TALEN 在编辑异染色质靶位点方面优于 Cas9。
TALEN outperforms Cas9 in editing heterochromatin target sites.
机构信息
Department of Biochemistry, School of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA.
Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA.
出版信息
Nat Commun. 2021 Jan 27;12(1):606. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20672-5.
Genome editing critically relies on selective recognition of target sites. However, despite recent progress, the underlying search mechanism of genome-editing proteins is not fully understood in the context of cellular chromatin environments. Here, we use single-molecule imaging in live cells to directly study the behavior of CRISPR/Cas9 and TALEN. Our single-molecule imaging of genome-editing proteins reveals that Cas9 is less efficient in heterochromatin than TALEN because Cas9 becomes encumbered by local searches on non-specific sites in these regions. We find up to a fivefold increase in editing efficiency for TALEN compared to Cas9 in heterochromatin regions. Overall, our results show that Cas9 and TALEN use a combination of 3-D and local searches to identify target sites, and the nanoscopic granularity of local search determines the editing outcomes of the genome-editing proteins. Taken together, our results suggest that TALEN is a more efficient gene-editing tool than Cas9 for applications in heterochromatin.
基因组编辑严重依赖于对靶位点的选择性识别。然而,尽管最近取得了进展,但在细胞染色质环境的背景下,基因组编辑蛋白的潜在搜索机制仍未被完全理解。在这里,我们使用活细胞中的单分子成像来直接研究 CRISPR/Cas9 和 TALEN 的行为。我们对基因组编辑蛋白的单分子成像显示,Cas9 在异染色质中的效率低于 TALEN,因为 Cas9 在这些区域的非特异性位点上进行局部搜索时会受到阻碍。我们发现 TALEN 在异染色质区域的编辑效率比 Cas9 提高了多达五倍。总的来说,我们的结果表明,Cas9 和 TALEN 结合使用 3D 和局部搜索来识别靶位点,而局部搜索的纳米级粒度决定了基因组编辑蛋白的编辑结果。总之,我们的结果表明,TALEN 是一种比 Cas9 更有效的基因编辑工具,可用于异染色质中的应用。