• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心肌梗死且无阻塞性冠状动脉疾病患者的抗血小板治疗。

Antiplatelet therapy in patients with myocardial infarction without obstructive coronary artery disease.

机构信息

Cardiology Division, Heart Center - Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland.

Population Health Research Institute (PHRI), Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Heart. 2021 Nov;107(21):1739-1747. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2020-318045. Epub 2021 Jan 27.

DOI:10.1136/heartjnl-2020-318045
PMID:33504513
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Approximately 10% of patients with myocardial infarction (MI) have no obstructive coronary artery disease. The prognosis and role of intensified antiplatelet therapy in those patients were evaluated.

METHODS

We analysed data from the Clopidogrel and Aspirin Optimal Dose Usage to Reduce Recurrent Events-Seventh Organisation to Assess Strategies in Ischaemic Symptoms trial randomising patients with ACS referred for early intervention to receive either double-dose (600 mg, day 1; 150 mg, days 2-7; then 75 mg/day) or standard-dose (300 mg, day 1; then 75 mg/day) clopidogrel. Outcomes in patients with myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) versus those with obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) and their relation to standard-dose versus double-dose clopidogrel were evaluated. The primary outcome was cardiovascular (CV) death, MI or stroke at 30 days.

RESULTS

We included 23 783 patients with MI and 1599 (6.7%) with MINOCA. Patients with MINOCA were younger, presented more frequently with non-ST-segment elevation MI and had fewer comorbidities. All-cause mortality (0.6% vs 2.3%, p=0.005), CV mortality (0.6% vs 2.2%, p=0.006), repeat MI (0.5% vs 2.3%, p=0.001) and major bleeding (0.6% vs 2.4%, p<0.0001) were lower among patients with MINOCA than among those with obstructive CAD. Among patients with MINOCA, 2.1% of patients in the double-dose clopidogrel group and 0.6% in the standard-dose group experienced a primary outcome (HR 3.57, 95% CI 1.31 to 9.76), whereas in those with obstructive CAD, rates were 4.3% and 4.7%, respectively (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.03; p value for interaction=0.011).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with MINOCA are at lower risk of recurrent CV events compared with patients with MI with obstructive CAD. Compared with a standard clopidogrel-based dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) regimen, an intensified dosing strategy appears to offer no additional benefit with a signal of possible harm. Further randomised trials evaluating the effects of potent DAPT in patients with MINOCA are warranted.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT00335452.

摘要

目的

约有 10%的心肌梗死(MI)患者不存在阻塞性冠状动脉疾病。评估了这些患者强化抗血小板治疗的预后和作用。

方法

我们分析了 Clopidogrel 和 Aspirin Optimal Dose Usage to Reduce Recurrent Events-Seventh Organisation to Assess Strategies in Ischaemic Symptoms 试验的数据,该试验将接受早期介入治疗的 ACS 患者随机分配接受双剂量(第 1 天 600mg,第 2-7 天 150mg,然后每天 75mg)或标准剂量(第 1 天 300mg,然后每天 75mg)氯吡格雷。评估了无阻塞性冠状动脉疾病(MINOCA)与阻塞性冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的 MI 患者的结局及其与标准剂量与双剂量氯吡格雷的关系。主要结局为 30 天内心血管(CV)死亡、MI 或卒中。

结果

我们纳入了 23783 例 MI 患者和 1599 例(6.7%)MINOCA 患者。MINOCA 患者更年轻,更常表现为非 ST 段抬高型 MI,且合并症更少。全因死亡率(0.6%比 2.3%,p=0.005)、CV 死亡率(0.6%比 2.2%,p=0.006)、再发 MI(0.5%比 2.3%,p=0.001)和大出血(0.6%比 2.4%,p<0.0001)在 MINOCA 患者中均低于 CAD 患者。MINOCA 患者中,双剂量氯吡格雷组有 2.1%的患者发生主要结局,标准剂量组有 0.6%(HR 3.57,95%CI 1.31 至 9.76),而 CAD 患者的发生率分别为 4.3%和 4.7%(HR 0.91,95%CI 0.80 至 1.03;p 值交互作用=0.011)。

结论

与 MI 合并阻塞性 CAD 患者相比,MINOCA 患者发生 CV 事件的风险较低。与标准氯吡格雷双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)方案相比,强化剂量策略似乎没有额外获益的迹象,反而可能有害。需要进一步的随机试验来评估在 MINOCA 患者中使用强效 DAPT 的效果。

