• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医生对在处方和药品标签上加入用药原因信息的看法:一项定性主题分析。

Prescribers' perspectives on including reason for use information on prescriptions and medication labels: a qualitative thematic analysis.

机构信息

University of Waterloo School of Pharmacy, Health Sciences Campus, 200 University Ave West, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada.

Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4L8, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jan 26;21(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06103-1.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-021-06103-1
PMID:33499869
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7836591/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The indication for prescribing a particular medication, or its reason for use (RFU) is a crucial piece of information for all those involved in the circle of care. Research has shown that sharing RFU information with physicians, pharmacists and patients improves patient safety and patient adherence, however RFU is rarely added on prescriptions by prescribers or on medication labels for patients to reference.

METHODS

Qualitative interviews were conducted with 20 prescribers in Southern Ontario, Canada, to learn prescribers' current attitudes on the addition of RFU on prescriptions and medication labels. A trained interviewer used a semi-structured interview guide for each interview. The interviews explored how the sharing of RFU information would impact prescribers' workflows and practices. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and thematically coded.

RESULTS

The analysis yielded four main themes: Current Practice, Future Practice, Changing Culture, and Collaboration. Most of the prescribers interviewed do not currently add RFU to prescriptions. Prescribers were open to sharing RFU with colleagues via a regional database but wanted the ability to provide context for the prescribed medication within the system. Many prescribers were wary of the impact of adding RFU on their workflow but felt it could save time by avoiding clarifying questions from pharmacists. Increased interprofessional collaboration, increased patient understanding of prescribed medications, avoiding guesswork when determining indications and decreased misinterpretation regarding RFU were cited by most prescribers as benefits to including RFU information.

CONCLUSIONS

Prescribers were generally open to sharing RFU and clearly identified the benefits to pharmacists and patients if added. Critically, they also identified benefits to their own practices. These results can be used to guide the implementation of future initiatives to promote the sharing of RFU in healthcare teams.

摘要

背景

开具特定药物的指示(适应证)或其使用原因(RFU)是所有参与治疗圈的人员的关键信息。研究表明,与医生、药剂师和患者共享 RFU 信息可提高患者安全性和患者依从性,但开处方者很少在处方上添加 RFU 信息,也很少在药物标签上添加供患者参考的 RFU 信息。

方法

在加拿大安大略省南部对 20 名开处方者进行了定性访谈,以了解开处方者对在处方和药物标签上添加 RFU 的当前态度。一名经过培训的访谈者使用半结构化访谈指南进行了每次访谈。访谈内容探讨了共享 RFU 信息将如何影响开处方者的工作流程和实践。访谈进行了录音、转录和主题编码。

结果

分析产生了四个主要主题:当前实践、未来实践、改变文化和协作。大多数接受采访的开处方者目前不在处方上添加 RFU。开处方者对通过区域数据库与同事共享 RFU 持开放态度,但希望在系统内为所开药物提供上下文。许多开处方者对添加 RFU 对其工作流程的影响感到担忧,但认为这可以通过避免向药剂师澄清问题来节省时间。增加专业间合作、增加患者对所开药物的理解、避免在确定适应证时猜测以及减少对 RFU 的误解是大多数开处方者认为包括 RFU 信息的好处。

