• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新型口服烟草制品相对于可燃香烟和尼古丁胶对成年吸烟者的滥用潜力的特征描述。

Characterization of the Abuse Potential in Adult Smokers of a Novel Oral Tobacco Product Relative to Combustible Cigarettes and Nicotine Polacrilex Gum.

机构信息

Altria Client Services LLC, Richmond, Virginia, USA.

Celerion Inc., Lincoln, Nebraska, USA.

出版信息

Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2021 Mar;10(3):241-250. doi: 10.1002/cpdd.909. Epub 2021 Jan 27.

DOI:10.1002/cpdd.909
PMID:33502815
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7986766/
Abstract

Novel noncombustible tobacco products offer adult smokers (ASs) alternatives to combustible cigarettes lower on the continuum of risk; however, the abuse potential of such products has not been well studied. The objective of this study was to evaluate the abuse potential of 2 chewable tobacco-derived nicotine containing products, VERVE Chews Blue Mint (test 1) and Green Mint (test 2), in ASs compared with own-brand cigarettes (CIGS) and nicotine polacrilex gum (GUM) using subjective measures and nicotine pharmacokinetics. ASs used the test products during a 5-day at-home trial prior to completing an in-clinic 4-period randomized crossover study. During the study ASs used test products, CIGS, and GUM once on separate days. Responses to Tobacco/Nicotine Withdrawal and Direct Effects of Product questionnaires were documented, and blood samples were collected to assess nicotine pharmacokinetics during each product use. Nicotine pharmacokinetic parameters (C and AUC) were statistically significantly lower with use of test products compared with CIGS and statistically significantly higher compared with GUM. No appreciable differences were noted between the 2 flavors for any of the end points measured. Reductions in maximum urge to smoke and maximum responses to the question "Is the Product 'Pleasant' Right Now?" for the test products were statistically significantly lower than CIGS but comparable to GUM. Similar results were observed for responses to other items in the 2 questionnaires. The test products, under the conditions of this study, carry lower abuse potential than own-brand cigarettes and similar to nicotine polacrilex gum.

