Altria Client Services LLC, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
Celerion Inc., Lincoln, Nebraska, USA.
Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2021 Mar;10(3):241-250. doi: 10.1002/cpdd.909. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
Novel noncombustible tobacco products offer adult smokers (ASs) alternatives to combustible cigarettes lower on the continuum of risk; however, the abuse potential of such products has not been well studied. The objective of this study was to evaluate the abuse potential of 2 chewable tobacco-derived nicotine containing products, VERVE Chews Blue Mint (test 1) and Green Mint (test 2), in ASs compared with own-brand cigarettes (CIGS) and nicotine polacrilex gum (GUM) using subjective measures and nicotine pharmacokinetics. ASs used the test products during a 5-day at-home trial prior to completing an in-clinic 4-period randomized crossover study. During the study ASs used test products, CIGS, and GUM once on separate days. Responses to Tobacco/Nicotine Withdrawal and Direct Effects of Product questionnaires were documented, and blood samples were collected to assess nicotine pharmacokinetics during each product use. Nicotine pharmacokinetic parameters (C and AUC) were statistically significantly lower with use of test products compared with CIGS and statistically significantly higher compared with GUM. No appreciable differences were noted between the 2 flavors for any of the end points measured. Reductions in maximum urge to smoke and maximum responses to the question "Is the Product 'Pleasant' Right Now?" for the test products were statistically significantly lower than CIGS but comparable to GUM. Similar results were observed for responses to other items in the 2 questionnaires. The test products, under the conditions of this study, carry lower abuse potential than own-brand cigarettes and similar to nicotine polacrilex gum.
新型不可燃烟草产品为成年吸烟者(ASs)提供了比可燃香烟风险更低的替代品;然而,这些产品的滥用潜力尚未得到充分研究。本研究的目的是评估 2 种咀嚼烟草衍生含尼古丁产品,VERVE Chews 蓝色薄荷(测试 1)和绿色薄荷(测试 2)在 ASs 中的滥用潜力,与自有品牌香烟(CIGS)和尼古丁聚醋酸酯口香糖(GUM)进行比较,使用主观测量和尼古丁药代动力学。ASs 在进行 4 期随机交叉诊所研究之前,在家中进行了为期 5 天的试用,在此期间使用了测试产品。在研究期间,ASs 每天分别使用测试产品、CIGS 和 GUM。记录了烟草/尼古丁戒断和产品直接效应问卷的回答,并采集了血样,以评估每次使用产品时的尼古丁药代动力学。与 CIGS 相比,使用测试产品时尼古丁药代动力学参数(C 和 AUC)统计学上显著降低,与 GUM 相比统计学上显著升高。在测量的任何终点中,2 种口味之间均未观察到明显差异。与 CIGS 相比,测试产品的最大吸烟冲动和“产品现在是否令人愉悦?”问题的最大反应显著降低,但与 GUM 相当。在这 2 个问卷中的其他项目的反应中也观察到了类似的结果。在本研究条件下,测试产品的滥用潜力低于自有品牌香烟,与尼古丁聚醋酸酯口香糖相当。