Suppr超能文献

创伤性脑损伤中自动调节或固定的脑灌注压目标:从能量代谢角度确定哪种更好。

Autoregulatory or Fixed Cerebral Perfusion Pressure Targets in Traumatic Brain Injury: Determining Which Is Better in an Energy Metabolic Perspective.

作者信息

Svedung Wettervik Teodor, Howells Timothy, Hillered Lars, Rostami Elham, Lewén Anders, Enblad Per

机构信息

Department of Neuroscience, Section of Neurosurgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

出版信息

J Neurotrauma. 2021 Jul 15;38(14):1969-1978. doi: 10.1089/neu.2020.7290. Epub 2021 Mar 1.

Abstract

Current guidelines in traumatic brain injury (TBI) recommend a cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) within the fixed interval of 60-70 mm Hg. However, the autoregulatory, optimal CPP target (CPPopt) might yield better cerebral blood flow (CBF) regulation. In this study, we investigated fixed versus autoregulatory CPP targets in relation to cerebral energy metabolism and clinical outcome after TBI. Ninety-eight non-craniectomized patients with severe TBI treated in the neurointensive care unit, Uppsala University Hospital, Sweden, 2008-2018, were included. Data from cerebral microdialysis (MD), intracranial pressure (ICP), pressure autoregulation, CPP and CPPopt55-15 (a variant of CPPopt based on filtered slow waves from 15-55 sec range) were analyzed the first 10 days. The good monitoring time (GMT %) below/within/above the fixed and autoregulatory CPP targets were calculated. CPPopt55-15 was >70 mm Hg 74% of the time the first 10 days. Higher GMT (%) ΔCPPopt55-15 ± 10 mm Hg correlated with lower lactate/pyruvate ratio (LPR) on day 1 and lower cerebral glycerol on days 6-10, and predicted favorable clinical outcome. Higher GMT (%) CPP within 60-70 mm Hg correlated with lower cerebral glucose on days 2-10 and higher LPR on days 6-10, but predicted favorable clinical outcome. Higher GMT (%) CPP >70 mm Hg had the opposite associations; that is, with higher cerebral glucose and lower LPR, but unfavorable clinical outcome. Autoregulatory CPP targets may be beneficial, because patients with CPP values close to the optimal CPP had both better cerebral energy metabolism and better clinical outcome, but this needs to be evaluated in randomized trials.

摘要

创伤性脑损伤(TBI)的现行指南建议将脑灌注压(CPP)维持在60 - 70 mmHg的固定区间内。然而,自动调节的最佳CPP目标(CPPopt)可能会产生更好的脑血流量(CBF)调节效果。在本研究中,我们调查了固定CPP目标与自动调节CPP目标在TBI后脑能量代谢和临床结局方面的差异。纳入了2008年至2018年在瑞典乌普萨拉大学医院神经重症监护病房接受治疗的98例未行颅骨切除术的重度TBI患者。分析了前10天来自脑微透析(MD)、颅内压(ICP)、压力自动调节、CPP和CPPopt55 - 15(基于15 - 55秒范围内滤波慢波的CPPopt变体)的数据。计算了固定和自动调节CPP目标以下/之内/之上的良好监测时间(GMT%)。在前10天中,74%的时间里CPPopt55 - 15 > 70 mmHg。较高的GMT(%)ΔCPPopt55 - 15±10 mmHg与第1天较低的乳酸/丙酮酸比值(LPR)以及第6 - 10天较低的脑甘油水平相关,并预测了良好的临床结局。较高的GMT(%)CPP在60 - 70 mmHg之间与第2 - 10天较低的脑葡萄糖水平以及第6 - 10天较高的LPR相关,但也预测了良好的临床结局。较高的GMT(%)CPP > 70 mmHg则有相反的关联;即与较高脑葡萄糖水平和较低LPR相关,但临床结局不佳。自动调节的CPP目标可能有益,因为CPP值接近最佳CPP的患者脑能量代谢更好且临床结局更佳,但这需要在随机试验中进行评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验