摘要

新型不可燃烟草产品为成年吸烟者(ASs)提供了比可燃香烟风险更低的替代品;然而,这些产品的滥用潜力尚未得到充分研究。本研究的目的是评估 2 种咀嚼烟草衍生含尼古丁产品,VERVE Chews 蓝色薄荷(测试 1)和绿色薄荷(测试 2)在 ASs 中的滥用潜力,与自有品牌香烟(CIGS)和尼古丁聚醋酸酯口香糖(GUM)进行比较,使用主观测量和尼古丁药代动力学。ASs 在进行 4 期随机交叉诊所研究之前,在家中进行了为期 5 天的试用,在此期间使用了测试产品。在研究期间,ASs 每天分别使用测试产品、CIGS 和 GUM。记录了烟草/尼古丁戒断和产品直接效应问卷的回答,并采集了血样,以评估每次使用产品时的尼古丁药代动力学。与 CIGS 相比,使用测试产品时尼古丁药代动力学参数(C 和 AUC)统计学上显著降低,与 GUM 相比统计学上显著升高。在测量的任何终点中,2 种口味之间均未观察到明显差异。与 CIGS 相比,测试产品的最大吸烟冲动和“产品现在是否令人愉悦?”问题的最大反应显著降低,但与 GUM 相当。在这 2 个问卷中的其他项目的反应中也观察到了类似的结果。在本研究条件下,测试产品的滥用潜力低于自有品牌香烟,与尼古丁聚醋酸酯口香糖相当。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cf1/7986766/c98f2ac1a3fa/CPDD-10-241-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cf1/7986766/bfa238bfa182/CPDD-10-241-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cf1/7986766/c98f2ac1a3fa/CPDD-10-241-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cf1/7986766/bfa238bfa182/CPDD-10-241-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cf1/7986766/c98f2ac1a3fa/CPDD-10-241-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Characterization of the Abuse Potential in Adult Smokers of a Novel Oral Tobacco Product Relative to Combustible Cigarettes and Nicotine Polacrilex Gum.新型口服烟草制品相对于可燃香烟和尼古丁胶对成年吸烟者的滥用潜力的特征描述。
Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2021 Mar;10(3):241-250. doi: 10.1002/cpdd.909. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
2
Abuse liability assessment of the JUUL system in four flavors relative to combustible cigarette, nicotine gum and a comparator electronic nicotine delivery system among adult smokers.四种口味 JUUL 系统相对于可燃香烟、尼古丁口香糖和一种比较电子尼古丁输送系统在成年吸烟者中的滥用倾向评估。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020 Dec 1;217:108395. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108395. Epub 2020 Nov 4.
3
Assessment of the abuse liability of three menthol Vuse Solo electronic cigarettes relative to combustible cigarettes and nicotine gum.评估三种薄荷味 Vuse Solo 电子烟相对于可燃香烟和尼古丁口香糖的滥用倾向。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2018 Jul;235(7):2077-2086. doi: 10.1007/s00213-018-4904-x. Epub 2018 May 3.
4
Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic assessment of electronic cigarettes, combustible cigarettes, and nicotine gum: implications for abuse liability.电子烟、可燃香烟和尼古丁口香糖的药效学和药代动力学评估:对滥用倾向的影响。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2017 Sep;234(17):2643-2655. doi: 10.1007/s00213-017-4665-y. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
5
Abuse liability of two electronic nicotine delivery systems compared with combustible cigarettes and nicotine gum from an open-label randomized crossover study.一项开放标签随机交叉研究比较两种电子尼古丁输送系统与可燃香烟和尼古丁口香糖的滥用倾向。
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 2;13(1):18951. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-45894-7.
6
An abuse liability assessment of the glo tobacco heating product in comparison to combustible cigarettes and nicotine replacement therapy.加热不燃烧烟草制品与可燃香烟和尼古丁替代疗法的滥用倾向评估比较。
Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 29;12(1):14701. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19167-8.
7
Abuse liability assessment of the JUUL system in two nicotine concentrations compared to combustible cigarette, nicotine gum and comparator electronic nicotine delivery system.两种浓度 JUUL 系统与可燃香烟、尼古丁咀嚼胶和对照电子烟相比的滥用倾向评估。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020 Dec 1;217:108441. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108441. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
8
Nicotine pharmacokinetics and subjective response among adult smokers using different flavors of on!® nicotine pouches compared to combustible cigarettes.比较成年吸烟者使用不同口味的 on!® 尼古丁袋与可燃香烟的尼古丁药代动力学和主观反应。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2021 Nov;238(11):3325-3334. doi: 10.1007/s00213-021-05948-y. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
9
Nicotine delivery, tolerability and reduction of smoking urge in smokers following short-term use of one brand of electronic cigarettes.短期使用某一品牌电子烟后吸烟者的尼古丁递送、耐受性及吸烟欲望降低情况
BMC Public Health. 2015 Sep 30;15:991. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2349-2.
10
Nicotine pharmacokinetics and subjective responses after using nicotine pouches with different nicotine levels compared to combustible cigarettes and moist smokeless tobacco in adult tobacco users.成人烟民使用不同尼古丁含量的尼古丁袋与可燃香烟和湿无烟烟草后尼古丁药代动力学和主观反应的比较。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2022 Sep;239(9):2863-2873. doi: 10.1007/s00213-022-06172-y. Epub 2022 Jul 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Randomized crossover clinical studies to assess abuse liability and nicotine pharmacokinetics of Velo Oral Nicotine pouches.评估Velo口腔尼古丁袋滥用可能性和尼古丁药代动力学的随机交叉临床研究。
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Mar 13;16:1547073. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1547073. eCollection 2025.
2
Assessment of Abuse Liability and Nicotine Pharmacokinetics of glo Heated Tobacco Products in a Randomized, Crossover Study.加热不燃烧烟草制品滥用倾向评估及其尼古丁药代动力学的随机交叉研究。
Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2024 Nov;49(6):733-750. doi: 10.1007/s13318-024-00921-4. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
3
An abuse liability assessment of the glo tobacco heating product in comparison to combustible cigarettes and nicotine replacement therapy.

