Chrystyn H
Chest Unit, Pontefract General Infirmary, West Yorks.
Drug Intell Clin Pharm. 1988 Jan;22(1):49-53. doi: 10.1177/106002808802200112.
A computer program based on the statistical technique of Bayesian analysis has been adapted to run on several microcomputers. The clinical application of this method for gentamicin has been validated in 13 patients with varying degrees of renal function by a comparison of the accuracy of this method to a predictive algorithm method and one using standard pharmacokinetic principles. Blood samples for serum gentamicin analysis were taken after the administration of an intravenous loading dose of gentamicin. The results produced by each method were used to predict the peak and trough values measured on day 3 of therapy. Of the three methods studied, Bayesian analysis, using a serum gentamicin concentration drawn four hours after the initial dose, was the least biased and the most precise method for predicting the observed levels. The mean prediction error of the Bayesian analysis method, using the four-hour sample, was -0.03 mg/L for the peak serum concentration and -0.07 mg/L for the trough level on day 3. Using this method the corresponding root mean squared prediction error was 0.60 mg/L and 0.36 mg/L for the peak and trough levels, respectively.
一种基于贝叶斯分析统计技术的计算机程序已被改编用于在多台微型计算机上运行。通过将该方法的准确性与预测算法方法以及使用标准药代动力学原理的方法进行比较,这种庆大霉素方法在13例肾功能程度各异的患者中得到了临床验证。在静脉注射负荷剂量的庆大霉素后采集用于血清庆大霉素分析的血样。每种方法产生的结果用于预测治疗第3天测得的峰浓度和谷浓度值。在所研究的三种方法中,使用初始剂量后4小时采集的血清庆大霉素浓度的贝叶斯分析,是预测观察水平时偏差最小且最精确的方法。使用4小时样本的贝叶斯分析方法,第3天血清峰浓度的平均预测误差为-0.03mg/L,谷浓度为-0.07mg/L。使用该方法,峰浓度和谷浓度的相应均方根预测误差分别为0.60mg/L和0.36mg/L。