Suppr超能文献

间作覆盖作物在作物-牲畜综合系统中的利用。

Grazing of cover crops in integrated crop-livestock systems.

机构信息

Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional de Rosario, C.C. 14, S 2125 ZAA Zavalla, Santa Fe, Argentina.

W.K. Kellogg Biological Station, Michigan State University, Hickory Corners, MI 49060, United States.

出版信息

Animal. 2021 Jan;15(1):100054. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2020.100054. Epub 2020 Dec 10.

Abstract

Conventional agriculture is specializing rapidly into the management of few monoculture crops, threatening crop diversity and questioning the sustainability of extensive cropping systems. The grazing of cover crops in integrated crop-livestock systems could be a feasible biologically based technology to restore crop diversity and mitigate ecological issues in cropping systems. However, there is limited evidence on plausible synergies or trade-offs for the practice, and about how grazing plans could affect the herbage production and services from cover crops. This work assessed the effects of cattle grazing on the primary and secondary production of annual ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) in an integrated ryegrass-soybean rotation system. Specifically, the prediction for synergistic effects of cattle grazing on the ryegrass herbage production, residual crop cover and animal performance were tested in a 2-year (2014 and 2015) study comprising a randomized complete block design of four grazing intensity treatments, replicated three times. A no-cattle grazing treatment (NG), used as control, or continuous grazing with Holstein heifers (~220kg live weight) at targeted sward heights of 5, 10, 15 and 20cm (hereafter referred as G, G, G and G, respectively) was applied to ryegrass plots. The herbage production and residual herbage cover of ryegrass, and the average daily gain (ADG, kg/day) and live weight gain per hectare (LWG, kg/ha) of heifers were analyzed by ANOVA (P<0.05) and compared by the Tukey test (P<0.05). Regression models were used to estimate relationships between herbage production, animal performance and sward height. The herbage production was 60% higher (P<0.01) for the grazing treatments compared to NG. The residual herbage for G and G was not different than that for NG and increased linearly as sward heights increased, reaching highest values for G and G Maximum ADG was 1.10kg/day for ryegrass grazed at a 20.6cm height, whereas maximum LWG was 427kg/ha for ryegrass grazed to a 16.1cm height. The results support the hypothesis for synergistic effects of using annual ryegrass as a dual forage and service cover crop. Moderate grazing intensity to sward height of 12-18cm with continuous stocking led to optimized forage production and utilization by dairy heifers.

摘要

传统农业正在迅速专业化,专门种植少数几种单一栽培作物,这威胁到作物多样性,并对广泛的种植系统的可持续性提出了质疑。在作物-牲畜综合系统中放牧覆盖作物可能是一种可行的基于生物学的技术,可以恢复作物多样性,并减轻种植系统中的生态问题。然而,关于这种做法的合理协同作用或权衡取舍的证据有限,也不知道放牧计划如何影响覆盖作物的草料生产和服务。本工作评估了在黑麦草-大豆轮作系统中,牛放牧对一年生黑麦草(Lolium multiflorum)初级和次级生产的影响。具体来说,在一项为期两年(2014 年和 2015 年)的研究中,通过随机完全区组设计的四种放牧强度处理的三次重复,测试了牛放牧对黑麦草草料生产、剩余作物覆盖和动物性能的协同作用的预测。不进行牛放牧处理(NG),用作对照,或在目标草地高度为 5、10、15 和 20cm 时用荷斯坦小母牛(~220kg 活重)连续放牧(分别称为 G、G、G 和 G)用于黑麦草地块。通过方差分析(P<0.05)分析黑麦草的草料产量和剩余草料覆盖率,以及小母牛的平均日增重(ADG,kg/天)和每公顷活重增重(LWG,kg/ha),并通过 Tukey 检验(P<0.05)进行比较。回归模型用于估计草料生产、动物性能和草地高度之间的关系。与 NG 相比,放牧处理的草料产量高 60%(P<0.01)。G 和 G 的剩余草料与 NG 没有差异,并随草地高度线性增加,在 G 和 G 时达到最高值。黑麦草放牧高度为 20.6cm 时,最大 ADG 为 1.10kg/天,而放牧高度为 16.1cm 时,最大 LWG 为 427kg/ha。结果支持使用一年生黑麦草作为双重饲料和服务覆盖作物的协同作用假设。适度的放牧强度(12-18cm 的草地高度)和连续放牧导致奶牛小母牛优化了草料生产和利用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验