本文引用的文献

1
Reduction in Exposure to Selected Harmful and Potentially Harmful Constituents Approaching Those Observed Upon Smoking Abstinence in Smokers Switching to the Menthol Tobacco Heating System 2.2 for 3 Months (Part 1).减少选定的有害和潜在有害成分的暴露,接近吸烟者改用薄荷醇加热烟草系统 2.2 三个月(第 1 部分)后观察到的戒烟者的暴露水平。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 Apr 17;22(4):539-548. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntz013.
2
Current Cigarette Smoking Among Adults - United States, 2016.2016年美国成年人当前吸烟情况
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018 Jan 19;67(2):53-59. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6702a1.
3
E-Cigarettes and the Harm-Reduction Continuum.
加热不燃烧烟草制品与可燃香烟和尼古丁替代疗法的滥用倾向评估比较。
Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 29;12(1):14701. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19167-8.
4
A Randomized, Controlled Study to Assess Biomarkers of Exposure in Adult Smokers Switching to Oral Nicotine Products.一项评估成年吸烟者改用口服尼古丁产品后暴露生物标志物的随机对照研究。
J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Nov;62(11):1445-1458. doi: 10.1002/jcph.2098. Epub 2022 Aug 21.
5
Oral Nicotine Product Awareness and Use Among People Who Smoke and Vape in the U.S.美国烟民和电子烟使用者对尼古丁口服产品的认知和使用情况
Am J Prev Med. 2022 Oct;63(4):611-618. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2022.04.019. Epub 2022 Jun 4.
6
A randomised study to assess the nicotine pharmacokinetics of an oral nicotine pouch and two nicotine replacement therapy products.一项评估口服尼古丁袋和两种尼古丁替代疗法产品的尼古丁药代动力学的随机研究。
Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 28;12(1):6949. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-10544-x.
电子烟与危害降低连续体
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jan 18;378(3):216-219. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1711991.
4
Harm Minimization and Tobacco Control: Reframing Societal Views of Nicotine Use to Rapidly Save Lives.减少危害与烟草控制:重新构建社会对尼古丁使用的看法,以迅速拯救生命。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2018 Apr 1;39:193-213. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040617-013849. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
5
Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic assessment of electronic cigarettes, combustible cigarettes, and nicotine gum: implications for abuse liability.电子烟、可燃香烟和尼古丁口香糖的药效学和药代动力学评估:对滥用倾向的影响。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2017 Sep;234(17):2643-2655. doi: 10.1007/s00213-017-4665-y. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
6
A longitudinal study of smokeless tobacco use and mortality in the United States.一项关于美国无烟烟草使用与死亡率的纵向研究。
Int J Cancer. 2017 Jul 15;141(2):264-270. doi: 10.1002/ijc.30736. Epub 2017 Apr 24.
7
Using Electrophysiological Measures to Assess the Consumer Acceptability of Smokeless Tobacco Products.使用电生理测量方法评估无烟烟草制品的消费者接受度。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2016 Sep;18(9):1853-1860. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntw041. Epub 2016 Feb 29.
8
Nicotine delivery and pharmacologic response from Verve, an oral nicotine delivery product.Verve(一种口服尼古丁递送产品)的尼古丁递送及药理反应。
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2015 Sep;136:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2015.06.010. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
9
Estimating the harms of nicotine-containing products using the MCDA approach.使用多标准决策分析(MCDA)方法评估含尼古丁产品的危害。
Eur Addict Res. 2014;20(5):218-25. doi: 10.1159/000360220. Epub 2014 Apr 3.
10
The acceptability of nicotine containing products as alternatives to cigarettes: findings from two pilot studies.含尼古丁产品作为香烟替代品的可接受性:两项初步研究结果。
Harm Reduct J. 2011 Oct 12;8:27. doi: 10.1186/1477-7517-8-27.