Le Guyader Alexandre, Pernot Mathieu, Delmas Clément, Roze Stéphane, Fau Isabelle, Flecher Erwan, Lebreton Guillaume
Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France.
Department of Cardiology and Cardio-Vascular Surgery, Haut-Lévèque University Hospital, Bordeaux, France.
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2021 Jan 19;13:53-63. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S278269. eCollection 2021.
Cardiogenic shock (CS), if not diagnosed and treated rapidly, can lead to irreversible multiorgan damage and death. An economic analysis was conducted to determine the budget impact of the introduction of Impella 5.0, a mechanical circulatory support (MCS) device that directly unloads the left ventricle, into clinical practice in patients with left ventricular CS in France.
A budget impact model was developed to compare the cost of Impella 5.0 with veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) from the perspective of the French national healthcare insurer. Costs associated with Impella 5.0, plus complication-related costs for VA-ECMO or Impella 5.0 from 2019 were included and clinical input data relating to complication rates and time spent on device were sourced from published literature. Extensive scenario and one-way deterministic sensitivity analyses were performed to explore the influence of uncertainty around key input parameters.
Over a time horizon of 5 years, the introduction of Impella 5.0 was associated with cumulative savings of EUR 4.3 million. The results were driven by the lower risk of device-related complications associated with Impella 5.0. Savings were apparent from Year 1 onwards, with savings in excess of EUR 375,000 projected in Year 1 alone. On a per-patient level, in Year 1, estimated savings with the introduction of Impella 5.0 totaled EUR 616 per patient. Sensitivity analyses showed that the findings of the analysis were robust.
The Impella 5.0 device was associated with cumulative cost savings in excess of EUR 4 million over a 5-year period compared with current practice. Projected savings were driven by a lower rate of device-related complications with Impella 5.0 compared with VA-ECMO.
心源性休克(CS)若不迅速诊断和治疗,可导致不可逆的多器官损伤及死亡。本研究进行了一项经济分析,以确定在法国将Impella 5.0(一种直接减轻左心室负荷的机械循环支持(MCS)装置)引入左心室CS患者临床实践中的预算影响。
建立了一个预算影响模型,从法国国家医疗保险公司的角度比较Impella 5.0与静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合(VA-ECMO)的成本。纳入了与Impella 5.0相关的成本,以及2019年以来VA-ECMO或Impella 5.0的并发症相关成本,与并发症发生率和设备使用时间相关的临床输入数据来自已发表的文献。进行了广泛的情景分析和单向确定性敏感性分析,以探讨关键输入参数周围不确定性的影响。
在5年的时间范围内,引入Impella 5.0可累计节省430万欧元。结果归因于与Impella 5.0相关的与设备相关并发症的风险较低。从第1年起就有明显的节省,仅第1年预计节省就超过37.5万欧元。在每位患者层面,第1年,引入Impella 5.0估计每位患者可节省616欧元。敏感性分析表明,该分析结果具有稳健性。
与当前实践相比,Impella 5.0装置在5年期间累计节省成本超过400万欧元。预计节省是由于与VA-ECMO相比,Impella 5.0与设备相关并发症的发生率较低。