慢性颈腰痛患者应用加巴喷丁类药物和阿片类药物与阿片类药物单药治疗缓解疼痛的回顾性分析。
A Retrospective Analysis of Gabapentinoid and Opioids to Opioid Monotherapy for Pain Relief in Patients with Chronic Neck and Low Back Pain.
机构信息
Department of Anesthesiology, Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
Department of Anesthesiology, University of Illinois, Chicago, Illinois.
出版信息
Pain Med. 2021 Aug 6;22(8):1760-1766. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnab006.
OBJECTIVE
We compared the reduction in pain and opioid consumption in patients with chronic spinal pain on concomitant gabapentinoids and opioids with patients using opioids only.
DESIGN
This was a retrospective chart review of patients with chronic neck or low back pain who were on opioids with at least a 24-month follow-up.
SETTING
Single-center pain clinic in an urban setting.
SUBJECTS
167 patients with chronic spinal pain lasting at least six months.
METHODS
Patients on gabapentin or pregabalin were included in the gabapentinoid group, while the other patients were included in the non-gabapentinoid group. Primary outcome was assessment of pain scores measured via a numeric rating scale (NRS), and secondary outcomes were response to the treatment (>2 point reduction on NRS) and daily opioid use measured in morphine milliequivalents.
RESULTS
Pain scores were reduced in the first six months and plateaued after that in both groups. At the end of 24 months, the average pain score was 6.71 in the gabapentinoid group, while the average pain score was 7.18 in the non-gabapentinoid group. There was no statistical significance between the groups (p = 0.28). There was no difference in response to treatment in gabapentinoid group (33.3%) when compared with non-gabapentinoid group (32.7%). We also failed to find any significant difference in daily opioid usage between the two groups.
CONCLUSION
Gabapentinoids may not lead to reduction in pain or opioid consumption in patients with chronic spinal pain. A careful approach must be adopted while prescribing gabapentinoids in the chronic spinal pain patient population.
目的
我们比较了同时使用加巴喷丁类药物和阿片类药物与仅使用阿片类药物治疗慢性脊柱疼痛患者的疼痛减轻和阿片类药物消耗情况。
设计
这是一项对在城市环境中单中心疼痛诊所接受至少 24 个月随访的慢性颈痛或腰痛患者进行的回顾性图表审查。
设置
城市环境中的单中心疼痛诊所。
对象
167 例慢性脊柱疼痛持续至少 6 个月的患者。
方法
服用加巴喷丁或普瑞巴林的患者被纳入加巴喷丁类药物组,而其他患者被纳入非加巴喷丁类药物组。主要结局是通过数字评分量表(NRS)评估疼痛评分,次要结局是对治疗的反应(NRS 评分降低>2 分)和以吗啡毫当量测量的每日阿片类药物使用量。
结果
两组患者在最初 6 个月内疼痛评分降低,之后趋于稳定。在 24 个月结束时,加巴喷丁类药物组的平均疼痛评分为 6.71,而非加巴喷丁类药物组的平均疼痛评分为 7.18。两组之间无统计学意义(p=0.28)。与非加巴喷丁类药物组(32.7%)相比,加巴喷丁类药物组(33.3%)的治疗反应无差异。我们也未能发现两组之间每日阿片类药物使用量存在显著差异。
结论
加巴喷丁类药物可能不会降低慢性脊柱疼痛患者的疼痛或阿片类药物消耗。在慢性脊柱疼痛患者人群中开具加巴喷丁类药物时,必须采取谨慎的方法。