Suppr超能文献

商业管理式医疗组织对处方药的影响。

Impact of a commercial accountable care organization on prescription drugs.

机构信息

Health Policy Research Division, California Public Employees' Retirement System, Sacramento, California, USA.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2021 Aug;56(4):592-603. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13626. Epub 2021 Jan 28.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the long-run impact of a commercial accountable care organization (ACO) on prescription drug spending, utilization, and related quality of care.

DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS) health maintenance organization (HMO) member enrollment data and pharmacy benefit claims, including both retail and mail-order generic and brand-name prescription drugs.

STUDY DESIGN

We applied a longitudinal retrospective cohort study design and propensity-weighted difference-in-differences regression models. We examined the relative changes in outcome measures between two ACO cohorts and one non-ACO cohort before and after the ACO implementation in 2010. The ACO directed provider prescribing patterns toward generic substitution for brand-name prescription drugs to maximize shared savings in pharmacy spending.

DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: The study sample included members continuously enrolled in a CalPERS commercial HMO from 2008 through 2014 in the Sacramento area.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

The cohort differences in baseline characteristics of 40 483 study participants were insignificant after propensity-weighting adjustment. The ACO enrollees had no significant differential changes in either all or most of the five years of the ACO operation for the following measures: (1) average total spending and (2) average total scripts filled and days supplied on either generic or brand-name prescription drugs, or the two combined; (3) average generic shares of total prescription drug spending, scripts filled or days supplied; (4) annual rates of 10 outpatient process quality of care metrics for medication prescribing or adherence.

CONCLUSIONS

Participation in the commercial ACO was associated with negligible differential changes in prescription drug spending, utilization, and related quality of care measures. Capped financial risk-sharing and increased generics substitution for brand names are not enough to produce tangible performance improvement in ACOs. Measures to increase provider financial risk-sharing shares and lower brand-name drug prices are needed.

摘要

目的

确定商业管理式医疗组织(ACO)对处方药支出、使用和相关医疗质量的长期影响。

数据来源/研究范围:加利福尼亚州公务员退休系统(CalPERS)健康维护组织(HMO)成员登记数据和药房福利索赔,包括零售和邮购的通用名和品牌名处方药。

研究设计

我们采用纵向回顾性队列研究设计和倾向评分差异中的差异回归模型。我们检查了在 2010 年实施 ACO 前后,两个 ACO 队列和一个非 ACO 队列的结果指标的相对变化。ACO 引导提供者将处方模式转向品牌名处方药的通用替代,以最大限度地节省药房支出的共享储蓄。

数据收集/提取方法:研究样本包括 2008 年至 2014 年期间连续参加加利福尼亚州公务员退休系统商业 HMO 的萨克拉门托地区的成员。

主要发现

在倾向评分调整后,40483 名研究参与者的基线特征的队列差异不显著。在 ACO 运行的五年内,ACO 参与者在以下所有或大多数措施中没有出现显著的差异变化:(1)平均总支出,(2)平均总处方和(3)平均通用名处方药物支出、处方或供应天数;(3)平均通用名处方药支出、处方或供应天数的总处方药物支出、处方或供应天数的份额;(4)每年 10 项门诊药物处方或遵从质量护理指标的比率。

结论

参与商业 ACO 与处方药支出、使用和相关医疗质量措施的差异变化无关。有上限的财务风险分担和增加通用名药物替代品牌名药物的使用不足以在 ACO 中产生显著的绩效改善。需要采取措施增加提供者的财务风险分担份额和降低品牌名药物的价格。

相似文献

1
Impact of a commercial accountable care organization on prescription drugs.
Health Serv Res. 2021 Aug;56(4):592-603. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13626. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
3
Role of pharmacy services in accountable care organizations.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2015 Apr;21(4):338-44. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2015.21.4.338.
5
Savings or Selection? Initial Spending Reductions in the Medicare Shared Savings Program and Considerations for Reform.
Milbank Q. 2020 Sep;98(3):847-907. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12468. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
7
Optimization of Medication Use at Accountable Care Organizations.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Oct;23(10):1054-1064. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.10.1054.
9
Generic script share and the price of brand-name drugs: the role of consumer choice.
Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2009 Sep;9(3):291-316. doi: 10.1007/s10754-008-9052-0. Epub 2009 Jan 8.
10
Effects of a consumer driven health plan on pharmaceutical spending and utilization.
Health Serv Res. 2008 Oct;43(5 Pt 1):1542-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2008.00857.x. Epub 2008 May 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Association of Participation in a Value-Based Insurance Design Program With Health Care Spending and Utilization.
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Mar 1;6(3):e232666. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.2666.
3
The Effect of Network-Level Payment Models on Care Network Performance: A Scoping Review of the Empirical Literature.
Int J Integr Care. 2022 Apr 1;22(2):3. doi: 10.5334/ijic.6002. eCollection 2022 Apr-Jun.
4
Taking account of accountable care.
Health Serv Res. 2021 Aug;56(4):573-577. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13689. Epub 2021 Jun 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Are ACOs Ready to be Accountable for Medication Use?
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 Nov;26(11):1446-1451. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.11.1446.
3
Changes in List Prices, Net Prices, and Discounts for Branded Drugs in the US, 2007-2018.
JAMA. 2020 Mar 3;323(9):854-862. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.1012.
4
Rebates-The Little-Known Factor Behind Increasing Drug List Prices.
JAMA. 2020 Mar 3;323(9):812-813. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.1208.
5
Relentless Prescription Drug Price Increases.
JAMA. 2020 Mar 3;323(9):826-828. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.0359.
6
Are Pharmaceutical Companies Earning Too Much?
JAMA. 2020 Mar 3;323(9):829-830. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.0351.
7
Physician and Patient Adjustment to Reference Pricing for Drugs.
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Feb 5;3(2):e1920544. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.20544.
8
FDA Approval and Regulation of Pharmaceuticals, 1983-2018.
JAMA. 2020 Jan 14;323(2):164-176. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.20288.
9
Advancing Legislation on Drug Pricing - Is There a Path Forward?
N Engl J Med. 2019 Nov 28;381(22):2081-2084. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1914044.
10
The U.S. Insulin Crisis - Rationing a Lifesaving Medication Discovered in the 1920s.
N Engl J Med. 2019 Nov 7;381(19):1793-1795. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1909402.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验