Suppr超能文献

[限制性液体管理对重度创伤性脑损伤患者的临床疗效]

[Clinical efficacy of restrictive fluid management in patients with severe traumatic brain injury].

作者信息

Zhao Shibing, Xu Decai, Li Rui, Zou Qi, Chen Zhenzhen, Wang Huaxue, He Xiandi

机构信息

Department of Critical Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu 233004, China.

Department of Neurosurgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu 233004, China.

出版信息

Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2021 Jan 30;41(1):111-115. doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2021.01.16.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effects of restrictive fluid management in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI).

METHODS

Between January, 2019 and June, 2020, we randomly assigned 51 postoperative patients (stay in the ICU of no less than 7 days) with sTBI into treatment group (=25) with restrictive fluid management and the control group (=26) with conventional fluid management. The data of optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD), middle cerebral artery pulsatility index (MAC- PI), neuron-specific enolase (NSE) level, inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter, Glascow Coma Scale (GCS) score, mean arterial blood pressure, heart rate, and fluid balance of the patients were collected at ICU admission and at 1, 3 and 7 days after ICU admission, and the duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU stay, and 28-day mortality were recorded.

RESULTS

The cumulative fluid balance of the two groups were positive on day 1 and negative on days 3 and 7 after ICU admission; at the same time points, the patients in the treatment group had significantly greater negative fluid balance than those in the control group ( < 0.05). In both of the groups, the ONSD and MCA-PI values were significantly higher on day 1 than the baseline ( < 0.05), reached the peak levels on day 3, and decreased on day 7; at the same time point, these values were significantly lower in the treatment group than in the control group ( < 0.05). No significant difference was found in NSE level on day 1 between the two groups (>0.05); on day 3, NSE level reached the peak level and was significantly higher in the control group ( < 0.05); on day 7, NSE level was lowered the level of day 1 in the treatment group but remained higher than day 1 level in the control group. The 28-day mortality rate did not differ significantly between the two groups (16.00% 23.08%, >0.05); the duration of mechanical ventilation, length of ICU stay, and the number of tracheotomy were all significantly shorter or lower in the treatment group than in the control group ( < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Restrictive fluid management can reduce cerebral edema and improve the prognosis but does not affect the 28-day mortality of patients with sTBI.

摘要

目的

探讨限制性液体管理对重型颅脑损伤(sTBI)患者的影响。

方法

2019年1月至2020年6月,我们将51例术后sTBI患者(在重症监护病房[ICU]停留不少于7天)随机分为采用限制性液体管理的治疗组(n = 25)和采用传统液体管理的对照组(n = 26)。在患者入住ICU时以及入住ICU后1、3和7天收集患者的视神经鞘直径(ONSD)、大脑中动脉搏动指数(MAC-PI)、神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)水平、下腔静脉(IVC)直径、格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分、平均动脉血压、心率和液体平衡数据,并记录机械通气时间、ICU停留时间和28天死亡率。

结果

两组患者入住ICU后第1天的累积液体平衡为正,第3天和第7天为负;在相同时间点,治疗组患者的负液体平衡明显大于对照组(P < 0.05)。两组患者第1天的ONSD和MCA-PI值均显著高于基线水平(P < 0.05),在第3天达到峰值水平,第7天下降;在相同时间点,治疗组的这些值明显低于对照组(P < 0.05)。两组患者第1天的NSE水平无显著差异(P > 0.05);第3天,NSE水平达到峰值,且对照组显著更高(P < 0.05);第7天,治疗组的NSE水平低于第1天,但仍高于对照组第1天的水平。两组患者的28天死亡率无显著差异(16.00%对23.08%,P > 0.05);治疗组的机械通气时间、ICU停留时间和气管切开次数均显著短于或少于对照组(P < 0.05)。

结论

限制性液体管理可减轻脑水肿并改善预后,但不影响sTBI患者的28天死亡率。

相似文献

1
[Clinical efficacy of restrictive fluid management in patients with severe traumatic brain injury].
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2021 Jan 30;41(1):111-115. doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2021.01.16.
5
Predictive factors for cerebrocardiac syndrome in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a retrospective cohort study.
Front Neurol. 2023 Jul 19;14:1192756. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1192756. eCollection 2023.
6
[Clinical observation on application of different enteral nutrition preparations in patients with severe traumatic brain injury].
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2019 Feb;31(2):209-213. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2019.02.017.
8
[Effect of early mechanical ventilation on the expression of inflammatory factors and prognosis in patients with severe traumatic brain injury].
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2021 Jun;33(6):727-730. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20210111-00046.
9
[The impact of early restrictive positive fluid balance strategy on the prognosis of patients with severe trauma].
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2013 Jan;25(1):36-9. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2013.01.010.

本文引用的文献

1
Lactic acid, neuron-specific enolase, and blood-brain barrier index after a severe traumatic brain injury: a prospective study.
Br J Neurosurg. 2024 Apr;38(2):220-224. doi: 10.1080/02688697.2020.1823938. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
2
Serum Concentrations of Neuron-Specific Enolase in Dogs Following Traumatic Brain Injury.
J Comp Pathol. 2020 Aug;179:45-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jcpa.2020.06.011. Epub 2020 Aug 15.
3
[Study of multimodal monitoring in neurocritical care patients].
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2020 Aug;32(8):960-964. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20200130-00148.
4
Multimodal non-invasive assessment of intracranial hypertension: an observational study.
Crit Care. 2020 Jun 26;24(1):379. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03105-z.
6
Review of non-invasive intracranial pressure measurement techniques for ophthalmology applications.
Br J Ophthalmol. 2020 Jul;104(7):887-892. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-314704. Epub 2019 Nov 8.
7
Liberal versus restrictive fluid therapy in critically ill patients.
Intensive Care Med. 2019 Oct;45(10):1440-1442. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05713-y. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
10
[Effects of different target blood pressure resuscitation on peripheral blood inflammatory factors and hemodynamics in patients with traumatic hemorrhagic shock].
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2019 Apr;31(4):428-433. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2019.04.011.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验