Suppr超能文献

德国专门针对晚期疾病患者的呼吸困难服务的效果:一项实用的快速通道随机对照试验(BreathEase)。

Effectiveness of a specialised breathlessness service for patients with advanced disease in Germany: a pragmatic fast-track randomised controlled trial (BreathEase).

机构信息

Dept of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany

Pettenkofer School of Public Health, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Eur Respir J. 2021 Aug 26;58(2). doi: 10.1183/13993003.02139-2020. Print 2021 Aug.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of the Munich Breathlessness Service (MBS), integrating palliative care, respiratory medicine and physiotherapy, was tested in the BreathEase trial in patients with chronic breathlessness in advanced disease and their carers.

METHODS

BreathEase was a single-blinded randomised controlled fast-track trial. The MBS was attended for 5-6 weeks; the control group started the MBS after 8 weeks of standard care. Randomisation was stratified by cancer and the presence of a carer. Primary outcomes were patients' mastery of breathlessness (Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire (CRQ) Mastery), quality of life (CRQ QoL), symptom burden (Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS)) and carer burden (Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI)). Intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses were conducted with hierarchical testing. Effectiveness was investigated by linear regression on change scores, adjusting for baseline scores and stratification variables. Missing values were handled with multiple imputation.

RESULTS

92 patients were randomised to the intervention group and 91 patients were randomised to the control group. Before the follow-up assessment after 8 weeks (T1), 17 and five patients dropped out from the intervention and control groups, respectively. Significant improvements in CRQ Mastery of 0.367 (95% CI 0.065-0.669) and CRQ QoL of 0.226 (95% CI 0.012-0.440) score units at T1 in favour of the intervention group were seen in the ITT analyses (n=183), but not in IPOS. Exploratory testing showed nonsignificant improvements in ZBI.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings demonstrate positive effects of the MBS in reducing burden caused by chronic breathlessness in advanced illness across a wide range of patients. Further evaluation in subgroups of patients and with a longitudinal perspective is needed.

摘要

背景

慕尼黑呼吸困难服务(MBS)将姑息治疗、呼吸医学和物理疗法相结合,在慢性疾病晚期呼吸困难患者及其护理者的 BreathEase 试验中进行了有效性测试。

方法

BreathEase 是一项单盲随机对照快速通道试验。MBS 治疗 5-6 周;对照组在标准护理 8 周后开始 MBS。随机分组采用癌症和护理者的存在进行分层。主要结局是患者对呼吸困难的掌握程度(慢性呼吸系统疾病问卷(CRQ)掌握度)、生活质量(CRQ 生活质量)、症状负担(综合姑息治疗结局量表(IPOS))和护理者负担(Zarit 负担访谈(ZBI))。意向治疗(ITT)分析采用分层检验进行。采用线性回归对变化评分进行有效性研究,调整基线评分和分层变量。使用多重插补处理缺失值。

结果

92 例患者被随机分配到干预组,91 例患者被随机分配到对照组。在 8 周后的随访评估(T1)前,干预组和对照组分别有 17 例和 5 例患者退出。意向治疗(ITT)分析(n=183)显示,干预组在 CRQ 掌握度上有显著改善,为 0.367(95% CI 0.065-0.669),在 CRQ 生活质量上有显著改善,为 0.226(95% CI 0.012-0.440),但在 IPOS 上没有显著改善。探索性检验显示 ZBI 有改善但不显著。

结论

这些发现表明,MBS 对减轻晚期慢性呼吸困难患者的负担有积极作用,适用于广泛的患者。需要在患者亚组和纵向角度进行进一步评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验