Rusch V W, Capps J S, Tyler M L, Pierson D L
Department of Surgery, University Hospital, Seattle 98195.
Chest. 1988 Apr;93(4):859-63. doi: 10.1378/chest.93.4.859.
In order to compare the performance of four pleural drainage units (PDU [Emerson Post-Operative Pump, Pleur-Evac, Sentinel Seal, Thora-Klex]), we created an animal model of bronchopleural fistula that simulated the type of air leak seen clinically (mean maximal flow = 5 L/min). The PDU were tested at 0 cm (water seal), -20 cm and -40 cmH2O suction. Compared to water seal, -20 cmH2O suction significantly increased the ability of all four PDU to evacuate air via the chest tube and abolished small differences in chest tube air leak seen among the PDU at water seal. An increase in suction to -40 cmH2O did not significantly alter flow via the chest tube. Previously demonstrated differences among the PDU in handling large air flows were not seen in this lower flow model of bronchopleural fistula. However, because of their higher resistance, use of the Sentinel Seal and of the Thora-Klex was technically impractical even at air leaks of 4 to 5 L/min.
为了比较四种胸腔引流装置(PDU [艾默生术后泵、胸腔引流器、哨兵密封、索拉 - 克莱克斯])的性能,我们创建了一个支气管胸膜瘘动物模型,该模型模拟了临床上所见的气胸类型(平均最大流量 = 5升/分钟)。在0厘米(水封)、-20厘米和-40厘米水柱负压下对PDU进行测试。与水封相比,-20厘米水柱负压显著提高了所有四种PDU通过胸管排出空气的能力,并消除了在水封状态下PDU之间胸管气胸漏气的微小差异。将负压增加到-40厘米水柱并没有显著改变通过胸管的流量。在这个较低流量的支气管胸膜瘘模型中,未观察到先前证明的PDU在处理大量气流方面的差异。然而,由于其较高的阻力,即使在4至5升/分钟的气胸漏气情况下,使用哨兵密封和索拉 - 克莱克斯在技术上也不实用。