• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根据计划分娩时的孕龄评估胎盘植入女性的非计划性分娩风险。

Risk of unscheduled delivery in women with placenta accreta according to planned gestational age at delivery.

机构信息

Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

出版信息

J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Dec;35(25):5308-5311. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2021.1878493. Epub 2021 Jan 27.

DOI:10.1080/14767058.2021.1878493
PMID:33504230
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The optimal gestational age at delivery for stable women with suspected placenta accreta is still subject of debate.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the likelihood of vaginal bleeding necessitating expedited delivery in women with placenta accreta according to gestational age at planned cesarean hysterectomy.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a multicenter cohort study. Singleton pregnancies at risk of placenta accreta because of placenta previa in the setting of prior cesarean delivery were included. Outcomes were compared in cohort of women who had planned cesarean hysterectomy at 34 0/7 - 34 6/7 weeks versus at 35 0/7 - 35 6/7 weeks. The primary outcome was incidence of vaginal bleeding severe enough to necessitate delivery.

RESULTS

118 singleton pregnancies with placenta previa in the setting of prior cesarean delivery, and confirmed placenta accreta at the time of delivery were included in the study. Women who had planned cesarean hysterectomy at 34 weeks had lower episodes of vaginal bleeding severe enough to necessitate immediate or emergency delivery (20.6% vs 38.0%; odds ratio (OR) 0.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.19 to 0.96). Eight women (11.8%) in the 34 weeks group and 6 women (12.0%) in the 35 weeks group delivered before the planned date due to onset of spontaneous labor (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.32 to 3.02).

CONCLUSION

In singleton gestations with suspected placenta accreta, planned cesarean hysterectomy at 34 0/7 - 34 6/7 weeks was associated with a decreased chance of unscheduled delivery due to severe vaginal bleeding.

CONDENSATION

In case of placenta accreta, planned cesarean hysterectomy at 34 weeks was associated with decreased chance of unscheduled delivery due to severe vaginal bleeding.

摘要

背景

对于疑似胎盘植入的稳定孕妇,最佳分娩孕龄仍存在争议。

目的

根据计划行剖宫产子宫切除术的孕龄,估计胎盘植入孕妇发生需要紧急分娩的阴道出血的可能性。

研究设计

这是一项多中心队列研究。纳入因既往剖宫产而有前置胎盘风险且有胎盘植入的单胎妊娠。比较了计划在 34 0/7-34 6/7 周行剖宫产子宫切除术的孕妇和计划在 35 0/7-35 6/7 周行剖宫产子宫切除术的孕妇的结局。主要结局是阴道出血严重程度足以需要分娩的发生率。

结果

研究纳入了 118 例因既往剖宫产而有前置胎盘且在分娩时确诊胎盘植入的单胎妊娠。计划在 34 周行剖宫产子宫切除术的孕妇阴道出血严重程度足以需要立即或紧急分娩的发生率较低(20.6%比 38.0%;优势比(OR)0.42,95%置信区间(CI)0.19 至 0.96)。34 周组中有 8 例(11.8%)和 35 周组中有 6 例(12.0%)孕妇因自发临产而在计划分娩日期前分娩(OR 0.98,95% CI 0.32 至 3.02)。

结论

在疑似胎盘植入的单胎妊娠中,计划在 34 0/7-34 6/7 周行剖宫产子宫切除术与因严重阴道出血而导致无计划分娩的几率降低相关。

关键词

胎盘植入;剖宫产子宫切除术;阴道出血;分娩时机

相似文献

1
Risk of unscheduled delivery in women with placenta accreta according to planned gestational age at delivery.根据计划分娩时的孕龄评估胎盘植入女性的非计划性分娩风险。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Dec;35(25):5308-5311. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2021.1878493. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
2
Placenta accreta and vaginal bleeding according to gestational age at delivery.胎盘植入与分娩时孕周相关的阴道出血情况。
Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Apr;125(4):808-813. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000674.
3
Use of routine ureteral stents in cesarean hysterectomy for placenta accreta.在胎盘植入的剖宫产子宫切除术时常规使用输尿管支架。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021 Feb;34(3):386-389. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1609935. Epub 2019 May 2.
4
[Risk factors of peripartum hysterectomy in placenta previa: a retrospective study of 3 840 cases].前置胎盘产妇围产期子宫切除术的危险因素:3840例回顾性研究
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Jul 25;51(7):498-502. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567X.2016.07.004.
5
Prenatal identification of invasive placentation using ultrasound in women with placenta previa and prior cesarean delivery.在前置胎盘且有剖宫产史的妇女中,利用超声进行侵袭性胎盘的产前诊断。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2024 Nov;302:97-103. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.08.035. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
6
Determinants of emergency Cesarean delivery in pregnancies complicated by placenta previa with or without placenta accreta spectrum disorder: analysis of ADoPAD cohort.伴有或不伴有胎盘植入谱系疾病的前置胎盘孕妇行急诊剖宫产术的决定因素:ADO-PAD 队列分析。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Feb;63(2):243-250. doi: 10.1002/uog.27465.
7
Risk factors for unscheduled delivery in patients with placenta accreta.胎盘植入患者非计划性分娩的风险因素。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Mar;210(3):241.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.09.044. Epub 2013 Oct 2.
8
Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis and outcome of placenta previa accreta after cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.剖宫产术后胎盘植入的产前超声诊断及结局:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jul;217(1):27-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.02.050. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
9
Peripartum hysterectomy due to severe postpartum hemorrhage: A hospital-based study.因产后大出血行产后子宫切除术:一项基于医院的研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022 Jul;101(7):819-826. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14358. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
10
The risk of abnormal placentation and hemorrhage in subsequent pregnancy following primary elective cesarean delivery.首次选择性剖宫产术后再次妊娠时异常胎盘位置和出血的风险。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 Nov;33(21):3608-3613. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1581167. Epub 2019 Feb 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Oil-based vitamin E oral spray for oral health in pregnancy.用于孕期口腔健康的油基维生素E口腔喷雾。
Future Sci OA. 2022 Mar 1;8(4):FSO790. doi: 10.2144/fsoa-2021-0095. eCollection 2022 Apr.
2
Role of Abdominal Aortic Balloon Placement in Planned Conservative Management of Placenta Previa With Placenta Increta or Percreta.腹主动脉球囊置入在前置胎盘合并胎盘植入或穿透性胎盘植入计划性保守治疗中的作用
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Dec 14;8:767748. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.767748. eCollection 2021.