• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

接受法匹拉韦治疗的 COVID-19 患者鼻咽 SARS-CoV-2 病毒载量反应。

Nasopharyngeal SARS-CoV-2 Viral Load Response among COVID-19 Patients Receiving Favipiravir.

机构信息

Bamrasnaradura Infectious Diseases Institute, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand.

Department of Medical Sciences, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand.

出版信息

Jpn J Infect Dis. 2021 Sep 22;74(5):416-420. doi: 10.7883/yoken.JJID.2020.827. Epub 2021 Jan 29.

DOI:10.7883/yoken.JJID.2020.827
PMID:33518623
Abstract

We retrospectively studied nasopharyngeal severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) viral load in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients who were hospitalized between January 13 and April 1, 2020. Quantitative real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was conducted using primers and probes targeting the ORF1ab and N genes. All patients were classified in the following groups: Group 1: received favipiravir + chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine + lopinavir/ritonavir or darunavir/ritonavir for 5-10 days, Group 2: received chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine + lopinavir/ritonavir or darunavir/ritonavir for 5-10 days, and Group 3: no antiviral medication. Among the 115 patients, 38 (33%), 54 (47%), and 23 (20%) were in Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The median (IQR) baseline viral loads on day 0 of Groups 1, 2, and 3 were 7.2 (6.0-8.1), 6.9 (5.8-7.8), and 6.9 (5.8-7.6) log copies/mL, respectively. The reductions of mean viral loads on day 3 from baseline were 2.41, 1.38, and 2.19 log copies/mL in the corresponding groups (P < 0.05). There were no differences in the reduction of mean viral loads from baseline among the three groups on days 5 and 10 (P > 0.05). Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that receiving favipiravir was associated with nasopharyngeal viral load reduction at three days (P = 0.001). Significant nasopharyngeal SARS-CoV-2 viral load reduction was achieved in COVID-19 patients who received a favipiravir-containing regimen.

摘要

我们回顾性研究了 2020 年 1 月 13 日至 4 月 1 日期间住院的 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)患者的鼻咽严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)病毒载量。使用针对 ORF1ab 和 N 基因的引物和探针进行定量实时逆转录-聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)。所有患者均分为以下三组:第 1 组:接受利巴韦林+氯喹或羟氯喹+洛匹那韦/利托那韦或达鲁那韦/利托那韦治疗 5-10 天,第 2 组:接受氯喹或羟氯喹+洛匹那韦/利托那韦或达鲁那韦/利托那韦治疗 5-10 天,第 3 组:未接受抗病毒治疗。在 115 例患者中,第 1、2 和 3 组分别有 38(33%)、54(47%)和 23(20%)例。第 1、2 和 3 组患者的基线病毒载量中位数(IQR)分别为第 0 天的 7.2(6.0-8.1)、6.9(5.8-7.8)和 6.9(5.8-7.6)log10 拷贝/ml。相应组中第 3 天的平均病毒载量从基线的降低分别为 2.41、1.38 和 2.19 log10 拷贝/ml(P<0.05)。在第 5 天和第 10 天,三组之间的平均病毒载量从基线的降低没有差异(P>0.05)。多变量逻辑回归分析显示,接受利巴韦林与第 3 天鼻咽病毒载量的降低有关(P=0.001)。在接受利巴韦林治疗的 COVID-19 患者中,显著降低了鼻咽 SARS-CoV-2 病毒载量。

