Chow Eric P F, Hocking Jane S, Ong Jason J, Phillips Tiffany R, Fairley Christopher K
Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2020 Nov 2;8(1):ofaa536. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaa536. eCollection 2021 Jan.
We aimed to examine the impact of lockdown on sexually transmitted infection (STI) diagnoses and access to a public sexual health service during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in Melbourne, Australia.
The operating hours of Melbourne Sexual Health Centre (MSHC) remained the same during the lockdown. We examined the number of consultations and STIs at MSHC between January and June 2020 and stratified the data into prelockdown (February 3 to March 22), lockdown (March 23 to May 10), and postlockdown (May 11 to June 28), with 7 weeks in each period. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using Poisson regression models.
The total number of consultations dropped from 7818 in prelockdown to 4652 during lockdown (IRR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.57-0.62) but increased to 5347 in the postlockdown period (IRR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.11-1.20). There was a 68% reduction in asymptomatic screening during lockdown (IRR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.30-0.35), but it gradually increased during the postlockdown period (IRR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.46-1.74). Conditions with milder symptoms showed a marked reduction, including nongonococcal urethritis (IRR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.51-0.72) and candidiasis (IRR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.49-0.76), during lockdown compared with prelockdown. STIs with more marked symptoms did not change significantly, including pelvic inflammatory disease (IRR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.61-1.47) and infectious syphilis (IRR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.73-1.77). There was no significant change in STI diagnoses during postlockdown compared with lockdown.
The public appeared to be prioritizing their attendance for sexual health services based on the urgency of their clinical conditions. This suggests that the effectiveness of clinical services in detecting, treating, and preventing onward transmission of important symptomatic conditions is being mainly preserved despite large falls in absolute numbers of attendees.
我们旨在研究在澳大利亚墨尔本2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间,封锁措施对性传播感染(STI)诊断以及获得公共性健康服务的影响。
在封锁期间,墨尔本性健康中心(MSHC)的营业时间保持不变。我们调查了2020年1月至6月期间MSHC的咨询数量和性传播感染情况,并将数据分为封锁前(2月3日至3月22日)、封锁期间(3月23日至5月10日)和封锁后(5月11日至6月28日)三个阶段,每个阶段为7周。使用泊松回归模型估计发病率比(IRR)及其95%置信区间(CI)。
咨询总数从封锁前的7818例降至封锁期间的4652例(IRR,0.60;95%CI,0.57 - 0.62),但在封锁后阶段增加至5347例(IRR,1.15;95%CI,1.11 - 1.20)。封锁期间无症状筛查减少了68%(IRR,0.32;95%CI,0.30 - 0.35),但在封锁后阶段逐渐增加(IRR,1.59;95%CI,1.46 - 1.74)。与封锁前相比,症状较轻的疾病在封锁期间显著减少,包括非淋菌性尿道炎(IRR,0.60;95%CI,0.5:1 - 0.72)和念珠菌病(IRR,0.61;95%CI,0.49 - 0.76)。症状较明显的性传播感染没有显著变化,包括盆腔炎(IRR,0.95;95%CI,0.61 - 1.47)和传染性梅毒(IRR,1.14;95%CI,0.73 - 1.77)。与封锁期间相比,封锁后性传播感染诊断没有显著变化。
公众似乎根据临床状况的紧急程度来优先安排性健康服务就诊。这表明,尽管就诊人数绝对数量大幅下降,但临床服务在检测、治疗和预防重要症状性疾病的进一步传播方面的有效性基本得以保留。