Suppr超能文献

在 COVID-19 时代的质量调整生命年。

Quality adjusted life years in the time of COVID-19.

机构信息

Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, NSW, Australia. Email:

出版信息

Aust Health Rev. 2021 Feb;45(1):12-13. doi: 10.1071/AH21010.

Abstract

The quality adjusted life year (QALY) as a basis of valuing additional expenditure on health is widely accepted. Although early in the COVID-19 pandemic, several commentators called for a similar approach in resolving trade-offs between economic activity and reducing the burden of COVID-19, this has not occurred. The value of a QALY has not been used to deny all intervention, as the rule of rescue attests. Further, while there was no other way of managing the pandemic, there were other means available to mitigate the economic losses. Now that vaccine programs have commenced in several countries, it is interesting to consider whether economic evaluation should now be applied. However, the recognised complexities of the evaluation of vaccines, plus the challenge of measuring opportunity costs in the face of an economic recession and the severity of the consequences of an outbreak even though the probability of transmission is exceedingly low, mean its use will be restricted. COVID-19 has changed everything, even the way we should think about economic evaluation.

摘要

质量调整生命年(QALY)作为评估卫生额外支出的基础已被广泛接受。尽管在 COVID-19 大流行早期,就有几位评论家呼吁在经济活动与降低 COVID-19 负担之间的权衡取舍中采取类似的方法,但这种情况并未发生。正如救生原则所证明的那样,并没有使用 QALY 来否定所有的干预措施。此外,虽然没有其他方法可以管理大流行,但还有其他手段可以减轻经济损失。现在,一些国家已经开始实施疫苗接种计划,现在有趣的是要考虑是否应该进行经济评估。但是,疫苗评估的公认复杂性,加上在经济衰退和大流行后果的严重性(即使传播的概率极低)面前衡量机会成本的挑战,意味着其使用将受到限制。COVID-19 改变了一切,甚至包括我们应该如何思考经济评估的方式。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验