• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成人烟民使用不同尼古丁含量的尼古丁袋与可燃香烟和湿无烟烟草后尼古丁药代动力学和主观反应的比较。

Nicotine pharmacokinetics and subjective responses after using nicotine pouches with different nicotine levels compared to combustible cigarettes and moist smokeless tobacco in adult tobacco users.

机构信息

Center for Research and Technology, Altria Client Services LLC, 601 East Jackson Street, Richmond, VA, 23219, USA.

出版信息

Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2022 Sep;239(9):2863-2873. doi: 10.1007/s00213-022-06172-y. Epub 2022 Jul 23.

DOI:10.1007/s00213-022-06172-y
PMID:35869988
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9385814/
Abstract

RATIONALE

Oral tobacco-derived nicotine products include on!® nicotine pouches (NPs) which are tobacco-leaf free and available in multiple flavors and nicotine levels. Switching completely to NPs from cigarettes and moist smokeless tobacco (MST) has the potential to reduce harm for adult tobacco consumers. However, the dependence potential of NPs is not established. Therefore, we characterized the abuse potential of NPs with different nicotine levels compared to cigarettes and MST.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate nicotine pharmacokinetics (PK) and subjective effects of NPs (ranging from 1.5 to 8 mg nicotine) compared to own brand cigarettes (OBCs) and MST (OBMST).

METHODS

We used a randomized, in-clinic, partial single-blind, 7-way crossover design to assess nicotine PK and subjective effects in dual users of cigarettes and MST.

RESULTS

The mean nicotine C for NPs increased with nicotine level, ranging from 3.5 ng/mL (1.5 mg NP) to 15.4 ng/mL (8 mg NP), compared with 12.2 ng/mL for OBCs and 9.8 ng/mL for OBMST. Nicotine t was much longer for all NPs and OBMST (32.5-34.4 min) compared to OBCs (8.5 min). Reductions in urges to smoke after use of the 2 mg, 3.5 mg, and 8 mg NPs were not statistically different (p > 0.05) relative to OBC. Also, NPs resulted in lower ratings of positive subjective effects relative to OBCs and OBMST.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, based on the study results and literature reported nicotine PK values for cigarettes and MST, the abuse potential of NPs is not likely to be higher than OBCs and OBMST. NPs may be potentially acceptable switching products for users of cigarettes and MST products.

摘要

背景

口服烟草衍生尼古丁产品包括 ON!®尼古丁袋(NP),它是无烟草叶的,有多种口味和尼古丁含量。与香烟和湿无烟烟草(MST)完全转换为 NP,有可能降低成年烟草使用者的危害。然而,NP 的依赖潜力尚未确定。因此,我们比较了不同尼古丁含量的 NP 与香烟和 MST 的滥用潜力。

目的

评估 NP(尼古丁含量从 1.5 毫克到 8 毫克)与自有品牌香烟(OBC)和 MST(OBMST)相比的尼古丁药代动力学(PK)和主观效应。

方法

我们使用随机、门诊、部分单盲、7 向交叉设计,评估香烟和 MST 双重使用者的尼古丁 PK 和主观效应。

结果

NP 的平均尼古丁 C 随尼古丁水平增加,范围从 3.5ng/mL(1.5mg NP)到 15.4ng/mL(8mg NP),而 OBC 为 12.2ng/mL,OBMST 为 9.8ng/mL。所有 NP 和 OBMST 的尼古丁 t 都比 OBC 长(32.5-34.4 分钟)。与 OBC 相比,使用 2mg、3.5mg 和 8mg NP 后吸烟的欲望降低没有统计学差异(p>0.05)。此外,NP 产生的正主观效应评分低于 OBC 和 OBMST。

