• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非专业人士/通俗易懂的总结:申办方、合同研究组织(CRO)和研究机构能在2020年实现目标吗?

Layperson/Plain Language Summaries: Can Sponsors, CROs, and Sites Deliver in 2020?

作者信息

Wilcox Charles S, Franceschi Leslie, Simmons Adam

机构信息

Dr. Wilcox is Chief Executive Officer at Praxis Research Consulting in Newport Beach, California.

Ms. Franceschi is Senior Project Director at Syneos Health in Morrisville, North Carolina.

出版信息

Innov Clin Neurosci. 2020 Jul 1;17(7-9):41-44.

PMID:33520403
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7839658/
Abstract

The much-anticipated 2014 European Union (EU) Clinical Trial Regulation requiring Layperson/ Plain Language Summaries (PLS) is slated for implementation in 2020. At the 10th Annual CNS Summit Conference (Fall 2019), a panel discussion was convened with the objective of evaluating the likelihood of the PLS legislation being implemented successfully in the EU and voluntarily (e.g., pro-actively) in the rest of the world. Points of the discussion embraced the notion that this is an excellent opportunity for the entire pharmaceutical industry. Moreover, in the United States, public opinion of the pharmaceutical industry hit an all-time low in 2019, surpassing the oil industry with regard to public distrust. For decades, clinical trial participants have stated that wanting to learn, in layperson terms, the results of the study was second only to wanting to learn the treatment group into which they were assigned under double-blind conditions. Our conclusion is that while confidentiality, commercial interests, total costs, regulatory concerns, as well as some operational aspects (i.e., patient access portals) are among the hurdles, our commentary strongly advocates systematic implementation not only within the EU, but that this should be implemented globally, without further delay.

摘要

备受期待的2014年欧盟(EU)临床试验法规要求提供非专业人士/通俗易懂的总结(PLS),定于2020年实施。在第十届年度中枢神经系统峰会会议(2019年秋季)上,召开了一次小组讨论,目的是评估PLS立法在欧盟成功实施以及在世界其他地区自愿(例如主动)实施的可能性。讨论要点包括这对整个制药行业来说是一个绝佳机会的观点。此外,在美国,2019年公众对制药行业的看法跌至历史最低点,在公众不信任方面超过了石油行业。几十年来,临床试验参与者表示,想用非专业术语了解研究结果的愿望仅次于想知道自己在双盲条件下被分配到哪个治疗组的愿望。我们的结论是,虽然保密、商业利益、总成本、监管问题以及一些操作方面(即患者访问门户)是障碍之一,但我们的评论强烈主张不仅在欧盟内部进行系统实施,而且应该在全球范围内立即实施,不再拖延。

