Schreiner C E, Urbas J V
Max-Planck-Institut für biophysikalische Chemie, Abteilung Neurobiologie, Göttingen, F.R.G.
Hear Res. 1988 Jan;32(1):49-63. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(88)90146-3.
The responses of neuronal clusters to amplitude-modulated tones were studied in five auditory cortical fields of the anesthetized cat: the primary auditory field (AI), second auditory field (AII), anterior auditory field (AAF), posterior auditory field (PAF) and the ventro-posterior auditory field (VPAF). Modulation transfer functions (MTFs) for amplitude-modulated tones were obtained at 172 cortical locations. MTFs were constructed by measuring firing rate (rate-MTFs) and response synchronization (synchronization-MTFs) to sinusoidal and rectangular waveform modulation of CF-tones. The MTFs were characterized by their 'best-modulation frequency' (BMF) and a measure of their quality of 'sharpness' (Q2dB). These characteristics were compared for the five fields. Rate and synchronization MTFs for sinusoidal and rectangular modulation produced similar estimates of BMF and Q2dB. Comparison of averaged BMFs between the cortical fields revealed relatively high BMFs in AAF (mean: 31.1 Hz for synchronization to sinusoidal AM) and moderately high BMFs in AI (14.2 Hz) whereas BMFs encountered in AII, VPAF and PAF were generally low (7.0, 5.2, and 6.8 Hz). The MTFs were relatively broadly tuned (low Q2dB) in AAF and sharper in a low modulation group containing AII, PAF and VPAF. The ventro-posterior field was the most sensitive to changes in the modulation waveform. We conclude that there are significant differences between auditory cortical fields with respect to their temporal response characteristics and that the assessment of these response characteristics reveals important aspects of the functional significance of auditory cortical fields for the coding and representation of complex sounds.
初级听觉区(AI)、第二听觉区(AII)、前听觉区(AAF)、后听觉区(PAF)和腹后听觉区(VPAF)。在172个皮层位置获得了调幅音的调制传递函数(MTF)。通过测量对CF音的正弦和矩形波形调制的放电率(率-MTF)和反应同步性(同步-MTF)来构建MTF。MTF的特征在于其“最佳调制频率”(BMF)和“锐度”质量度量(Q2dB)。比较了这五个区域的这些特征。正弦和矩形调制的率和同步MTF产生了相似的BMF和Q2dB估计值。皮层区域之间平均BMF的比较显示,AAF中的BMF相对较高(正弦调幅同步时平均为31.1Hz),AI中的BMF中等偏高(14.2Hz),而AII、VPAF和PAF中的BMF通常较低(7.0、5.2和6.8Hz)。AAF中的MTF调谐相对较宽(Q2dB低),而在包含AII、PAF和VPAF的低调制组中更尖锐。腹后区对调制波形的变化最敏感。我们得出结论,听觉皮层区域在其时间反应特征方面存在显著差异,并且对这些反应特征的评估揭示了听觉皮层区域在复杂声音编码和表征方面功能意义的重要方面。