• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估助听器中的频移技术对言语辨别能力的影响。

Evaluation of the Effect of Frequency-Shifting Technique Used in Hearing Aids for Speech Discrimination.

机构信息

Department of Audiology, Academy Hearing Center, Bursa, Turkey.

Department of Audiology and Speech Pathology, İstinye University, Faculty of Health Sciences, İstanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Int Tinnitus J. 2021 Jan 25;24(2):86-91. doi: 10.5935/0946-5448.20200016.

DOI:10.5935/0946-5448.20200016
PMID:33496418
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the effect of frequency-shifting techniques recently used in hearing aids for speech discrimination scores and hearing thresholds.

METHODS

Thirty individuals (16 men and 14 women) with sensorineural hearing loss who used normal fitting monaural hearing aids and frequency-shifting feature for at least 2 months and whose 4000-8000 Hz hearing threshold was over 70 dB participated. The average age was 69.73 ± 10 (range: 65-80 years). We detected the types and degree of each participant's hearing loss. Measurements with and without hearing aids were made in a free field. For speech discrimination scores, 6 listings consisting of 25 monosyllables have been used. It has been avoided to learn words thanks to presentation of words in different listings to subjects.

RESULTS

Pure-tone averages of the participants were measured using a supra-aural headphone, normal fitting hearing aid, and frequency-shifting feature. The results were 55.93 ± 6.89, 40.47 ± 5.48, and 36.73 ± 5.72 dB, respectively (p˂0.05). Speech discrimination scores for hearing aids worn on the right ear were measured as 67.73 ± 12.42%, 77.33 ± 10.33%, and 82.13 ± 10.46% with supra-aural headphones, normal fitting hearing aids, and frequency-shifting feature, respectively. Scores for hearing aids worn on the left ear were 68 ± 7.56%, 76.80 ± 6.96%, and 82.13 ± 6.67% with supra-aural headphone, normal fitting hearing aid, and frequency-shifting feature, respectively (p˂0.05).

CONCLUSION

Elderly individuals using hearing aids had low speech discrimination scores. The frequency-shifting feature recently used in hearing aids significantly increased the scores, making a significant contribution to the solution of speech reception and communication problems in cases of high-frequency hearing loss caused by presbyacusis in elderly individuals..

摘要

背景

评估助听器中最近使用的频率转换技术对言语辨别得分和听力阈值的影响。

方法

30 名(16 名男性和 14 名女性)患有感音神经性听力损失的个体,他们使用正常适配的单耳助听器和频率转换功能至少 2 个月,并且 4000-8000 Hz 的听力阈值超过 70 dB。平均年龄为 69.73±10(范围:65-80 岁)。我们检测了每个参与者听力损失的类型和程度。在自由场中进行了有和没有助听器的测量。对于言语辨别得分,使用了由 25 个单音节组成的 6 个列表。通过向受试者展示不同列表中的单词来避免学习单词。

结果

使用耳罩式耳机、正常适配的助听器和频率转换功能测量参与者的纯音平均值。结果分别为 55.93±6.89、40.47±5.48 和 36.73±5.72 dB(p˂0.05)。右耳佩戴助听器时,使用耳罩式耳机、正常适配助听器和频率转换功能测得的言语辨别得分分别为 67.73±12.42%、77.33±10.33%和 82.13±10.46%。左耳佩戴助听器时,使用耳罩式耳机、正常适配助听器和频率转换功能测得的言语辨别得分分别为 68±7.56%、76.80±6.96%和 82.13±6.67%(p˂0.05)。

结论

使用助听器的老年人言语辨别得分较低。助听器中最近使用的频率转换功能显著提高了得分,为解决由于老年人听力损失引起的高频听力损失导致的言语接收和交流问题做出了重大贡献。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the Effect of Frequency-Shifting Technique Used in Hearing Aids for Speech Discrimination.评估助听器中的频移技术对言语辨别能力的影响。
Int Tinnitus J. 2021 Jan 25;24(2):86-91. doi: 10.5935/0946-5448.20200016.
2
Cortical auditory-evoked potentials (CAEPs) in adults in response to filtered speech stimuli.成人对滤波言语刺激的皮质听觉诱发电位(CAEPs)。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2013 Oct;24(9):807-22. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.24.9.5.
3
A comparison of threshold-based fitting strategies for nonlinear hearing aids.非线性助听器基于阈值的拟合策略比较
Ear Hear. 1998 Apr;19(2):131-8. doi: 10.1097/00003446-199804000-00005.
4
Presbyacusis, hearing aids and aging.老年性聋、助听器与衰老
Audiology. 1977 Mar-Apr;16(2):146-63.
5
Effects of sensorineural hearing loss and personal hearing AIDS on cortical event-related potential and behavioral measures of speech-sound processing.感音神经性听力损失及个人使用助听器对皮质事件相关电位和言语声音处理行为指标的影响。
Ear Hear. 2005 Apr;26(2):165-85. doi: 10.1097/00003446-200504000-00005.
6
Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.刺激水平对使用人工耳蜗或数字助听器的儿童言语感知能力的影响。
Ear Hear. 2006 Oct;27(5):493-507. doi: 10.1097/01.aud.0000234635.48564.ce.
7
The time course and magnitude of perceptual acclimatization to frequency responses: evidence from monaural fitting of hearing aids.对频率响应的感知适应的时间进程和程度:来自助听器单耳适配的证据。
J Acoust Soc Am. 1992 Sep;92(3):1258-68. doi: 10.1121/1.403921.
8
Benefits of amplification for unaided speech discrimination in age-related hearing loss with flat type audiogram.在平坦型听力图的年龄相关性听力损失中,放大对无助听言语辨别能力的益处。
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2023 Feb;50(1):62-69. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2022.05.006. Epub 2022 May 25.
9
Relationships among speech perception, production, language, hearing loss, and age in children with impaired hearing.听力受损儿童的言语感知、言语产生、语言、听力损失和年龄之间的关系。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2001 Apr;44(2):264-85. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2001/022).
10
Verification of in situ thresholds and integrated real-ear measurements.原位阈值验证和综合真耳测量
J Am Acad Audiol. 2010 Nov-Dec;21(10):663-70. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.21.10.6.