Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy, and Economics (CHOICE) Institute, University of Washington, Seattle.
Allergan, Irvine, CA.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 Feb;27(2):223-239. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.2.223.
Nonadherence and nonpersistence to antidepressants in major depressive disorder (MDD) are common and associated with poor clinical and functional outcomes and increased health care resource utilization (HCRU) and costs. However, contemporary real-world evidence on the economic effect of antidepressant nonadherence and nonpersistence is limited. To assess the effect of nonadherence and nonpersistence to antidepressants on HCRU and costs in adult patients with MDD enrolled in U.S. commercial and Medicare supplemental insurance plans. This was a retrospective new-user cohort study using administrative claims data from the IBM MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental databases from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2018. We identified adult patients with MDD aged ≥ 18 years who initiated antidepressant therapy for a new MDD episode between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2017. Twelve-month total all-cause HCRU and costs (2019 U.S. dollars) were characterized for patients who were adherent/nonadherent and persistent/nonpersistent to antidepressants at 6 months. Adherence was defined as having proportion of days covered (PDC) ≥ 80%, and persistence was defined as having continuous antidepressant therapy without a ≥ 30-day gap. Multivariable negative binomial regression and 2-part models adjusted for baseline characteristics were used to estimate incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for HCRU and incremental costs of nonadherence and nonpersistence, respectively. A total of 224,645 patients with MDD (commercial: n = 209,422; Medicare supplemental: n = 15,223) met all study inclusion criteria. Approximately half of patients were nonadherent (commercial: 48%; Medicare supplemental: 50%) or nonpersistent (commercial: 49%; Medicare supplemental: 52%) to antidepressants at 6 months. After controlling for baseline characteristics, nonadherent patients experienced significantly more inpatient hospitalizations (commercial, adjusted IRR [95% CI]: 1.34 [1.29 to 1.39]; Medicare supplemental: 1.19 [1.12 to 1.28]) and emergency room (ER) visits (commercial, adjusted IRR [95% CI]: 1.43 [1.40 to 1.45]; Medicare supplemental: 1.28 [1.21 to 1.36]) compared with adherent patients. Similar results were observed in nonpersistent patients. Adjusted mean differences revealed that nonadherent and nonpersistent patients accumulated significantly higher medical costs (commercial: $568 [95% CI: $354 to $764] and $491 [$284 to $703]; Medicare supplemental: $1,621 [$314 to $2,774] and $1,764 [$451 to $2,925]), inpatient costs (commercial: $650 [$490 to $801] and $564 [$417 to $716]; Medicare supplemental: $1,546 [$705 to $2,308] and $1,567 [$778 to $2,331]), and ER costs (commercial: $130 [$115 to $143] and $129 [$115 to $142]; Medicare supplemental: $82 [$23 to $150] and $80 [$18 to $150]), and incurred significantly lower pharmacy costs (commercial: -$561 [-$601 to -$521] and -$576 [-$616 to -$540]; Medicare supplemental: -$510 [-$747 to -$227] and -$596 [-$830 to -$325]) compared with adherent and persistent patients, respectively. This study found more hospitalizations and ER use and higher total medical costs among patients who were nonadherent and nonpersistent to antidepressants at 6 months. Strategies that promote better adherence and persistence may lower HCRU and medical costs in patients with MDD. This study was sponsored by Allergan, which was involved in the study design; data collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; and decision to present these results. Ta was supported by a training grant provided to the University of Washington by Allergan at the time this study was conducted. Tung and Gillard are employees of Allergan. Oliveri is an employee of Genesis Research. Sullivan and Devine have no financial disclosures. This study was presented as a poster at AMCP 2020 (Virtual Meeting), April 21-24, 2020.
抗抑郁药治疗的不依从和不持续在重度抑郁症(MDD)中很常见,与临床和功能结局较差以及增加医疗保健资源利用(HCRU)和成本有关。然而,目前关于抗抑郁药不依从和不持续的经济影响的真实世界证据有限。
评估抗抑郁药不依从和不持续对美国商业和补充医疗保险计划中 MDD 成年患者的 HCRU 和成本的影响。
这是一项使用 IBM MarketScan 商业和补充医疗保险数据库从 2010 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 12 月 31 日的行政索赔数据进行的回顾性新用户队列研究。我们确定了年龄≥18 岁的患有 MDD 的成年患者,他们在 2011 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 12 月 31 日之间开始了新的 MDD 发作的抗抑郁治疗。在 6 个月时,我们描述了对抗抑郁药治疗依从性/不依从性和持续性/不持续性的患者的 12 个月总全因 HCRU 和成本(2019 年美元)。依从性定义为有比例的天数覆盖(PDC)≥80%,持续性定义为连续抗抑郁治疗而没有≥30 天的空白。使用多变量负二项回归和两部分模型,根据基线特征调整,分别估计不依从和不持续的 HCRU 和增量成本的发生率比(IRR)。
共有 224,645 名患有 MDD 的患者(商业:n=209,422;医疗保险补充:n=15,223)符合所有研究纳入标准。大约一半的患者在 6 个月时对抗抑郁药不依从(商业:48%;医疗保险补充:50%)或不持续(商业:49%;医疗保险补充:52%)。在控制了基线特征后,不依从的患者经历了更多的住院治疗(商业,调整后的 IRR[95%CI]:1.34[1.29 至 1.39];医疗保险补充:1.19[1.12 至 1.28])和急诊室(ER)就诊(商业,调整后的 IRR[95%CI]:1.43[1.40 至 1.45];医疗保险补充:1.28[1.21 至 1.36])与依从性患者相比。在不持续的患者中也观察到了类似的结果。调整后的平均差异显示,不依从和不持续的患者累计的医疗费用显著更高(商业:$568[95%CI:$354 至 $764]和$491[$284 至 $703];医疗保险补充:$1,621[$314 至 $2,774]和$1,764[$451 至 $2,925])、住院费用(商业:$650[$490 至 $801]和$564[$417 至 $716];医疗保险补充:$1,546[$705 至 $2,308]和$1,567[$778 至 $2,331])和 ER 费用(商业:$130[$115 至 $143]和$129[$115 至 $142];医疗保险补充:$82[$23 至 $150]和$80[$18 至 $150]),并且保险费用显著降低(商业:-$561[-$601 至 -$521]和-$576[-$616 至 -$540];医疗保险补充:-$510[-$747 至 -$227]和-$596[-$830 至 -$325])与依从性和持续性患者相比,分别。
这项研究发现,在 6 个月时,抗抑郁药不依从和不持续的患者的住院和 ER 使用更多,总医疗费用更高。促进更好的依从性和持续性的策略可能会降低 MDD 患者的 HCRU 和医疗成本。
这项研究由 Allergan 赞助,Allergan 参与了研究设计;数据收集、分析和解释;以及提出这些结果的决定。Ta 得到了 Allergan 在进行这项研究时提供给华盛顿大学的培训补助金的支持。Tung 和 Gillard 是 Allergan 的员工。Oliveri 是 Genesis Research 的员工。Sullivan 和 Devine 没有财务披露。这项研究作为海报在 AMCP 2020(虚拟会议)上展示,2020 年 4 月 21 日至 24 日。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2022-12
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020-1
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017-3
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2022-11
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2023-6-22
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2021-12-16
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018-3
JAMA Psychiatry. 2017-11-1
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2017-6