• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创伤性脑损伤中自动调节或固定的脑灌注压目标:从能量代谢角度确定哪种更好。

Autoregulatory or Fixed Cerebral Perfusion Pressure Targets in Traumatic Brain Injury: Determining Which Is Better in an Energy Metabolic Perspective.

作者信息

Svedung Wettervik Teodor, Howells Timothy, Hillered Lars, Rostami Elham, Lewén Anders, Enblad Per

机构信息

Department of Neuroscience, Section of Neurosurgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

出版信息

J Neurotrauma. 2021 Jul 15;38(14):1969-1978. doi: 10.1089/neu.2020.7290. Epub 2021 Mar 1.

DOI:10.1089/neu.2020.7290
PMID:33504257
Abstract

Current guidelines in traumatic brain injury (TBI) recommend a cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) within the fixed interval of 60-70 mm Hg. However, the autoregulatory, optimal CPP target (CPPopt) might yield better cerebral blood flow (CBF) regulation. In this study, we investigated fixed versus autoregulatory CPP targets in relation to cerebral energy metabolism and clinical outcome after TBI. Ninety-eight non-craniectomized patients with severe TBI treated in the neurointensive care unit, Uppsala University Hospital, Sweden, 2008-2018, were included. Data from cerebral microdialysis (MD), intracranial pressure (ICP), pressure autoregulation, CPP and CPPopt55-15 (a variant of CPPopt based on filtered slow waves from 15-55 sec range) were analyzed the first 10 days. The good monitoring time (GMT %) below/within/above the fixed and autoregulatory CPP targets were calculated. CPPopt55-15 was >70 mm Hg 74% of the time the first 10 days. Higher GMT (%) ΔCPPopt55-15 ± 10 mm Hg correlated with lower lactate/pyruvate ratio (LPR) on day 1 and lower cerebral glycerol on days 6-10, and predicted favorable clinical outcome. Higher GMT (%) CPP within 60-70 mm Hg correlated with lower cerebral glucose on days 2-10 and higher LPR on days 6-10, but predicted favorable clinical outcome. Higher GMT (%) CPP >70 mm Hg had the opposite associations; that is, with higher cerebral glucose and lower LPR, but unfavorable clinical outcome. Autoregulatory CPP targets may be beneficial, because patients with CPP values close to the optimal CPP had both better cerebral energy metabolism and better clinical outcome, but this needs to be evaluated in randomized trials.

摘要

创伤性脑损伤(TBI)的现行指南建议将脑灌注压(CPP)维持在60 - 70 mmHg的固定区间内。然而,自动调节的最佳CPP目标(CPPopt)可能会产生更好的脑血流量(CBF)调节效果。在本研究中,我们调查了固定CPP目标与自动调节CPP目标在TBI后脑能量代谢和临床结局方面的差异。纳入了2008年至2018年在瑞典乌普萨拉大学医院神经重症监护病房接受治疗的98例未行颅骨切除术的重度TBI患者。分析了前10天来自脑微透析(MD)、颅内压(ICP)、压力自动调节、CPP和CPPopt55 - 15(基于15 - 55秒范围内滤波慢波的CPPopt变体)的数据。计算了固定和自动调节CPP目标以下/之内/之上的良好监测时间(GMT%)。在前10天中,74%的时间里CPPopt55 - 15 > 70 mmHg。较高的GMT(%)ΔCPPopt55 - 15±10 mmHg与第1天较低的乳酸/丙酮酸比值(LPR)以及第6 - 10天较低的脑甘油水平相关,并预测了良好的临床结局。较高的GMT(%)CPP在60 - 70 mmHg之间与第2 - 10天较低的脑葡萄糖水平以及第6 - 10天较高的LPR相关,但也预测了良好的临床结局。较高的GMT(%)CPP > 70 mmHg则有相反的关联;即与较高脑葡萄糖水平和较低LPR相关,但临床结局不佳。自动调节的CPP目标可能有益,因为CPP值接近最佳CPP的患者脑能量代谢更好且临床结局更佳,但这需要在随机试验中进行评估。

