Suppr超能文献

舒迪采标准 2020:当前文献回顾和国际共识会议结果。

Shouldice standard 2020: review of the current literature and results of an international consensus meeting.

机构信息

3+CHIRURGEN Hernia Center, Klosterstrasse 34/35, 13581, Berlin, Germany.

Department for General- Visceral and Minimal-Invasive Surgery, Park-Klinik Weissensee, Schönstraße 80, 13086, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Hernia. 2021 Oct;25(5):1199-1207. doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02365-6. Epub 2021 Jan 27.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

For many years the Shouldice technique was the gold standard for inguinal hernia repair. Nowadays mesh repair has been proven to entail better results in randomized trials. Since the first publication 1953 the Repair has been described in detail in many textbooks, articles and You Tube videos. It appears that the original technique is used almost exclusively in the Shouldice Hospital in Thornhill/ Canada and despite the success of the Shouldice Hospital many surgeons inexplicably modify this original technique in their daily practice. In the last couple of years there appears to be an increasing interest in pure tissue repairs for various reasons, often fear of mesh-related pain. The aim of the study was to review the current evidence and to define an updated standard with key principles of the Shouldice repair.

METHODS

Because of unpublished evidence regarding many operative details the organizing group decided to create a technical update via a consensus meeting with 13 international designated hernia surgeons from six countries. In preparation of the meeting a review of the current literature regarding Shouldice repair was done by the organizing group. A questionnaire was prepared and sent to all participants before the meeting to get an independent answer on all critical aspects.

RESULTS

All questions regarding a detailed standard of the operation technique could be outlined. As result of the consensus meeting the participants have formulated all key-points of preparation/dissection and repair of the Shouldice technique. For 5 of 6 critical technical surgical steps a strong consensus could be defined in the group. There was no consensus among the group regarding the cremaster resection and the ideal indication for Shouldice repair.

CONCLUSION

After a 75-year history of the Shouldice repair the technique should continue to merit consideration by all hernia surgeons. After this consensus meeting a clear binding standard of the Shouldice technique for all interested surgeons is proposed.

摘要

简介

多年来,Shoulice 技术一直是腹股沟疝修补的金标准。如今,网状修复已被证明在随机试验中能带来更好的结果。自 1953 年首次发表以来,该修复技术已在许多教科书、文章和 YouTube 视频中详细描述。似乎原始技术几乎仅在加拿大桑希尔/ thornhill 的 Shoulice 医院使用,尽管 Shoulice 医院取得了成功,但许多外科医生在日常实践中莫名其妙地修改了这种原始技术。在过去的几年中,由于各种原因,人们对纯组织修复越来越感兴趣,通常是担心与网片相关的疼痛。本研究旨在回顾现有证据,并确定一个更新的标准,其中包含 Shoulice 修复的关键原则。

方法

由于许多手术细节的未公开证据,组织小组决定通过一次由来自六个国家的 13 名国际指定疝外科医生参加的共识会议来创建技术更新。在会议筹备期间,组织小组对当前关于 Shoulice 修复的文献进行了回顾。准备了一份问卷,并在会议前分发给所有与会者,以获得对所有关键方面的独立答案。

结果

所有关于手术技术详细标准的问题都可以概述。作为共识会议的结果,与会者制定了 Shoulice 技术的准备/解剖和修复的所有要点。对于 6 个关键技术手术步骤中的 5 个步骤,小组内达成了强烈共识。在切除提睾肌和 Shoulice 修复的理想适应症方面,小组内没有达成共识。

结论

在 Shoulice 修复技术有 75 年的历史之后,所有疝外科医生都应该继续考虑该技术。在这次共识会议之后,为所有感兴趣的外科医生提出了一个明确的、具有约束力的 Shoulice 技术标准。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验