试验注册编号

NCT00335452。

相似文献

1
Antiplatelet therapy in patients with myocardial infarction without obstructive coronary artery disease.心肌梗死且无阻塞性冠状动脉疾病患者的抗血小板治疗。
Heart. 2021 Nov;107(21):1739-1747. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2020-318045. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
2
Prognosis in relation to high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T levels in patients with myocardial infarction and non-obstructive coronary arteries.心肌梗死和非阻塞性冠状动脉疾病患者与高敏心肌肌钙蛋白 T 水平相关的预后。
Am Heart J. 2018 Jun;200:60-66. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.03.005. Epub 2018 Mar 10.
3
Mortality of Myocardial Infarction by Sex, Age, and Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease Status in the ACTION Registry-GWTG (Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network Registry-Get With the Guidelines).在ACTION注册研究-GWTG(急性冠状动脉治疗与干预结果网络注册研究-遵循指南)中,按性别、年龄和阻塞性冠状动脉疾病状态划分的心肌梗死死亡率
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017 Dec;10(12):e003443. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.003443.
4
Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) in Chinese patients: Clinical features, treatment and 1 year follow-up.中国患者的非阻塞性冠状动脉心肌梗死(MINOCA):临床特征、治疗和 1 年随访。
Int J Cardiol. 2019 Jul 15;287:27-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.02.036. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
5
Characteristics of patients presenting with myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) in Poland: data from the ORPKI national registry.波兰无阻塞性冠状动脉心肌梗死(MINOCA)患者的特征:来自 ORPKI 国家注册中心的数据。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2019 Apr;47(3):462-466. doi: 10.1007/s11239-018-1794-z.
6
Double-Dose Versus Standard-Dose Clopidogrel According to Smoking Status Among Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.双重剂量与标准剂量氯吡格雷在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者中的应用:吸烟状态的影响。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Nov 3;6(11):e006577. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.006577.
7
Discharge aspirin dose and clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes treated with prasugrel versus clopidogrel: an analysis from the TRITON-TIMI 38 study (trial to assess improvement in therapeutic outcomes by optimizing platelet inhibition with prasugrel-thrombolysis in myocardial infarction 38).普拉格雷与氯吡格雷治疗急性冠脉综合征患者的阿司匹林剂量与临床结局:来自 TRITON-TIMI 38 研究的分析(评估通过优化血小板抑制作用改善治疗结局的试验,普拉格雷-心肌梗死溶栓 38)。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Jan 28;63(3):225-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.09.023. Epub 2013 Oct 16.
8
Outcome after myocardial infarction without obstructive coronary artery disease.非阻塞性冠状动脉疾病心肌梗死后的结果。
Heart. 2019 Apr;105(7):524-530. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2018-313665. Epub 2018 Sep 29.
9
Dual antiplatelet therapy for perioperative myocardial infarction following CABG surgery.冠状动脉旁路移植术后围手术期心肌梗死的双联抗血小板治疗。
Am Heart J. 2018 May;199:150-155. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.02.006. Epub 2018 Feb 11.
10
Clinically significant bleeding with low-dose rivaroxaban versus aspirin, in addition to P2Y12 inhibition, in acute coronary syndromes (GEMINI-ACS-1): a double-blind, multicentre, randomised trial.在急性冠脉综合征(GEMINI-ACS-1)中,与低剂量利伐沙班加 P2Y12 抑制相比,加用阿司匹林导致临床显著出血:一项双盲、多中心、随机试验。
Lancet. 2017 May 6;389(10081):1799-1808. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30751-1. Epub 2017 Mar 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Myocardial ischemia in nonobstructive coronary arteries: A review of diagnostic dilemmas, current perspectives, and emerging therapeutic innovations.非阻塞性冠状动脉疾病中的心肌缺血:诊断困境、当前观点及新兴治疗创新综述
World J Cardiol. 2025 May 26;17(5):106541. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v17.i5.106541.
2
Antithrombotic Therapy for Acute Coronary Syndrome.急性冠状动脉综合征的抗栓治疗
J Neuroendovasc Ther. 2025;19(1). doi: 10.5797/jnet.ra.2024-0102. Epub 2025 May 27.
3
Understanding Myocardial Infarction with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries (MINOCA): a comprehensive meta-analysis of clinical characteristics, management, and prognosis compared to MI with the Obstructive Coronary Artery (MIOCA).
理解非阻塞性冠状动脉心肌梗死(MINOCA):与阻塞性冠状动脉心肌梗死(MIOCA)相比,对临床特征、管理及预后的综合荟萃分析
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025 Mar 1;25(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12872-025-04504-2.
4
ANOCA, INOCA, MINOCA: The New Frontier of Coronary Syndromes.无症状性心肌缺血(ANOCA)、隐匿性心肌缺血(INOCA)、微血管性心绞痛(MINOCA):冠状动脉综合征的新前沿。
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2025 Feb 10;12(2):64. doi: 10.3390/jcdd12020064.
5
Pharmacogenomics revolutionizing cardiovascular therapeutics: A narrative review.药物基因组学对心血管治疗的变革:一篇综述
Health Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 20;7(10):e70139. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70139. eCollection 2024 Oct.
6
Acute Complications in Patients with Myocardial Infarction with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries: A Systematic Review with Special Focus on Mechanical Complications.非阻塞性冠状动脉心肌梗死患者的急性并发症:一项特别关注机械并发症的系统评价
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Dec 2;23(12):393. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2312393. eCollection 2022 Dec.
7
Long term all-cause mortality after myocardial infarction with non-obstructed vs obstructed coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of adjusted data.心肌梗死后非阻塞性与阻塞性冠状动脉疾病的长期全因死亡率:调整后数据的荟萃分析。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 Jan 2;24(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12872-023-03674-1.
8
Performance of Prognostic Scoring Systems in MINOCA: A Comparison among GRACE, TIMI, HEART, and ACEF Scores.心肌梗死伴非阻塞性冠状动脉病变(MINOCA)中预后评分系统的性能:全球急性冠状动脉事件注册研究(GRACE)、心肌梗死溶栓治疗(TIMI)、心肌梗死全球登记处(HEART)和急性冠状动脉事件全球注册欧洲分支(ACEF)评分的比较
J Clin Med. 2023 Aug 31;12(17):5687. doi: 10.3390/jcm12175687.
9
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy: A Concise Review for Clinicians.双联抗血小板治疗:给临床医生的简明综述
Life (Basel). 2023 Jul 18;13(7):1580. doi: 10.3390/life13071580.
10
The Comparison of Predicting Factors and Outcomes of MINOCA and STEMI Patients in the 5-Year Follow-Up.5年随访中MINOCA和STEMI患者预测因素及结局的比较
J Pers Med. 2023 May 19;13(5):856. doi: 10.3390/jpm13050856.