相似文献

1
Nasopharyngeal SARS-CoV-2 Viral Load Response among COVID-19 Patients Receiving Favipiravir.接受法匹拉韦治疗的 COVID-19 患者鼻咽 SARS-CoV-2 病毒载量反应。
Jpn J Infect Dis. 2021 Sep 22;74(5):416-420. doi: 10.7883/yoken.JJID.2020.827. Epub 2021 Jan 29.
2
Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of favipiravir and interferon compared to lopinavir/ritonavir and interferon in moderately ill patients with COVID-19: a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.评价法维拉韦和干扰素与洛匹那韦/利托那韦和干扰素在 COVID-19 中度患者中的疗效和安全性:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Oct 27;21(1):886. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04747-8.
3
Effects of hydroxychloroquine and favipiravir on clinical course in outpatients with COVID-19.羟氯喹和法匹拉韦对 COVID-19 门诊患者临床病程的影响。
Turk J Med Sci. 2021 Dec 13;51(6):2827-2834. doi: 10.3906/sag-2101-146.
4
The comparison of favipiravir and lopinavir/ritonavir combination in COVID-19 treatment.法匹拉韦与洛匹那韦/利托那韦联合用药在COVID-19治疗中的比较。
Turk J Med Sci. 2021 Aug 30;51(4):1624-1630. doi: 10.3906/sag-2012-189.
5
Favipiravir, lopinavir-ritonavir, or combination therapy (FLARE): A randomised, double-blind, 2 × 2 factorial placebo-controlled trial of early antiviral therapy in COVID-19.法匹拉韦、洛匹那韦利托那韦或联合治疗(FLARE):一项在 COVID-19 中早期抗病毒治疗的随机、双盲、2×2 析因安慰剂对照试验。
PLoS Med. 2022 Oct 19;19(10):e1004120. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004120. eCollection 2022 Oct.
6
SARS-CoV-2: Recent Reports on Antiviral Therapies Based on Lopinavir/Ritonavir, Darunavir/Umifenovir, Hydroxychloroquine, Remdesivir, Favipiravir and other Drugs for the Treatment of the New Coronavirus.SARS-CoV-2:洛匹那韦/利托那韦、达芦那韦/乌苯美司、羟氯喹、瑞德西韦、法匹拉韦等药物治疗新型冠状病毒的抗病毒治疗的最新报告。
Curr Med Chem. 2020;27(27):4536-4541. doi: 10.2174/0929867327666200416131117.
7
A Trial of Favipiravir and Hydroxychloroquine combination in Adults Hospitalized with moderate and severe Covid-19: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.一项评估法匹拉韦和羟氯喹联合治疗中重度 COVID-19 住院成人的疗效和安全性的随机对照研究:研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Oct 31;21(1):904. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04825-x.
8
The effect of favipiravir on QTc interval in patients hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019.法匹拉韦对2019冠状病毒病住院患者QTc间期的影响。
J Electrocardiol. 2020 Nov-Dec;63:115-119. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2020.10.015. Epub 2020 Nov 6.
9
Favipiravir at high doses has potent antiviral activity in SARS-CoV-2-infected hamsters, whereas hydroxychloroquine lacks activity.高剂量的法匹拉韦对感染 SARS-CoV-2 的仓鼠具有强大的抗病毒活性,而羟氯喹则没有活性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Oct 27;117(43):26955-26965. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2014441117. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
10
Combination of (interferon beta-1b, lopinavir/ritonavir and ribavirin) versus favipiravir in hospitalized patients with non-critical COVID-19: A cohort study.联合使用(干扰素 beta-1b、洛匹那韦/利托那韦和利巴韦林)与法匹拉韦治疗非重症 COVID-19 住院患者:一项队列研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 10;16(6):e0252984. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252984. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Early treatment of Favipiravir in COVID-19 patients without pneumonia: a multicentre, open-labelled, randomized control study.COVID-19 患者中无肺炎的法维拉韦早期治疗:一项多中心、开放标签、随机对照研究。
Emerg Microbes Infect. 2022 Dec;11(1):2197-2206. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2022.2117092.
2
Favipiravir versus standard of care in patients with severe COVID-19 infections: A retrospective comparative study.法维拉韦与重症 COVID-19 感染患者标准治疗的比较:一项回顾性对比研究。
J Infect Public Health. 2021 Sep;14(9):1247-1253. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2021.08.022. Epub 2021 Aug 24.