Suppr超能文献

腹股沟疝手术中各种开放式腹膜前技术的比较与标准化——一项综述与共识的结果

Comparison and Standardisation of Various Open Preperitoneal Techniques in Inguinal Hernia Surgery-Results of a Review and Consensus.

作者信息

Lorenz Ralph, Akkersdijk Willem, De Oliveira Gabriel Paiva, Soler Marc, Gillion Jean-Francois, Lourenço Augusto, Da Costa Rui Soares, Pelissier Edouard, Ugahary Franz, Berrevoet Frederik

机构信息

Hernia Center 3+CHIRURGEN, Berlin, Germany.

Department of General and Abdominal Surgery, Clinic for General and Abdominal Surgery, Medical University Brandenburg an der Havel, Neuruppin, Germany.

出版信息

J Abdom Wall Surg. 2025 Mar 19;4:13990. doi: 10.3389/jaws.2025.13990. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Both open and laparoendoscopic preperitoneal mesh techniques are good options for the treatment of inguinal hernias. The 2023 updated HerniaSurge Guidelines recommend open preperitoneal mesh techniques as an acceptable alternative to Lichtenstein repair if a competent and experienced surgeon is available. However, although numerous open preperitoneal surgical techniques have been developed, only a few comparative studies comparing them are available. Because of the lack of scientific evidence and standardisation, the aim of this article is to define comparable standards and compare four frequently used open preperitoneal techniques.

METHOD

Using a Delphi-consensus process among both the authors and experts in the field, various key steps for each procedure, indications, and outcome parameters were set to allow adequate comparison of different open preperitoneal techniques.

RESULTS

We present four different and frequently used open preperitoneal techniques: Minimal Open PrePeritoneal repair (MOPP), TransInguinal PrePeritoneal repair (TIPP), TransREctus sheat PrePeritoneal repair (TREPP), and Open New Simplifyed Total Extraperitoneal repair (ONSTEP). We provide a clear and comparable standard regarding the best indication, different procedural steps, the use of meshes and fixation, the learning curve involved, and possible complications and limitations. We also identify some similarities for the techniques but also specific differences on different topics.

CONCLUSION

Development, validation, and implementation of these standards for the various open preperitoneal techniques are necessary both for education and training as well as for future comparative studies.

摘要

引言

开放腹膜前修补术和腹腔镜腹膜前修补术都是治疗腹股沟疝的良好选择。《2023年疝修补术指南更新版》建议,如果有能力且经验丰富的外科医生,开放腹膜前修补术可作为利希滕斯坦修补术的可接受替代方案。然而,尽管已经开发了许多开放腹膜前手术技术,但比较这些技术的对照研究却很少。由于缺乏科学证据和标准化,本文旨在定义可比标准并比较四种常用的开放腹膜前技术。

方法

通过作者与该领域专家之间的德尔菲共识过程,为每种手术的各个关键步骤、适应症和结果参数设定标准,以便对不同的开放腹膜前技术进行充分比较。

结果

我们介绍了四种不同且常用的开放腹膜前技术:微创腹膜前修补术(MOPP)、经腹股沟腹膜前修补术(TIPP)、经腹直肌鞘腹膜前修补术(TREPP)和开放式新型简化完全腹膜外修补术(ONSTEP)。我们针对最佳适应症、不同手术步骤、补片的使用和固定、所涉及的学习曲线以及可能的并发症和局限性提供了清晰且可比的标准。我们还确定了这些技术的一些相似之处以及在不同主题上的具体差异。

结论

制定、验证和实施这些针对各种开放腹膜前技术的标准,对于教育和培训以及未来的对照研究都是必要的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验