• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项针对多学科呼吸困难支持服务试点的混合方法评估。

A Mixed Methods Evaluation of a Pilot Multidisciplinary Breathlessness Support Service.

机构信息

School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

School of Nursing, Psychotherapy and Community Health, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Eval Rev. 2023 Oct;47(5):820-870. doi: 10.1177/0193841X231162402. Epub 2023 Apr 4.

DOI:10.1177/0193841X231162402
PMID:37014066
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10492442/
Abstract

Breathlessness support services have demonstrated benefits for breathlessness mastery, quality of life and psychosocial outcomes for people living with breathlessness. However, these services have predominantly been implemented in hospital and home care contexts. This study aims to evaluate the adaptation and implementation of a hospice-based outpatient Multidisciplinary Breathlessness Support Service (MBSS) in Ireland. A sequential explanatory mixed methods design guided this study. People with chronic breathlessness participated in longitudinal questionnaires ( = 10), medical record audit ( = 14) and a post-discharge interview ( = 8). Caregivers ( = 1) and healthcare professionals involved in referral to ( = 2) and delivery of ( = 3) the MBSS participated in a cross-sectional interview. Quantitative and qualitative data were integrated deductively via the pillar integration process, guided by the RE-AIM framework. Integration of mixed methods data enhanced understanding of factors influencing the reach, adoption, implementation and maintenance of the MBSS, and the potential outcomes that were most meaningful for service users. Potential threats to the sustainability of the MBSS related to potential preconceptions of hospice care, the lack of standardized discharge pathways from the service and access to primary care services to sustain pharmacological interventions. This study suggests that an adapted multidisciplinary breathlessness support intervention is feasible and acceptable in a hospice context. However, to ensure optimal reach and maintenance of the intervention, activities are required to ensure that misconceptions about the setting do not influence willingness to accept referral to MBSS services and integration of services is needed to enable consistency in referral and discharge processes.

摘要

呼吸困难支持服务已被证明对呼吸困难控制、生活质量和呼吸困难患者的心理社会结局有益。然而,这些服务主要在医院和家庭护理环境中实施。本研究旨在评估基于临终关怀的门诊多学科呼吸困难支持服务(MBSS)在爱尔兰的适应性和实施情况。一项顺序解释性混合方法设计指导了这项研究。慢性呼吸困难患者参与了纵向问卷调查(=10)、病历审核(=14)和出院后访谈(=8)。参与转诊(=2)和提供(=3)MBSS 的护理人员(=1)和医疗保健专业人员进行了横断面访谈。通过柱集成过程,根据 RE-AIM 框架,对定量和定性数据进行了演绎式整合。混合方法数据的整合增强了对影响 MBSS 的可及性、采用、实施和维持的因素以及对服务使用者最有意义的潜在结果的理解。与临终关怀护理的潜在偏见、缺乏从服务中标准化出院途径以及获得维持药物干预的初级保健服务相关的可持续性威胁。本研究表明,在临终关怀环境中,适应的多学科呼吸困难支持干预是可行且可接受的。然而,为了确保干预措施的最佳可及性和维持,需要开展活动,以确保对环境的误解不会影响接受 MBSS 服务转诊的意愿,并需要整合服务,以确保转诊和出院流程的一致性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c43e/10492442/3b2f35a8ff28/10.1177_0193841X231162402-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c43e/10492442/de36d5a82d89/10.1177_0193841X231162402-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c43e/10492442/697e9247dc49/10.1177_0193841X231162402-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c43e/10492442/0635f7c81001/10.1177_0193841X231162402-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c43e/10492442/3b2f35a8ff28/10.1177_0193841X231162402-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c43e/10492442/de36d5a82d89/10.1177_0193841X231162402-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c43e/10492442/697e9247dc49/10.1177_0193841X231162402-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c43e/10492442/0635f7c81001/10.1177_0193841X231162402-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c43e/10492442/3b2f35a8ff28/10.1177_0193841X231162402-fig4.jpg

相似文献

1
A Mixed Methods Evaluation of a Pilot Multidisciplinary Breathlessness Support Service.一项针对多学科呼吸困难支持服务试点的混合方法评估。
Eval Rev. 2023 Oct;47(5):820-870. doi: 10.1177/0193841X231162402. Epub 2023 Apr 4.
2
How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?“护理路径技术”对卒中护理服务整合的影响是如何衡量的,以及有哪些证据支持其在这方面的有效性?
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Mar;6(1):78-110. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2007.00098.x.
3
Development, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a new out-patient Breathlessness Support Service: study protocol of a phase III fast-track randomised controlled trial.新门诊呼吸困难支持服务的开发、效果和成本效益:一项 III 期快速通道随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Pulm Med. 2012 Sep 19;12:58. doi: 10.1186/1471-2466-12-58.
4
Improving the waiting times within a hospice breathlessness service.改善临终关怀机构呼吸急促服务的候诊时间。
BMJ Open Qual. 2019 May 29;8(2):e000582. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000582. eCollection 2019.
5
An integrated palliative and respiratory care service for patients with advanced disease and refractory breathlessness: a randomised controlled trial.晚期疾病和难治性呼吸困难患者的姑息和呼吸治疗综合服务:一项随机对照试验。
Lancet Respir Med. 2014 Dec;2(12):979-87. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(14)70226-7. Epub 2014 Oct 29.
6
Filling the Gap: A Feasibility Study of a COPD-Specific Breathlessness Service.填补空白:COPD 特异性呼吸困难服务的可行性研究。
COPD. 2022;19(1):324-329. doi: 10.1080/15412555.2022.2099821.
7
Breathlessness during daily activity: The psychometric properties of the London Chest Activity of Daily Living Scale in patients with advanced disease and refractory breathlessness.日常活动时呼吸困难:伦敦胸部日常生活活动量表在晚期疾病和难治性呼吸困难患者中的心理测量特性。
Palliat Med. 2017 Oct;31(9):868-875. doi: 10.1177/0269216316680314. Epub 2016 Dec 15.
8
Implementing the battery-operated hand-held fan as an evidence-based, non-pharmacological intervention for chronic breathlessness in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): a qualitative study of the views of specialist respiratory clinicians.将带电池的手持风扇作为一种基于证据的、非药物干预措施,用于治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的慢性呼吸困难:对专科呼吸临床医生观点的定性研究。
BMC Pulm Med. 2022 Apr 6;22(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s12890-022-01925-z.
9
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
10
Integrated breathlessness services for people with chronic conditions.为慢性病患者提供的综合呼吸急促服务。
Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2018 Sep;12(3):227-231. doi: 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000361.

