• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种临床标准评估儿童修复体周围龋损效果的研究(CARDEC-03):一项诊断性随机临床试验研究方案。

The effect of two clinical criteria in the assessment of caries lesions around restorations in children (CARDEC-03): study protocol for a diagnostic randomized clinical trial.

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Graduate Program in Dentistry, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

出版信息

F1000Res. 2020 Jun 26;9:650. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.23801.3. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.12688/f1000research.23801.3
PMID:33520191
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7818095/
Abstract

The detection of caries lesions around restoration can be challenging. Therefore, the use of some criteria has been proposed in order to give more objectivity to the diagnosis process. Two of them are the International Dental Federation (FDI) and the Caries Associated with Restorations and Sealants (CARS) criteria. Both methods have a different approach to caries, and it is not possible to know which one of them is the best to use in clinical practice to assess restorations in children. Thus, the present protocol aims to evaluate the effect of the use of the FDI and CARS criteria in the assessment of caries lesions around restorations in primary teeth on outcomes related to oral health in children and costs resulting from the assessments. A total of 626 restorations of children from three to 10 years were randomly assessed and are being treated following the FDI criteria (FDI group) or CARS criteria (CARS group). Participants will be followed-up after six, 12, 18, and 24 months. The primary outcome will be the need for a new intervention in the evaluated restorations. This outcome consists of several components, and each of these events will be analyzed separately as secondary outcomes. The changes in children's oral health-related quality of life and the cost of the restoration dental treatments will also be analyzed as secondary outcomes. The methods will be compared using the Cox regression model with shared frailty. A significance level of 5% will be adopted for all statistical analyses. This will be the first randomized clinical study carried out regarding the detection of caries lesions around restorations in primary teeth. The study underwent registration in Clinicaltrials.gov ( NCT03520309) on 9 May 2018.

摘要

龋损周围修复体的检测具有挑战性。因此,为了使诊断过程更具客观性,提出了一些标准。其中两个是国际牙科联合会(FDI)和龋病相关修复体和封闭剂(CARS)标准。这两种方法对龋病的处理方式不同,无法确定在临床实践中使用哪种方法来评估儿童的修复体更好。因此,本方案旨在评估 FDI 和 CARS 标准在评估儿童乳牙修复体周围龋损时对儿童口腔健康相关结局和评估成本的影响。

共对 626 名 3 至 10 岁儿童的修复体进行了随机评估,根据 FDI 标准(FDI 组)或 CARS 标准(CARS 组)进行治疗。参与者将在 6、12、18 和 24 个月后进行随访。主要结局是评估修复体需要新的干预。该结局由几个组成部分组成,这些事件中的每一个都将作为次要结局单独进行分析。儿童口腔健康相关生活质量的变化和修复牙治疗的成本也将作为次要结局进行分析。将使用具有共享脆弱性的 Cox 回归模型比较这些方法。所有统计分析的显著性水平均设为 5%。

这将是首次针对乳牙修复体周围龋损检测的随机临床研究。该研究于 2018 年 5 月 9 日在 Clinicaltrials.gov(NCT03520309)上进行了注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0eff/7818521/f3b78ed9bf37/f1000research-9-34232-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0eff/7818521/d4a997c2d5f0/f1000research-9-34232-g0000.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0eff/7818521/bf8432116668/f1000research-9-34232-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0eff/7818521/97dbf242b243/f1000research-9-34232-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0eff/7818521/fb6e92951fab/f1000research-9-34232-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0eff/7818521/f3b78ed9bf37/f1000research-9-34232-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0eff/7818521/d4a997c2d5f0/f1000research-9-34232-g0000.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0eff/7818521/bf8432116668/f1000research-9-34232-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0eff/7818521/97dbf242b243/f1000research-9-34232-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0eff/7818521/fb6e92951fab/f1000research-9-34232-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0eff/7818521/f3b78ed9bf37/f1000research-9-34232-g0004.jpg

相似文献

1
The effect of two clinical criteria in the assessment of caries lesions around restorations in children (CARDEC-03): study protocol for a diagnostic randomized clinical trial.两种临床标准评估儿童修复体周围龋损效果的研究(CARDEC-03):一项诊断性随机临床试验研究方案。
F1000Res. 2020 Jun 26;9:650. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.23801.3. eCollection 2020.
2
Study protocol for a diagnostic randomized clinical trial to evaluate the effect of the use of two clinical criteria in the assessment of caries lesions around restorations in adults: the Caries Cognition and Identification in Adults (CaCIA) trial.一项评估两种临床标准在评估成人修复体周围龋损中的应用效果的诊断随机临床试验研究方案:成人龋病认知和识别(CaCIA)试验。
BMC Oral Health. 2020 Nov 10;20(1):317. doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-01307-z.
3
Clinical Accuracy of Two Different Criteria for the Detection of Caries Lesions around Restorations in Primary Teeth.两种不同标准检测乳牙修复体周围龋损的临床准确性。
Caries Res. 2022;56(2):98-108. doi: 10.1159/000523951. Epub 2022 May 3.
4
The economic impact of two diagnostic strategies in the management of restorations in primary teeth: a health economic analysis plan for a trial-based economic evaluation.两种诊断策略在儿童乳牙修复管理中的经济影响:基于试验的经济评价的健康经济分析计划。
Trials. 2021 Nov 12;22(1):794. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05722-7.
5
Influence of different clinical criteria on the decision to replace restorations in primary teeth.不同临床标准对替换乳前牙修复体决策的影响。
J Dent. 2020 Oct;101:103421. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103421. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
6
Accuracy of Two Visual Criteria for the Assessment of Caries around Restorations: A Delayed-Type Cross-Sectional Study.两种评估修复体周围龋病的视觉标准的准确性:一项迟发型横断面研究。
Caries Res. 2023;57(1):12-20. doi: 10.1159/000528730. Epub 2022 Dec 22.
7
Dental fillings for the treatment of caries in the primary dentition.用于治疗乳牙龋齿的补牙材料。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Apr 15(2):CD004483. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004483.pub2.
8
Comparison of two clinical approaches based on visual criteria for secondary caries assessments and treatment decisions in permanent posterior teeth.比较两种基于视觉标准的临床方法,用于评估恒牙后牙继发龋并做出治疗决策。
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Mar 18;22(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02112-6.
9
Impact of different restorative treatments for deep caries lesion in primary teeth (CEPECO 1) - study protocol for a noninferiority randomized clinical trial.不同修复治疗方法对儿童乳牙深龋的影响(CEPECO 1)-一项非劣效性随机临床试验的研究方案。
BMC Oral Health. 2019 Jan 8;19(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12903-018-0703-3.
10
Impact of non-restorative cavity control on proximal carious lesions of anterior primary teeth on the tooth survival and patient-centered outcomes (CEPECO 2): study protocol for a non-inferiority randomized clinical trial.非修复性龋洞控制对乳前牙邻面龋损的牙齿留存率及以患者为中心结局的影响(CEPECO 2):一项非劣效性随机临床试验的研究方案
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Mar 31;21(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01524-0.

引用本文的文献

1
The economic impact of two diagnostic strategies in the management of restorations in primary teeth: a health economic analysis plan for a trial-based economic evaluation.两种诊断策略在儿童乳牙修复管理中的经济影响:基于试验的经济评价的健康经济分析计划。
Trials. 2021 Nov 12;22(1):794. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05722-7.