结论

开处方者普遍愿意共享 RFU,如果添加,他们明确指出了对药剂师和患者的好处。至关重要的是,他们还确定了对自己实践的好处。这些结果可用于指导未来举措的实施,以促进在医疗保健团队中共享 RFU。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fbc/7836591/de2a5536c408/12913_2021_6103_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fbc/7836591/de2a5536c408/12913_2021_6103_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fbc/7836591/de2a5536c408/12913_2021_6103_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Prescribers' perspectives on including reason for use information on prescriptions and medication labels: a qualitative thematic analysis.医生对在处方和药品标签上加入用药原因信息的看法:一项定性主题分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jan 26;21(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06103-1.
2
How do I keep myself safe? Patient perspectives on including reason for use information on prescriptions and medication labels: a qualitative thematic analysis.我如何保护自己的安全?患者对在处方和药品标签上包含用药原因信息的看法:一项定性主题分析。
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2020 Oct 7;13:63. doi: 10.1186/s40545-020-00268-6. eCollection 2020.
3
Pharmacists' perspectives on the value of reason for use information.药剂师对用药理由信息价值的看法。
Can Pharm J (Ott). 2020 Aug 18;153(5):294-300. doi: 10.1177/1715163520946052. eCollection 2020 Sep-Oct.
4
What do Australian consumers, pharmacists and prescribers think about documenting indications on prescriptions and dispensed medicines labels?: A qualitative study.澳大利亚消费者、药剂师和开处方者对在处方和配药标签上记录适应症有何看法?一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Nov 15;17(1):734. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2704-3.
5
Reason for Use: An Opportunity to Improve Patient Safety.使用原因:提升患者安全的契机。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019;257:47-52.
6
Factors influencing secondary care pharmacist and nurse independent prescribers' clinical reasoning: An interprofessional analysis.影响二级医疗保健药剂师和护士独立处方者临床推理的因素:一项跨专业分析。
J Interprof Care. 2018 Mar;32(2):160-168. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2017.1394279. Epub 2017 Nov 30.
7
Pharmacy students teaching prescribers strategies to lower prescription drug costs for underserved patients.药学专业学生向开处方者传授为服务不足的患者降低处方药成本的策略。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2013 Sep;19(7):534-41. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2013.19.7.534.
8
Prescribers' knowledge of and sources of information for potential drug-drug interactions: a postal survey of US prescribers.处方医生对潜在药物相互作用的了解及信息来源:对美国处方医生的邮寄调查。
Drug Saf. 2008;31(6):525-36. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200831060-00007.
9
Nurse prescribers' experiences of prescribing.护士处方者的处方经历。
J Clin Nurs. 2004 Oct;13(7):796-805. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2004.00993.x.
10
Analysis of Prescribers' Notes in Electronic Prescriptions in Ambulatory Practice.分析门诊电子处方中的医嘱。
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Apr;176(4):463-70. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.7786.

引用本文的文献

1
Indication documentation and indication-based prescribing within electronic prescribing systems: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.电子处方系统中的适应证文档和基于适应证的处方:系统评价和叙述性综合。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2023 Jun;32(6):357-368. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2022-015452. Epub 2023 Feb 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Pharmacists' perspectives on the value of reason for use information.药剂师对用药理由信息价值的看法。
Can Pharm J (Ott). 2020 Aug 18;153(5):294-300. doi: 10.1177/1715163520946052. eCollection 2020 Sep-Oct.
2
How do I keep myself safe? Patient perspectives on including reason for use information on prescriptions and medication labels: a qualitative thematic analysis.我如何保护自己的安全?患者对在处方和药品标签上包含用药原因信息的看法:一项定性主题分析。
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2020 Oct 7;13:63. doi: 10.1186/s40545-020-00268-6. eCollection 2020.
3
Medication Discrepancies in Discharge Summaries and Associated Risk Factors for Elderly Patients with Many Drugs.
老年多病患者出院小结中的用药差异及相关危险因素
Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2020 Mar;7(1):53-62. doi: 10.1007/s40801-019-00176-5.
4
Prescription Drug Use Among Adults Aged 40-79 in the United States and Canada.美国和加拿大40至79岁成年人的处方药使用情况。
NCHS Data Brief. 2019 Aug(347):1-8.
5
How often do prescribers include indications in drug orders? Analysis of 4 million outpatient prescriptions.医生在药物医嘱中注明适应证的频率是多少?对 400 万份门诊处方的分析。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2019 Jun 18;76(13):970-979. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxz082.
6
"My pharmacist": Creating and maintaining relationship between physicians and pharmacists in primary care settings.“我的药剂师”:在初级保健环境中建立和维护医生与药剂师之间的关系。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2020 Jan;16(1):102-107. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.03.144. Epub 2019 Apr 3.
7
Comparison of a Prototype for Indications-Based Prescribing With 2 Commercial Prescribing Systems.基于适应证的处方原型与 2 种商业处方系统的比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Mar 1;2(3):e191514. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.1514.
8
Reason for Use: An Opportunity to Improve Patient Safety.使用原因:提升患者安全的契机。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019;257:47-52.
9
A Prescription For Enhancing Electronic Prescribing Safety.增强电子处方安全的处方。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Nov;37(11):1877-1883. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.0725.
10
Medical students as agents of change: a qualitative exploratory study.医学生作为变革推动者:一项定性探索性研究。
BMJ Open Qual. 2018 Sep 4;7(3):e000420. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000420. eCollection 2018.