引用本文的文献

1
Translating a Home-Based Breathlessness Service: A Pilot Study of Feasibility, Person-Reported, and Hospital Use Outcomes.家庭式呼吸困难服务的转化:一项关于可行性、患者报告及医院使用结果的试点研究
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 1;14(11):3894. doi: 10.3390/jcm14113894.
2
A narrative review of proactive palliative care models for people with COPD.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的前瞻性姑息治疗模式叙述性综述。
Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2025 Jan-Dec;19:17534666241310987. doi: 10.1177/17534666241310987.
3
An e-Learning Intervention for Professionals to Promote Family-Centered Cancer Care When a Significant Caregiver for Children Is at End of Life: Mixed Methods Evaluation Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Current pharmacological strategies for symptomatic reduction of persistent breathlessness - a literature review.当前缓解持续性呼吸困难症状的药物治疗策略——文献综述。
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2023 Feb;24(2):233-244. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2022.2160239. Epub 2022 Dec 28.
2
Evaluating the Application of the RE-AIM Planning and Evaluation Framework: An Updated Systematic Review and Exploration of Pragmatic Application.评估 RE-AIM 规划和评估框架的应用:更新的系统评价和实用应用探索。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jan 26;9:755738. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.755738. eCollection 2021.
3
Health service utilisation associated with chronic breathlessness: random population sample.
针对专业人员的电子学习干预措施,以在儿童的主要照顾者生命垂危时促进以家庭为中心的癌症护理:混合方法评估研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Dec 10;26:e65619. doi: 10.2196/65619.
4
Multicomponent services for symptoms in serious respiratory illness: a systematic review and meta-analysis.多组分服务治疗严重呼吸系统疾病症状:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Respir Rev. 2024 Oct 30;33(174). doi: 10.1183/16000617.0054-2024. Print 2024 Oct.
与慢性呼吸急促相关的医疗服务利用情况:随机人群样本
ERJ Open Res. 2021 Oct 11;7(4). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00415-2021. eCollection 2021 Oct.
4
Survivors' preferences for the organization and delivery of supportive care after treatment: An integrative review.治疗后支持性护理的组织和提供:幸存者的偏好——综合评价。
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2021 Oct;54:102040. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2021.102040. Epub 2021 Sep 14.
5
Trial feasibility and process evaluation of a motivationally-embellished group peer led walking intervention in retirement villages using the RE-AIM framework: the residents in action trial (RiAT).使用RE-AIM框架对退休村进行的动机强化型团体同伴引领步行干预的试验可行性和过程评估:居民行动试验(RiAT)
Health Psychol Behav Med. 2019 Jun 17;7(1):202-233. doi: 10.1080/21642850.2019.1629934.
6
Maintenance of non-pharmacological strategies 6 months after patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) attend a breathlessness service: a qualitative study.慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者在呼吸急促服务就诊 6 个月后维持非药物策略:定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 May 13;11(5):e050149. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050149.
7
The Effectiveness of Qigong in Managing a Cluster of Symptoms (Breathlessness-Fatigue-Anxiety) in Patients with Lung Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial.气功对肺癌患者呼吸困难-疲劳-焦虑症状群管理的有效性:一项随机对照试验。
Integr Cancer Ther. 2021 Jan-Dec;20:15347354211008253. doi: 10.1177/15347354211008253.
8
Effectiveness of a specialised breathlessness service for patients with advanced disease in Germany: a pragmatic fast-track randomised controlled trial (BreathEase).德国专门针对晚期疾病患者的呼吸困难服务的效果:一项实用的快速通道随机对照试验(BreathEase)。
Eur Respir J. 2021 Aug 26;58(2). doi: 10.1183/13993003.02139-2020. Print 2021 Aug.
9
A Methodological Review of Mixed Methods Research in Palliative and End-of-Life Care (2014-2019).姑息治疗和临终关怀混合方法研究的方法学回顾(2014-2019 年)。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 29;17(11):3853. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17113853.
10
Do Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases (COPD) Self-Management Interventions Consider Health Literacy and Patient Activation? A Systematic Review.慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)自我管理干预措施是否考虑了健康素养和患者能动性?一项系统综述。
J Clin Med. 2020 Feb 28;9(3):646. doi: 10.3390/jcm9030646.