Lance-Jones C
Department of Neurobiology, Anatomy and Cell Science, University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine, Pennsylvania 15261.
Dev Biol. 1988 Apr;126(2):408-19. doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(88)90150-9.
Although the formation of motoneuron projections to individual muscles in the embryonic chick hindlimb has been shown to involve the specific recognition of environmental cues, the source of these cues and their mode of acquisition are not known. I show in the accompanying paper (C. Lance-Jones, 1988, Dev. Biol. 126, 394-407) that there is a correlation between the segmental level of origin of motoneurons and the somitic level of origin of the muscle cells of their targets in the chick hindlimb. These data are compatible with the hypothesis that the developmental basis for specific recognition is a positional one. Motoneurons and myogenic cells may be uniquely labeled in accord with their axial level of origin early in development and subsequently matched on the basis of these labels. To test this hypothesis, I have assessed motoneuron projection patterns in the embryonic chick hindlimb after somitic tissue manipulations. In one series of embryos, somitic mesoderm at levels 26-29 or 27-29 was reversed about the anteroposterior axis prior to myogenic cell migration and axon outgrowth. Since previous studies have shown that cells migrate from the somites in accord with their position and that somites 26-29 populate anterior thigh musculature, this operation will have reversed the somitic level of origin of anterior thigh muscles. Retrograde HRP labeling of projections to anterior thigh muscles at stage (st) 30 and st 35-38 showed that motoneuron projections were largely normal. This finding suggests that limb muscle cells or their source, the somites, do not contain the cues responsible for specific recognition prior to myogenic cell migration and axon outgrowth. To confirm that specific guidance cues were still intact after somitic mesoderm reversal, I also assessed motoneuron projections in embryos where somitic tissue plus adjacent spinal cord segments at levels 26-29 were reversed in a similar manner. Analyses of the distribution of retrogradely labeled motoneurons in reversed cord segments at st 35-36 indicated that motoneuron projections were reversed. This finding suggests that motoneurons have altered their course to project to correct targets despite the altered somitic origin of their targets and, thus, that specific guidance cues were intact. I conclude that if cues governing target or pathway choice are encoded positionally then they must be associated with other embryonic tissues such as the connective tissues or that guidance cues are acquired by myogenic cells after the onset of migration and motoneuron specification.
虽然已经证明胚胎期鸡后肢中运动神经元向各个肌肉的投射形成涉及对环境线索的特异性识别,但这些线索的来源及其获取方式尚不清楚。我在随附论文(C. 兰斯 - 琼斯,1988年,《发育生物学》126卷,394 - 407页)中表明,鸡后肢中运动神经元的起源节段水平与其靶标肌肉细胞的体节起源水平之间存在相关性。这些数据与特异性识别的发育基础是位置性这一假设相符。运动神经元和生肌细胞可能在发育早期就根据其轴向起源水平被独特地标记,随后基于这些标记进行匹配。为了验证这一假设,我在对体节组织进行操作后评估了胚胎期鸡后肢中的运动神经元投射模式。在一系列胚胎中,在生肌细胞迁移和轴突长出之前,将26 - 29或27 - 29水平的体节中胚层绕前后轴反转。由于先前的研究表明细胞根据其位置从体节迁移,且26 - 29体节形成大腿前部肌肉组织,此操作将反转大腿前部肌肉的体节起源水平。在第30期以及第35 - 38期对投射至大腿前部肌肉的逆行HRP标记显示,运动神经元投射基本正常。这一发现表明,在生肌细胞迁移和轴突长出之前,肢体肌肉细胞或其来源体节不包含负责特异性识别的线索。为了确认在体节中胚层反转后特异性引导线索仍然完整,我还评估了以类似方式反转26 - 29水平的体节组织加相邻脊髓节段的胚胎中的运动神经元投射。对第35 - 36期反转脊髓节段中逆行标记的运动神经元分布的分析表明,运动神经元投射发生了反转。这一发现表明,尽管其靶标的体节起源发生了改变,但运动神经元改变了其投射路径以投射至正确的靶标,因此,特异性引导线索是完整的。我得出结论,如果控制靶标或路径选择的线索是按位置编码的,那么它们必定与其他胚胎组织如结缔组织相关联,或者引导线索是在迁移和运动神经元特化开始后由生肌细胞获取的。