相似文献

1
Layperson/Plain Language Summaries: Can Sponsors, CROs, and Sites Deliver in 2020?非专业人士/通俗易懂的总结:申办方、合同研究组织(CRO)和研究机构能在2020年实现目标吗?
Innov Clin Neurosci. 2020 Jul 1;17(7-9):41-44.
2
Plain Language Summaries of Clinical Trial Results: A Preliminary Study to Assess Availability of Easy-to-Understand Summaries and Approaches to Improving Public Engagement.临床试验结果的简明报告:评估易于理解的摘要的可用性和提高公众参与度的方法的初步研究。
Pharmaceut Med. 2020 Dec;34(6):401-406. doi: 10.1007/s40290-020-00359-4. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
3
[Clinical trials with investigational medicinal products-initial experiences with the new EU clinical trial regulation 536/2014 and challenges and opportunities for contract research organisations].[用研究性药品进行临床试验——欧盟新临床试验法规536/2014的初步经验以及合同研究组织面临的挑战与机遇]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2023 Jan;66(1):21-27. doi: 10.1007/s00103-022-03630-y. Epub 2022 Dec 16.
4
Russian translations for Cochrane.考科蓝系统评价协作网的俄语翻译。
Int J Risk Saf Med. 2015;27 Suppl 1:S112-3. doi: 10.3233/JRS-150713.
5
The European clinical trials regulation (No 536/2014): changes and challenges.《欧洲临床试验法规(No 536/2014):变化与挑战》。
Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Nov;12(11):1027-1032. doi: 10.1080/17512433.2019.1680282. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
6
Open Pharma recommendations for plain language summaries of peer-reviewed medical journal publications.开放制药公司对同行评议医学期刊出版物的简明摘要的建议。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2021 Nov;37(11):2015-2016. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2021.1971185. Epub 2021 Sep 12.
7
What Author Instructions Do Health Journals Provide for Writing Plain Language Summaries? A Scoping Review.健康期刊对撰写通俗易懂的摘要提供了哪些作者指南?一项范围综述。
Patient. 2023 Jan;16(1):31-42. doi: 10.1007/s40271-022-00606-7. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
8
A practical 'How-To' Guide to plain language summaries (PLS) of peer-reviewed scientific publications: results of a multi-stakeholder initiative utilizing co-creation methodology.同行评审科学出版物简明语言摘要(PLS)实用“操作指南”:采用共同创作方法的多方利益相关者倡议结果
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Jun 2;8(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00358-6.
9
Lay Summaries of Clinical Study Results: An Overview.临床研究结果的通俗概述:综述
Pharmaceut Med. 2019 Aug;33(4):261-268. doi: 10.1007/s40290-019-00285-0.
10
Will the EU Clinical Trials Regulation Support the Innovative Industry in Bringing New Medicines Faster to Patients?欧盟临床试验法规能否支持创新产业更快地为患者带来新药?
Pharmaceut Med. 2013 Apr;27(2):75-82. doi: 10.1007/s40290-013-0012-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Primer on Plain Language Summaries for Advanced Practice Providers With Published Examples and Practical Applications to Practice.面向高级执业人员的简明语言摘要入门指南,附已发表示例及实际应用于实践的内容。
J Adv Pract Oncol. 2025 Jun 25:1-16. doi: 10.6004/jadpro.2025.16.7.20.
2
Challenges and Opportunities for Professional Medical Publications Writers to Contribute to Plain Language Summaries (PLS) in an AI/ML Environment - A Consumer Health Informatics Systematic Review.专业医学出版物作者在人工智能/机器学习环境下为普通语言摘要(PLS)做出贡献所面临的挑战和机遇——消费者健康信息学系统评价。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2024 Jan 11;2023:709-717. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Lay Summaries of Clinical Study Results: An Overview.临床研究结果的通俗概述:综述
Pharmaceut Med. 2019 Aug;33(4):261-268. doi: 10.1007/s40290-019-00285-0.
2
Factors associated with clinical trials that fail and opportunities for improving the likelihood of success: A review.与失败的临床试验相关的因素及提高成功可能性的机会:一项综述。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2018 Aug 7;11:156-164. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2018.08.001. eCollection 2018 Sep.
3
Opioid abuse in the United States and Department of Health and Human Services actions to address opioid-drug-related overdoses and deaths.美国的阿片类药物滥用情况以及美国卫生与公众服务部为应对与阿片类药物相关的过量用药和死亡所采取的行动。
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2015 Jun;29(2):133-9. doi: 10.3109/15360288.2015.1037530.
4
Barriers and opportunities for enhancing patient recruitment and retention in clinical research: findings from an interview study in an NHS academic health science centre.提高临床研究中患者招募与留存率的障碍与机遇:来自国民保健服务体系(NHS)学术健康科学中心一项访谈研究的结果
Health Res Policy Syst. 2015 Mar 12;13:8. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-13-8.
5
CNS sites cooperate to detect duplicate subjects with a clinical trial subject registry.中枢神经系统(CNS)相关机构通过临床试验受试者注册系统合作检测重复受试者。
Innov Clin Neurosci. 2013 Feb;10(2):17-21.
6
Meeting the obligation to communicate clinical trial results to study volunteers.履行向研究志愿者通报临床试验结果的义务。
Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2012 Mar;5(2):149-56. doi: 10.1586/ecp.12.7.
7
FDA weighs limits for online ads.美国食品药品监督管理局权衡网络广告的限制措施。
JAMA. 2010 Jan 27;303(4):311-3. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1961.
8
Communicating the results of clinical research to participants: attitudes, practices, and future directions.向参与者传达临床研究结果:态度、做法及未来方向。
PLoS Med. 2008 May 13;5(5):e91. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050091.
9
Drug risks and free speech--can Congress ban consumer drug ads?药品风险与言论自由——国会能否禁止面向消费者的药品广告?
N Engl J Med. 2007 May 31;356(22):2236-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp078080. Epub 2007 May 2.
10
Increasing ethnic diversity and managed care: how will they influence research patient recruitment in the nineties?不断增加的种族多样性与管理式医疗:它们将如何影响20世纪90年代的研究患者招募?
Psychopharmacol Bull. 1996;32(2):193-200.