Hebets Eileen A, Bern Mitch, McGinley Rowan H, Roberts Andy, Kershenbaum Arik, Starrett James, Bond Jason E
University of Nebraska-Lincoln Lincoln NE USA.
The Ohio State University at Newark Campus Newark OH USA.
Ecol Evol. 2020 Dec 30;11(2):852-871. doi: 10.1002/ece3.7089. eCollection 2021 Jan.
Understanding the relative importance of different sources of selection (e.g., the environment, social/sexual selection) on the divergence or convergence of reproductive communication can shed light on the origin, maintenance, or even disappearance of species boundaries. Using a multistep approach, we tested the hypothesis that two presumed sister species of wolf spider with overlapping ranges and microhabitat use, yet differing degrees of sexual dimorphism, have diverged in their reliance on modality-specific courtship signaling. We predicted that male (no ornamentation) rely predominantly on diet-dependent vibratory signaling for mating success. In contrast, we predicted that male (black foreleg brushes) rely on diet-dependent visual signaling. We first tested and corroborated the sister-species relationship between and using phylogenomic scale data. Next, we tested for species-specific, diet-dependent vibratory and visual signaling by manipulating subadult diet and subsequently quantifying adult morphology and mature male courtship signals. As predicted, vibratory signal form was diet-dependent in while visual ornamentation (brush area) was diet-dependent in . We then compared the species-specific reliance on vibratory and visual signaling by recording mating across artificially manipulated signaling environments (presence/absence of each modality in a 2 × 2 full factorial design). In accordance with our diet dependence results for the presence of vibratory signaling was important for mating success. In contrast, the light and vibratory environment interacted to influence mating success in with vibratory signaling being important only in the absence of light. We found no differences in overall activity patterns. Given that these species overlap in much of their range and microhabitat use, we suggest that competition for signaling space may have led to the divergence and differential use of sensory modalities between these sister species.
了解不同选择来源(例如,环境、社会/性选择)对生殖交流的分化或趋同的相对重要性,有助于阐明物种边界的起源、维持甚至消失。我们采用多步骤方法,检验了以下假设:两种假定的狼蛛姐妹物种,分布范围和微生境使用重叠,但性二态性程度不同,它们在对特定模态求偶信号的依赖上已经发生了分化。我们预测,雄性(无装饰)主要依靠依赖饮食的振动信号来实现交配成功。相比之下,我们预测雄性(黑色前腿刷)依靠依赖饮食的视觉信号。我们首先使用系统基因组规模的数据测试并证实了 和 之间的姐妹物种关系。接下来,我们通过控制亚成体饮食并随后量化成体形态和成熟雄性求偶信号,来测试物种特异性的、依赖饮食的振动和视觉信号。正如预测的那样,振动信号形式在 中依赖饮食,而视觉装饰(刷面积)在 中依赖饮食。然后,我们通过记录在人工操纵的信号环境(2×2全因子设计中每种模态的存在/不存在)中的交配情况,比较了物种对振动和视觉信号的特异性依赖。与我们对 的饮食依赖性结果一致,振动信号的存在对交配成功很重要。相比之下,光照和振动环境相互作用影响 中的交配成功,振动信号仅在没有光照时才重要。我们发现总体活动模式没有差异。鉴于这些物种在其大部分分布范围和微生境使用上重叠,可以认为对信号空间的竞争可能导致了这些姐妹物种之间感觉模态的分化和不同使用。