结论

总的来说,根据研究结果和文献报告的香烟和 MST 的尼古丁 PK 值,NP 的滥用潜力不太可能高于 OBC 和 OBMST。NP 可能是香烟和 MST 使用者潜在可接受的转换产品。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b003/9385814/8d07b69b5dce/213_2022_6172_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b003/9385814/81e768c70dc2/213_2022_6172_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b003/9385814/cc664fbde03f/213_2022_6172_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b003/9385814/8d07b69b5dce/213_2022_6172_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b003/9385814/81e768c70dc2/213_2022_6172_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b003/9385814/cc664fbde03f/213_2022_6172_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b003/9385814/8d07b69b5dce/213_2022_6172_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Nicotine pharmacokinetics and subjective responses after using nicotine pouches with different nicotine levels compared to combustible cigarettes and moist smokeless tobacco in adult tobacco users.成人烟民使用不同尼古丁含量的尼古丁袋与可燃香烟和湿无烟烟草后尼古丁药代动力学和主观反应的比较。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2022 Sep;239(9):2863-2873. doi: 10.1007/s00213-022-06172-y. Epub 2022 Jul 23.
2
Nicotine pharmacokinetics and subjective response among adult smokers using different flavors of on!® nicotine pouches compared to combustible cigarettes.比较成年吸烟者使用不同口味的 on!® 尼古丁袋与可燃香烟的尼古丁药代动力学和主观反应。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2021 Nov;238(11):3325-3334. doi: 10.1007/s00213-021-05948-y. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
3
A Randomised Study to Investigate the Nicotine Pharmacokinetics of Oral Nicotine Pouches and a Combustible Cigarette.一项调查口服尼古丁袋和可燃香烟尼古丁药代动力学的随机研究。
Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2022 Mar;47(2):211-221. doi: 10.1007/s13318-021-00742-9. Epub 2021 Dec 18.
4
Assessment of Abuse Liability and Nicotine Pharmacokinetics of glo Heated Tobacco Products in a Randomized, Crossover Study.加热不燃烧烟草制品滥用倾向评估及其尼古丁药代动力学的随机交叉研究。
Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2024 Nov;49(6):733-750. doi: 10.1007/s13318-024-00921-4. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
5
Characterization of the nicotine uptake and safety of Nordic spirit tobacco-free oral nicotine pouches: A randomized cross-over study.北欧精神牌无烟口腔尼古丁袋的尼古丁摄取特性及安全性:一项随机交叉研究。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2025 Apr;242(4):855-865. doi: 10.1007/s00213-024-06721-7. Epub 2024 Nov 23.
6
Randomized crossover clinical studies to assess abuse liability and nicotine pharmacokinetics of Velo Oral Nicotine pouches.评估Velo口腔尼古丁袋滥用可能性和尼古丁药代动力学的随机交叉临床研究。
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Mar 13;16:1547073. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1547073. eCollection 2025.
7
A randomised, open-label, cross-over clinical study to evaluate the pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and safety and tolerability profiles of tobacco-free oral nicotine pouches relative to cigarettes.一项随机、开放标签、交叉临床研究,评估无烟草口含尼古丁袋与香烟相比的药代动力学、药效学以及安全性和耐受性特征。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2022 Sep;239(9):2931-2943. doi: 10.1007/s00213-022-06178-6. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
8
A randomised, crossover, clinical study to assess nicotine pharmacokinetics and subjective effects of the BIDI stick ENDS compared with combustible cigarettes and a comparator ENDS in adult smokers.一项随机、交叉、临床研究,旨在评估 BIDI 烟弹 ENDS 与可燃香烟和一种对照型 ENDS 在成年吸烟者中的尼古丁药代动力学和主观效应。
Harm Reduct J. 2022 Jun 2;19(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12954-022-00638-0.
9
Characterization of the Abuse Potential in Adult Smokers of a Novel Oral Tobacco Product Relative to Combustible Cigarettes and Nicotine Polacrilex Gum.新型口服烟草制品相对于可燃香烟和尼古丁胶对成年吸烟者的滥用潜力的特征描述。
Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2021 Mar;10(3):241-250. doi: 10.1002/cpdd.909. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
10
Abuse liability assessment of the JUUL system in four flavors relative to combustible cigarette, nicotine gum and a comparator electronic nicotine delivery system among adult smokers.四种口味 JUUL 系统相对于可燃香烟、尼古丁口香糖和一种比较电子尼古丁输送系统在成年吸烟者中的滥用倾向评估。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020 Dec 1;217:108395. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108395. Epub 2020 Nov 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of oral nicotine pouches on cigarette smoking behaviour and tobacco harm exposure: a randomised pilot trial in adults.口服尼古丁袋对吸烟行为和烟草危害暴露的影响:一项针对成年人的随机试点试验。
Tob Control. 2025 Jun 23. doi: 10.1136/tc-2024-059094.
2
Nicotine Pouch and E-Cigarette Use and Co-Use Among US Youths in 2023 and 2024.2023年和2024年美国青少年使用尼古丁袋和电子烟及同时使用的情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Apr 1;8(4):e256739. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.6739.
3
Oral Nicotine Pouches: Rising Popularity and State of the Science.