相似文献

1
Autoregulatory or Fixed Cerebral Perfusion Pressure Targets in Traumatic Brain Injury: Determining Which Is Better in an Energy Metabolic Perspective.创伤性脑损伤中自动调节或固定的脑灌注压目标:从能量代谢角度确定哪种更好。
J Neurotrauma. 2021 Jul 15;38(14):1969-1978. doi: 10.1089/neu.2020.7290. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
2
Blood Pressure Variability and Optimal Cerebral Perfusion Pressure-New Therapeutic Targets in Traumatic Brain Injury.血压变异性与最佳脑灌注压:创伤性脑损伤的新治疗靶点。
Neurosurgery. 2020 Mar 1;86(3):E300-E309. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyz515.
3
The effects of cerebral pressure autoregulation status and CPP levels on cerebral metabolism in pediatric traumatic brain injury.小儿创伤性脑损伤中脑压力自动调节状态和脑灌注压水平对脑代谢的影响。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2024 Apr 24;166(1):190. doi: 10.1007/s00701-024-06085-z.
4
Should Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury with Significant Contusions be Treated with Different Neurointensive Care Targets?创伤性脑损伤伴大挫伤患者是否应采用不同的神经重症监护目标治疗?
Neurocrit Care. 2024 Oct;41(2):511-522. doi: 10.1007/s12028-024-01954-y. Epub 2024 Mar 20.
5
Temporal Neurophysiological Dynamics in Traumatic Brain Injury: Role of Pressure Reactivity and Optimal Cerebral Perfusion Pressure for Predicting Outcome.创伤性脑损伤的时间神经生理动力学:压力反应和最佳脑灌注压在预测结果中的作用。
J Neurotrauma. 2019 Jun;36(11):1818-1827. doi: 10.1089/neu.2018.6157. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
6
Autoregulatory Cerebral Perfusion Pressure Insults in Traumatic Brain Injury and Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: The Role of Insult Intensity and Duration on Clinical Outcome.颅脑创伤和颅内动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血的自动调节性脑灌注压损伤:损伤强度和持续时间对临床转归的作用。
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2024 Jul 1;36(3):228-236. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0000000000000922. Epub 2023 May 17.
7
Intracranial pressure- and cerebral perfusion pressure threshold-insults in relation to cerebral energy metabolism in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.颅内压和脑灌注压阈值损伤与颅内出血患者脑能量代谢的关系。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2022 Apr;164(4):1001-1014. doi: 10.1007/s00701-022-05169-y. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
8
Pressure autoregulation monitoring and cerebral perfusion pressure target recommendation in patients with severe traumatic brain injury based on minute-by-minute monitoring data.基于逐分钟监测数据的重型颅脑损伤患者压力自动调节监测及脑灌注压目标推荐
J Neurosurg. 2014 Jun;120(6):1451-7. doi: 10.3171/2014.3.JNS131500. Epub 2014 Apr 18.
9
Novel index for predicting mortality during the first 24 hours after traumatic brain injury.预测创伤性脑损伤后 24 小时内死亡率的新指标。
J Neurosurg. 2018 Dec 21;131(6):1887-1895. doi: 10.3171/2018.7.JNS18995. Print 2019 Dec 1.
10
Impact of Therapeutic Interventions on Cerebral Autoregulatory Function Following Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Secondary Analysis of the BOOST-II Study.治疗干预对严重创伤性脑损伤后脑自动调节功能的影响:BOOST-II 研究的二次分析。
Neurocrit Care. 2024 Aug;41(1):91-99. doi: 10.1007/s12028-023-01896-x. Epub 2023 Dec 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Visualizations of autoregulatory insults in moderate-to-severe paediatric traumatic brain injury: a secondary analysis from the multicentre STARSHIP trial.中重度小儿创伤性脑损伤中自动调节损伤的可视化:多中心STARSHIP试验的二次分析
Crit Care. 2025 Aug 4;29(1):344. doi: 10.1186/s13054-025-05568-4.
2
Continuous personalized cerebrovascular reactivity-based physiologic metrics in neurocritical care: a narrative review of the current landscape, limitations, and future directions.神经重症监护中基于持续个性化脑血管反应性的生理指标:对当前现状、局限性及未来方向的叙述性综述
Front Physiol. 2025 May 6;16:1582813. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1582813. eCollection 2025.
3
Intracranial pressure dynamics, cerebral autoregulation, and brain perfusion after decompressive craniectomy in malignant middle cerebral artery infarction: is there a role for invasive monitoring?
恶性大脑中动脉梗死减压性颅骨切除术后的颅内压动态、脑自动调节和脑灌注:有创监测有作用吗?
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2025 May 9;167(1):135. doi: 10.1007/s00701-025-06537-0.
4
Individualized autoregulation-guided arterial blood pressure management in neurocritical care.神经重症监护中基于个体化自动调节指导的动脉血压管理
Neurotherapeutics. 2025 Jan;22(1):e00526. doi: 10.1016/j.neurot.2025.e00526. Epub 2025 Jan 18.
5
Preliminary Observations of the Loke Microdialysis in an Experimental Pig Model: Are We Ready for Continuous Monitoring of Brain Energy Metabolism?洛氏微透析在实验猪模型中的初步观察:我们是否准备好对脑能量代谢进行连续监测?
Neurocrit Care. 2025 Feb;42(1):222-231. doi: 10.1007/s12028-024-02080-5. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
6
Individualized Autoregulation-Derived Cerebral Perfusion Targets in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A New Therapeutic Avenue?个体化自动调节衍生脑灌注目标在颅内动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血中的应用:新的治疗途径?
J Intensive Care Med. 2024 Nov;39(11):1083-1092. doi: 10.1177/08850666241252415. Epub 2024 May 5.
7
The effects of cerebral pressure autoregulation status and CPP levels on cerebral metabolism in pediatric traumatic brain injury.小儿创伤性脑损伤中脑压力自动调节状态和脑灌注压水平对脑代谢的影响。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2024 Apr 24;166(1):190. doi: 10.1007/s00701-024-06085-z.
8
Should Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury with Significant Contusions be Treated with Different Neurointensive Care Targets?创伤性脑损伤伴大挫伤患者是否应采用不同的神经重症监护目标治疗?
Neurocrit Care. 2024 Oct;41(2):511-522. doi: 10.1007/s12028-024-01954-y. Epub 2024 Mar 20.
9
The pressure reactivity index as a measure of cerebral autoregulation and its application in traumatic brain injury management.作为脑自动调节指标的压力反应性指数及其在创伤性脑损伤管理中的应用。
Crit Care Resusc. 2023 Dec 14;25(4):229-236. doi: 10.1016/j.ccrj.2023.10.009. eCollection 2023 Dec.
10
Brain tissue oxygen monitoring in traumatic brain injury: part I-To what extent does PbtO reflect global cerebral physiology?颅脑创伤患者脑组织氧监测:第一部分-PbtO 反映了多大程度的整体脑生理学?
Crit Care. 2023 Aug 31;27(1):339. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04627-y.