Yoon Dahlnym, Mokros Andreas, Rettenberger Martin, Briken Peer, Brunner Franziska
Faculty of Psychology, FernUniversität in Hagen (University of Hagen).
Centre for Criminology.
Personal Disord. 2022 Jan;13(1):52-63. doi: 10.1037/per0000478. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
The standard measure of assessment of psychopathy in forensic and correctional settings is the Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R), an observer-rating instrument assessing 4 facets of psychopathy: Interpersonal, Affective, Lifestyle, and Antisocial. The relatively new triarchic model of psychopathy, in contrast, consists of 3 factors: Boldness, Meanness, and Disinhibition measured with a self-report questionnaire, Triarchic Psychopathy Measure (TriPM). The evidence for the utility of the TriPM questionnaire in forensic or correctional settings is still scarce. Therefore, the current study was conducted to examine the convergence of the TriPM questionnaire with the PCL-R and interpersonal psychopathic behavior ratings based on the Interpersonal Measure of Psychopathy in a sample of German adult male prison inmates undergoing a correctional treatment (N = 152). To test the construct validity with external criteria, measures for impulsiveness and self-efficacy were used. Overall, the results were rather equivocal regarding the validity of the TriPM. The TriPM Boldness scale was not significantly correlated with the PCL-R but only with the Interpersonal Measure of Psychopathy Grandiosity and Self-Efficacy. The TriPM Meanness scale and Disinhibition were strongly correlated and showed a similar correlative pattern with the PCL-R Lifestyle and Antisocial facets. Thus, the construct coverage of the TriPM and the added value for measuring psychopathic traits using the TriPM in correctional settings remains inconclusive. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
在法医和教养环境中,评估心理opathy的标准方法是《哈雷心理opathy清单修订版》(PCL-R),这是一种观察者评分工具,用于评估心理opathy的四个方面:人际、情感、生活方式和反社会。相比之下,相对较新的心理opathy三元模型由三个因素组成:大胆、卑鄙和抑制解除,通过自我报告问卷《三元心理opathy量表》(TriPM)进行测量。TriPM问卷在法医或教养环境中的效用证据仍然很少。因此,本研究旨在检验TriPM问卷与PCL-R以及基于德国成年男性监狱囚犯样本(N = 152)的人际心理opathy测量的人际心理opathic行为评分之间的收敛性。为了用外部标准检验结构效度,使用了冲动性和自我效能感的测量方法。总体而言,关于TriPM的效度,结果相当模棱两可。TriPM大胆量表与PCL-R没有显著相关性,但仅与人际心理opathy的夸大和自我效能感测量相关。TriPM卑鄙量表和抑制解除量表高度相关,并且与PCL-R生活方式和反社会方面呈现出相似的相关模式。因此,TriPM的结构覆盖范围以及在教养环境中使用TriPM测量心理opathic特征的附加值仍然没有定论。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2022美国心理学会,保留所有权利)