本文引用的文献

1
Human Abuse Liability Assessment of Tobacco and Nicotine Products: Approaches for Meeting Current Regulatory Recommendations.烟草和尼古丁产品的人类滥用风险评估:满足当前监管建议的方法
Nicotine Tob Res. 2022 Feb 14;24(3):295-305. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntab183.
2
Nicotine pharmacokinetics and subjective response among adult smokers using different flavors of on!® nicotine pouches compared to combustible cigarettes.比较成年吸烟者使用不同口味的 on!® 尼古丁袋与可燃香烟的尼古丁药代动力学和主观反应。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2021 Nov;238(11):3325-3334. doi: 10.1007/s00213-021-05948-y. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
3
Nicotine delivery and user reactions to Juul EU (20 mg/ml) compared with Juul US (59 mg/ml), cigarettes and other e-cigarette products.
口服尼古丁袋:日益普及与科学现状
Public Health Rep. 2025 Apr 28:333549251313668. doi: 10.1177/00333549251313668.
4
Oral health effects of non-combustible nicotine products: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.非燃烧性尼古丁产品对口腔健康的影响:系统评价与网络荟萃分析方案
Syst Rev. 2025 Apr 17;14(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s13643-025-02839-7.
5
Randomized crossover clinical studies to assess abuse liability and nicotine pharmacokinetics of Velo Oral Nicotine pouches.评估Velo口腔尼古丁袋滥用可能性和尼古丁药代动力学的随机交叉临床研究。
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Mar 13;16:1547073. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1547073. eCollection 2025.
6
A comprehensive review on oral nicotine pouches: Available scientific evidence and future research needs.关于口服尼古丁袋的全面综述:现有科学证据及未来研究需求
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2025 Apr;33(2):123-132. doi: 10.1037/pha0000755. Epub 2024 Dec 2.
7
Characterization of the nicotine uptake and safety of Nordic spirit tobacco-free oral nicotine pouches: A randomized cross-over study.北欧精神牌无烟口腔尼古丁袋的尼古丁摄取特性及安全性:一项随机交叉研究。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2025 Apr;242(4):855-865. doi: 10.1007/s00213-024-06721-7. Epub 2024 Nov 23.
8
Nicotine Toxicity From Repeat Use of Nicotine Pouches.重复使用尼古丁袋导致的尼古丁中毒
Nicotine Tob Res. 2025 Mar 24;27(4):767-768. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntae111.
9
The Potential Impact of Oral Nicotine Pouches on Public Health: A Scoping Review.口服尼古丁袋对公众健康的潜在影响:一项范围综述
Nicotine Tob Res. 2025 Mar 24;27(4):598-610. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntae131.
10
Small pouches, but high nicotine doses-nicotine delivery and acute effects after use of tobacco-free nicotine pouches.小烟袋,但尼古丁剂量高——使用无烟尼古丁小烟袋后的尼古丁递送及急性效应
Front Pharmacol. 2024 May 22;15:1392027. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1392027. eCollection 2024.
与 Juul US(59mg/ml)相比,Juul EU(20mg/ml)的尼古丁输送和用户反应与香烟和其他电子烟产品的比较。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2021 Mar;238(3):825-831. doi: 10.1007/s00213-020-05734-2. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
4
Tobacco Product Use Among Adults - United States, 2019.成年人烟草制品使用情况 - 美国,2019 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Nov 20;69(46):1736-1742. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6946a4.
5
Abuse liability assessment of the JUUL system in four flavors relative to combustible cigarette, nicotine gum and a comparator electronic nicotine delivery system among adult smokers.四种口味 JUUL 系统相对于可燃香烟、尼古丁口香糖和一种比较电子尼古丁输送系统在成年吸烟者中的滥用倾向评估。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020 Dec 1;217:108395. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108395. Epub 2020 Nov 4.
6
Pharmacokinetic Comparison of a Novel Non-tobacco-Based Nicotine Pouch (ZYN) With Conventional, Tobacco-Based Swedish Snus and American Moist Snuff.新型非烟草尼古丁袋(ZYN)与传统烟草瑞典鼻烟和美国湿鼻烟的药代动力学比较。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 Oct 8;22(10):1757-1763. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntaa068.
7
Cigarette smokers' concurrent use of smokeless tobacco: dual use patterns and nicotine exposure.烟民同时使用无烟烟草制品:双重使用模式和尼古丁暴露。
Tob Control. 2021 Jan;30(1):24-29. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-055345. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
8
Randomized within-subject trial to evaluate smokers' initial perceptions, subjective effects and nicotine delivery across six vaporized nicotine products.一项在吸烟者中开展的随机、自身对照试验,旨在评估 6 种电子烟产品的初始感知、主观效应和尼古丁传递。
Addiction. 2019 Jul;114(7):1236-1248. doi: 10.1111/add.14602. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
9
A randomised, open-label, cross-over clinical study to evaluate the pharmacokinetic profiles of cigarettes and e-cigarettes with nicotine salt formulations in US adult smokers.一项随机、开放标签、交叉临床试验,旨在评估含尼古丁盐配方的香烟和电子烟在美籍成年吸烟者中的药代动力学特征。
Intern Emerg Med. 2019 Sep;14(6):853-861. doi: 10.1007/s11739-019-02025-3. Epub 2019 Feb 2.
10
Assessment of the abuse liability of three menthol Vuse Solo electronic cigarettes relative to combustible cigarettes and nicotine gum.评估三种薄荷味 Vuse Solo 电子烟相对于可燃香烟和尼古丁口香糖的滥用倾向。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2018 Jul;235(7):2077-2086. doi: 10.1007/s00213-018-4904-x. Epub 2018 May 3.