Lee Yogaku, Oya Mitsuru, Kaburagi Tokihiko, Hidaka Shunsuke, Nakagawa Takashi
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Graduate School of Design, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
J Voice. 2023 Mar;37(2):298.e11-298.e29. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.12.028. Epub 2021 Jan 29.
Typical singing registers are the chest and falsetto; however, trained singers have an additional register, namely, the mixed register. The mixed register, which is also called "mixed voice" or "mix," is an important technique for singers, as it can help bridge from the chest voice to falsetto without noticeable voice breaks.
The present study aims to reveal the nature of the voice-production mechanism of the different registers (chest, mix, and falsetto) using high-speed digital imaging (HSDI), electroglottography (EGG), and acoustic and aerodynamic measurements.
Cross-sectional study.
Aerodynamic measurements were acquired for twelve healthy singers (six men and women) during the phonation of a variety of pitches using three registers. HSDI and EGG devices were simultaneously used on three healthy singers (two men and one woman) from which an open quotient (OQ) and speed quotient (SQ) were detected. Audio signals were recorded for five sustained vowels, and a spectral analysis was conducted to determine the amplitude of each harmonic component. Furthermore, the absolute (not relative) value of the glottal volume flow was estimated by integrating data obtained from the HSDI and aerodynamic studies.
For all singers, the subglottal pressure (P) was the highest for the chest in the three registers, and the mean flow rate (MFR) was the highest for the falsetto. Conversely, the P of the mix was as low as the falsetto, and the MFR of the mix was as low as the chest. The HSDI analysis showed that the OQ differed significantly among the registers, even when the fundamental frequency was the same; the OQ of the mix was higher than that of the chest but lower than that of the falsetto. The acoustic analysis showed that, for the mix, the harmonic structure was intermediate between the chest and falsetto. The results of the glottal volume-flow analysis revealed that the maximum volume velocity was the least for the mix register at every fundamental frequency. The first and second harmonic (H1-H2) difference of the voice source spectrum was the greatest for the falsetto, then the mix, and finally, the chest.
We found differences in the registers in terms of the aeromechanical mechanisms and vibration patterns of the vocal folds. The mixed register proved to have a distinct voice-production mechanism, which can be differentiated from those of the chest or falsetto registers.
典型的歌唱声区是胸声区和假声区;然而,经过训练的歌手还有一个额外的声区,即混声区。混声区,也被称为“混声”或“混音”,是歌手的一项重要技术,因为它可以帮助从胸声平稳过渡到假声而没有明显的声音间断。
本研究旨在通过高速数字成像(HSDI)、电声门图(EGG)以及声学和空气动力学测量来揭示不同声区(胸声区、混声区和假声区)的发声机制本质。
横断面研究。
对12名健康歌手(6名男性和6名女性)在使用三种声区发出各种音高时进行空气动力学测量。同时对3名健康歌手(2名男性和1名女性)使用HSDI和EGG设备,检测出开放商数(OQ)和速度商数(SQ)。记录五个持续元音的音频信号,并进行频谱分析以确定每个谐波成分的幅度。此外,通过整合从HSDI和空气动力学研究中获得的数据来估计声门容积流量的绝对值(而非相对值)。
对于所有歌手,在三种声区中,胸声区的声门下压力(P)最高,假声区的平均流速(MFR)最高。相反,混声区的P与假声区一样低,混声区的MFR与胸声区一样低。HSDI分析表明,即使基频相同,不同声区的OQ也有显著差异;混声区的OQ高于胸声区但低于假声区。声学分析表明,对于混声区,谐波结构介于胸声区和假声区之间。声门容积流量分析结果显示,在每个基频下,混声区的最大容积速度最小。声源频谱的第一和第二谐波(H1 - H2)差异在假声区最大,其次是混声区,最后是胸声区。
我们发现不同声区在声带的气动机械机制和振动模式方面存在差异。混声区被证明具有独特的发声机制,可与胸声区或假声区的发声机制区分开来。