存在改善护理的机会?一项范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 12;14(12):e078210. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078210.
5
Efforts to strengthen anatomic pathology diagnostic services for cancer in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review protocol.加强撒哈拉以南非洲地区癌症解剖病理学诊断服务的努力:一项范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 10;15(2):e089425. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089425.
6
Protocol for a scoping review of digital health for older adults with cancer and their families.针对患有癌症的老年人及其家人的数字健康范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Aug 26;10(8):e038876. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038876.
7
Ethics of Procuring and Using Organs or Tissue from Infants and Newborns for Transplantation, Research, or Commercial Purposes: Protocol for a Bioethics Scoping Review.从婴儿和新生儿获取器官或组织用于移植、研究或商业目的的伦理问题:生物伦理学范围审查方案
Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Dec 5;9:717. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23235.1. eCollection 2024.
8
What is the existing evidence base for adult medical same day emergency care in UK NHS hospitals? A scoping review protocol.英国国民医疗服务体系(NHS)医院中成人当日紧急医疗护理的现有证据基础是什么?一项范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 4;13(10):e071890. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-071890.
9
Factors that influence clinical trial participation by patients with cancer in Australia: a scoping review protocol.影响澳大利亚癌症患者参与临床试验的因素:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 6;12(4):e057675. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057675.
10
Athletes' access to, attitudes towards and experiences of help-seeking for mental health: a scoping review protocol.运动员获取心理健康帮助的途径、态度和体验:系统综述研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 6;13(4):e062279. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062279.

引用本文的文献

1
Interventions to Support Transitions in Care Among Patients With Cancer: A Scoping Review.支持癌症患者护理过渡的干预措施:一项范围综述
Cancer Med. 2025 Mar;14(5):e70660. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70660.
2
Are there opportunities to improve care as patients transition through the cancer care continuum? A scoping review.在患者贯穿癌症护理连续过程中,是否存在改善护理的机会?一项范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 12;14(12):e078210. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078210.
3
Barriers to cancer treatment and care for people experiencing structural vulnerability: a secondary analysis of ethnographic data.结构性脆弱人群癌症治疗和护理的障碍:人种学数据分析的二次分析。
Int J Equity Health. 2023 Mar 30;22(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-01860-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Adverse Events After Transition From ICU to Hospital Ward: A Multicenter Cohort Study.从 ICU 转至普通病房后的不良事件:一项多中心队列研究。
Crit Care Med. 2020 Jul;48(7):946-953. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004327.
2
Survivorship Care Plans in Cancer: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of Care Plan Outcomes.癌症患者生存护理计划:护理计划结果的 Meta 分析和系统评价。
Oncologist. 2020 Feb;25(2):e351-e372. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0184. Epub 2019 Oct 25.
3
Global, Regional, and National Cancer Incidence, Mortality, Years of Life Lost, Years Lived With Disability, and Disability-Adjusted Life-Years for 29 Cancer Groups, 1990 to 2017: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study.全球、区域和国家癌症发病率、死亡率、生命损失年数、失能生存年数以及 29 种癌症组别的伤残调整生命年数:1990 至 2017 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Dec 1;5(12):1749-1768. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.2996.
4
Preparation and Implementation of Intrahospital Transfer Protocol for Emergency Department Patients to Decrease Unexpected Events.急诊科患者院内转运协议的制定与实施以减少意外事件
Adv J Emerg Med. 2018 Jan 22;2(3):e29. doi: 10.22114/AJEM.v0i0.50. eCollection 2018 Summer.
5
The global cancer burden: necessity is the mother of prevention.全球癌症负担:必要性是预防之母。
Nat Rev Cancer. 2019 Mar;19(3):123-124. doi: 10.1038/s41568-019-0110-3.
6
Methods for evaluating adverse drug event preventability in emergency department patients.评价急诊科患者药物不良事件可预防程度的方法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Dec 4;18(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0617-4.
7
A Partially Structured Postoperative Handoff Protocol Improves Communication in 2 Mixed Surgical Intensive Care Units: Findings From the Handoffs and Transitions in Critical Care (HATRICC) Prospective Cohort Study.部分结构化术后交接班协议可改善 2 个混合外科重症监护病房的沟通:来自重症监护交接班和过渡(HATRICC)前瞻性队列研究的结果。
Ann Surg. 2020 Mar;271(3):484-493. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003137.
8
Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.全球癌症统计数据 2018:GLOBOCAN 对全球 185 个国家/地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率的估计。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
9
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation.PRISMA 扩展用于范围审查 (PRISMA-ScR): 清单和解释。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
10
Secondary EMR data for quality improvement and research: A comparison of manual and electronic data collection from an integrated critical care electronic medical record system.用于质量改进和研究的次要电子病历数据:从集成的重症监护电子病历系统中手动和电子数据采集的比较。
J Crit Care. 2018 Oct;47:295-301. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.07.021. Epub 2018 Jul 22.