Suppr超能文献

玻璃体切除术与玻璃体内注射雷珠单抗治疗伴玻璃体黄斑界面异常的糖尿病性黄斑水肿的对比研究

Pars Plana Vitrectomy versus Intravitreal Injection of Ranibizumab in the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema Associated with Vitreomacular Interface Abnormalities.

作者信息

Elkayal Hassan, Bedda Ahmed M, El-Goweini Hesham, Souka Ahmed A, Gomaa Amir Ramadan

机构信息

Ophthalmology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.

出版信息

J Ophthalmol. 2021 Jan 12;2021:6699668. doi: 10.1155/2021/6699668. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) versus intravitreal injection (IVI) of ranibizumab (RBZ) in the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME) associated with vitreomacular interface abnormalities (VMIA).

METHODS

The records of patients presenting with DME and VMIA throughout 2016 to 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into 2 groups: group I received IVIs of RBZ and group II underwent PPV with internal limiting membrane peeling. The main outcome measures were the change in the LogMAR corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) and central subfield thickness (CSFT) on optical coherence tomography over 6 months.

RESULTS

At 6 months, mean CDVA improved by 0.22 ± 0.21 in group I patients ( < 0.001), while in group II, it improved only by 0.09 ± 0.22 ( < 0.115). Fifty-five percent of group I and 60% of group II patients had stable CDVA (within 2 lines from baseline) at 6 months. Significant improvement in vision (gain of 2 or more lines) was seen in 45% and 30%, respectively. Worsening of vision (loss of 2 or more lines) was seen only in 2 patients in group II, but none in group I. The mean CSFT improved significantly in both groups (by 162 and 216 , respectively; < 0.001). The mean CSFT at 6 months was similar in both groups (354 and 311 , respectively; =0.172).

CONCLUSIONS

Both treatments resulted in anatomical improvement of DME with concurrent VMIA. Visual improvement was more pronounced in the IVI group, although this may have been affected by other confounding factors.

摘要

目的

比较玻璃体切除术(PPV)与玻璃体内注射雷珠单抗(RBZ)治疗伴有玻璃体黄斑界面异常(VMIA)的糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)的疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2016年至2018年期间出现DME和VMIA患者的病历。患者分为两组:第一组接受RBZ玻璃体内注射,第二组接受PPV联合内界膜剥除术。主要观察指标为6个月内光学相干断层扫描上的LogMAR矫正远视力(CDVA)和中心子野厚度(CSFT)的变化。

结果

6个月时,第一组患者的平均CDVA提高了0.22±0.21(P<0.001),而第二组仅提高了0.09±0.22(P<0.115)。第一组55%和第二组60%的患者在6个月时CDVA稳定(与基线相差2行以内)。分别有45%和30%的患者视力有显著改善(提高2行或更多)。仅第二组有2例患者视力恶化(下降2行或更多),而第一组无。两组的平均CSFT均显著改善(分别为162μm和216μm;P<0.001)。两组6个月时的平均CSFT相似(分别为354μm和311μm;P=0.172)。

结论

两种治疗方法均使伴有VMIA的DME在解剖学上得到改善。玻璃体内注射组的视力改善更为明显,尽管这可能受到其他混杂因素的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6307/7817299/ad71fd159911/joph2021-6699668.001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验