Suppr超能文献

颈动脉超声检查发现狭窄的患者在影像学监测和医学管理方面的依从性不足。

Inadequate Adherence to Imaging Surveillance and Medical Management in Patients with Duplex Ultrasound-Detected Carotid Artery Stenosis.

机构信息

Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston MA.

Evans Department of Medicine and Whitaker Cardiovascular Institute, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA.

出版信息

Ann Vasc Surg. 2021 Jul;74:63-72. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.12.027. Epub 2021 Jan 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

It is recommended that patients with ≥50% carotid artery stenosis undergo surveillance imaging and atherosclerotic risk reduction medical therapies, regardless of whether revascularization is performed. The objective of this study was to determine rates of adherence to these recommended measures and to identify risk factors for nonadherence.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed of all carotid duplex ultrasound (DUS) from 2016 to 2017 at a single institution. Patients with unilateral or bilateral ≥50% carotid stenosis were included. Primary outcomes were rates and timing of surveillance imaging and medication regimen. Patient and study characteristics were compared using univariate and multivariable analyses. A subgroup analysis of patients with a new finding of carotid stenosis was also performed.

RESULTS

Carotid stenosis >50% was detected in 340 patients. Overall, 182 patients (54%) had follow-up imaging (median 261 days [IQR 166-366]) and 158 patients (46%) had no imaging follow-up (NIFU). NIFU patients had similar rates of aspirin use (86% vs. 88%, P = 0.6) and tobacco cessation counseling (71% vs. 71%, P = 0.8) but had less statin use (85% vs. 94%, P = 0.01) compared to those with imaging follow-up. Subsequent carotid revascularization was more common in patients with imaging follow-up (18% vs. 3%, P < 0.001). NIFU patients were less likely to have Medicare or commercial insurance (54% vs. 75%, P < 0.001). The indication for DUS in NIFU patients, compared to those in follow up, was less commonly neurologic symptoms (11% vs. 14%), more commonly other clinical findings (35% vs. 16%), and more commonly as work up before nonvascular surgery (25% vs. 4%, P < 0.001), respectively. NIFU rates decreased with increasing degree of carotid stenosis. Prior carotid intervention, prior DUS, or DUS ordered by a vascular surgeon were characteristics associated with imaging follow-up (P < 0.05 for all). In a subgroup of 160 patients with new carotid stenosis, a majority (64%) had NIFU and statin use was lower in these patients (82% vs. 96%, P = 0.007). On multivariable analysis, preop indication was predictive of NIFU (odds ratio [OR] 8.1 [95% confidence interval, CI 2.5-26.4], P < 0.001) whereas protective factors included: 70-80% stenosis (OR 0.33 [95% CI 0.14-0.76], P = 0.01), study ordered by vascular surgeon (OR 0.40 [95% CI 0.19-0.83], P = 0.01), and Medicare/commercial insurance (OR 0.36 [95% CI 0.2-0.66], P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly half of patients found to have ≥50% carotid stenosis on DUS had no imaging follow-up; these patients were less likely to be on recommended statin therapy. The benefits of nonrevascularization-based treatments for carotid disease require adherence to therapy. Forgoing surveillance imaging in patients with hemodynamically significant carotid stenosis should be a shared decision between provider and patient and does not obviate the need for medical therapies.

摘要

背景

建议≥50%颈动脉狭窄的患者进行监测影像学检查和动脉粥样硬化风险降低的药物治疗,无论是否进行血运重建。本研究的目的是确定这些建议措施的依从率,并确定不依从的危险因素。

方法

对 2016 年至 2017 年在一家机构进行的所有颈动脉双功能超声(DUS)进行回顾性分析。纳入单侧或双侧≥50%颈动脉狭窄的患者。主要结局是监测影像学和药物治疗方案的发生率和时间。使用单变量和多变量分析比较患者和研究特征。还对新发现颈动脉狭窄的患者进行了亚组分析。

结果

340 例患者发现颈动脉狭窄>50%。总体而言,182 例(54%)患者进行了随访影像学检查(中位数 261 天[IQR 166-366]),158 例(46%)患者未进行影像学随访(无影像学随访[NIFU])。NIFU 患者的阿司匹林使用率(86%比 88%,P=0.6)和戒烟咨询率(71%比 71%,P=0.8)相似,但他汀类药物使用率较低(85%比 94%,P=0.01)与有影像学随访的患者相比。有影像学随访的患者随后进行颈动脉血运重建更为常见(18%比 3%,P<0.001)。NIFU 患者更不可能拥有医疗保险或商业保险(54%比 75%,P<0.001)。与有随访的患者相比,NIFU 患者的 DUS 指征更常见为非神经症状(11%比 14%)、更常见其他临床发现(35%比 16%)、更常见作为非血管手术前的检查(25%比 4%,P<0.001)。NIFU 发生率随颈动脉狭窄程度的增加而降低。先前的颈动脉介入治疗、先前的 DUS 或由血管外科医生开具的 DUS 是与影像学随访相关的特征(所有 P<0.05)。在 160 例新发现颈动脉狭窄的患者亚组中,大多数(64%)患者存在 NIFU,这些患者的他汀类药物使用率较低(82%比 96%,P=0.007)。多变量分析显示,术前指征是 NIFU 的预测因素(比值比[OR]8.1[95%置信区间,CI 2.5-26.4],P<0.001),而保护因素包括:70%-80%狭窄(OR 0.33[95%CI 0.14-0.76],P=0.01)、血管外科医生开具的研究(OR 0.40[95%CI 0.19-0.83],P=0.01)和医疗保险/商业保险(OR 0.36[95%CI 0.2-0.66],P=0.001)。

结论

在 DUS 上发现≥50%颈动脉狭窄的患者中,近一半没有进行影像学随访;这些患者更不可能接受推荐的他汀类药物治疗。颈动脉疾病的非血运重建治疗的获益需要坚持治疗。对于有血流动力学意义的颈动脉狭窄患者,如果不进行监测影像学检查,应该是在提供者和患者之间进行的共同决策,并且不能免除药物治疗的需要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验